Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states (Definition of IETF Working Group Document States) to Informational RFC

From: "Martin J. Dürst" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:51:05 +0900

I'm not sure it's relevant directly for this document, but it would be 
great if this could be fixed anyway in the upcomming work on the tracker:

It has occasionally happened to me that I forgot to update a draft 
before the 6-month deadline. The system then sends a nice mail saying 
that a new draft is overdue, but in terms of states, the draft moves to 
"Dead", and even if a new draft is submitted a day or two after the old 
one expired, the new one also is labeled as "Dead", and as far as I 
remember, it was near impossible to get it out of that state. A draft 
that's a few days old and "Dead" really looks strange :-(.

Regards,    Martin.

On 2010/06/10 0:09, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
>
> - 'Definition of IETF Working Group Document States '
>     <draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-07.txt>  as an Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
> [email-masked] mailing lists by 2010-07-07. Exceptionally,
> comments may be sent to [email-masked] instead. In either case, please
> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-07.txt
>
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=19480&rfc_flag=0
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>

-- 
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:[email-masked]