Subject: RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest

From: [email-masked] (Scott Bradner)
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:19:39 -0500 (EST)

whatever the merits of Pete's suggestion I think John makes a very
important point when he says that it would be better to refer to a RFC by
number rather than a BCP by number (and title) because the text can
change while keeping the same BCP number (wwhich can not happen for
RFCs) - this means that the IETF could (in theory) change the rules 
later on and bind to the ISOC to someting they did not get a chance 
to agree to.

iScott

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf