Subject: RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:41:47 -0800

> From: Robert Elz [mailto:[email-masked]] 

> I don't want to continue this, especially as I don't care 
> about this protocol, but ...

>   | In my book deployability trumps pretty much everything else.
> 
> It certainly is important, but being correct (ie: working) is probably
> a little more important...   Avoiding breaking other things is also
> more important.

Which is why the working group has had extensive discussions with the DNS Directorate on this topic. You will be glad to know that you need not worry about it.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf