Subject: Re: Releasing xml2rfc 1.34pre3?

From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:21:27 +0200

On 5 jul 2009, at 15:20, Carsten Bormann wrote:

> On Jul 3, 2009, at 19:49, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

>> 1.  The recent boilerplate/process-change events have resulted in a
>> situation where the most-recommended tool for preparing IETF  
>> documents
>> does not work at all in its stable version.

> To me, 1.34pre3 appears to be exactly as stable as 1.33 (modulo the  
> instability inevitably introduced by the 5378 train wreck).

> Would it help to simply call it 1.34 now?

I guess the last round of whining about xml2rfc wasn't sufficient in  
scope and volume, I'm sure the upcoming one will best it on both counts.