Subject: draft-rmcgowan-unicode-procs-02.txt

From: Simon Josefsson <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 18:36:59 +0200

One topic that is important to some people appears to be missing from
this document: what licensing scheme the Unicode Consortium uses for
their standards.  It would be useful to include a discussion on the
differences between how the Unicode standard and IETF documents can be
(re-)distributed and used by implementors.

Specifically: Some parts of the Unicode standards cannot be
redistributed, which has consequences for some implementors that want
to support Unicode with CJK in IETF protocols.