Subject: Re: [TLS] Second Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions) to Proposed Standard

From: Paul Hoffman <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:40:22 -0700

At 10:21 AM -0700 7/9/10, The IESG wrote:
>The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG
>(tls) to consider the following document:
>
>- 'Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions '
>   <draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-09.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>
>The purpose of this Second IETF Last Call is to confirm some changes
>made as a result of the first IETF Last Call and subsequent
>discussions.  The main issue was handling of the Server name
>indications: dealing with multiple names and dealing with session
>resumption.  Also a discussion in the security considerations on
>why SHA-1 is acceptable for extensions that use it.

I support the new wording for both.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium