There is an increased drive by operators for integration and real deployment which highlights new issues and problems with individual network management protocols and models, or the wider integration of those. Some of these problems are witnessed only when trying to manage large scale networks, e.g., due to the increased complexity and handling large volumes of data exported in frequent updates. At the same time, simplifying the network management and operations, with increased automation, is a high priority. The goals of the Network Management Operations working group are to solicit input from network operators to identify near term operational issues arising from the deployment of network management technologies, to determine potential solutions or workarounds for those issues. Those operational issues may relate to deployments of existing network management technologies or the integration of related technologies for network management and telemetry. Since the focus is on helping solve problems faced by operators, discussion is not solely limited to network management technologies standardized within the IETF. Solving those operational issues require discussion, investigation, and potentially some experiments, which may take some time, however the working group will focus on pragmatic items achievable in a short timeframe over long term architectural visions. The Network Management Operations working group is scoped, in order of highest priority, to: * Present and discuss operational issues faced by deployment of network management technologies. * Incubate ideas and short term experiments on improving network management operations. Any experiments should focus on incremental improvements that can be achieved within 1-2 years. * Discuss network operator use cases and requirements for solving anticipated network management problems. * Informally engage with developers of open-source software to help drive adoption and improve protocol maturity of IETF network management standards. * Implement small protocol enhancements to help facilitate deployment, subject to the following constraints: * Protocol extensions for protocols in scope for existing working groups must be taken to those working groups unless there is an agreement by the working group’s responsible area director and the Operations/Management area director to progress the enhancement within this working group. * More significant protocol work (on existing or new protocols) is out of scope for this working group and must be done in another existing or new WG. * Describe and document operational experience and best practice. Agenda time should be balanced between presentations and discussions of operator issues and experience, and other potential work within scope for the working group. The expectation is that the working group will have fewer presentation slots with more time given over to discussion and comments over reported progress. The working group chairs will agree the topics and agenda time with the responsible area director, with an expectation that priority will be given to operator presentations. If there is consensus to focus on particular problems or issues, then the charter need not be updated, but those topics must be agreed with the responsible area director, and milestones added to track the current work.