Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-forces-mib (ForCES MIB) to Proposed Standard

From: "Bert Wijnen \(IETF\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 10:54:07 +0200

I sort of wonder if the Counter32 is the proper datatype for some
of the counters. They sound more like ZeroBasedCounter32 to me.

Further I do not see any text regarding possible discontinuities.

Bert Wijnen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "The IESG" <[email-masked]>
To: "IETF-Announce" <[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:42 PM
Subject: Last Call: draft-ietf-forces-mib (ForCES MIB) to Proposed Standard

> The IESG has received a request from the Forwarding and Control Element
> Separation WG (forces) to consider the following document:
>
> - 'ForCES MIB '
>   <draft-ietf-forces-mib-07.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
> [email-masked] mailing lists by 2008-09-08. Exceptionally,
> comments may be sent to [email-masked] instead. In either case, please
> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-mib-07.txt
>
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=14188&rfc_flag=0
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf