Subject: Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard]

From: Hector Santos <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:08:18 -0500

Shouldn't the document reference RFC5321 and RFC5322 instead of the 
older ones?

-- 
Sincerely

Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com

Dave CROCKER wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> After 5 years and 11 public versions, the email-arch document has 
> finally made its way into the formal IETF standardization process, 
> starting with a Last Call for comments from the community.
> 
> The document is available in several formats from:
> 
>    <http://bbiw.net/recent.html#emailarch>
> 
> The HTML and PDF versions include figures that are markedly easier to 
> view than the ASCII art in the (official) txt version...
> 
> 
> The document is an individual submission.  Although many people have 
> contributed to it, it was not the product of a working group.  So the 
> IESG cannot presume it has support.  Hence, the Last Call of an 
> individual submission carries an extra burden, to assess the amount of 
> support that the document has from the community.  This requires 
> affirmative postings from the community.
> 
> However verbose or terse, positive or negative, it will aid the IESG's 
> assessment to see postings from you about whether to make "Internet Mail 
> Architecture" an IETF standard.  In particular, note the enclosed 
> announcement's:
> 
>      "Please send substantive comments to the [email-masked] mailing 
> lists by 2009-03-26."
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> d/
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail 
> Architecture)     to Proposed Standard
> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:10:17 -0800 (PST)
> From: The IESG <[email-masked]>
> Reply-To: [email-masked]
> To: IETF-Announce <[email-masked]>
> 
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> 
> - 'Internet Mail Architecture '
>    <draft-crocker-email-arch-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
> [email-masked] mailing lists by 2009-03-26. Exceptionally,
> comments may be sent to [email-masked] instead. In either case, please
> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-email-arch-11.txt
> 
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11811&rfc_flag=0 
> 
> 
> The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> 
>