Subject: Re: Gen-ART Combined Last Call and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc1948bis-01

From: Fernando Gont <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 05:30:47 -0300

Hi, Ben,

Thanks so much for your review! (and my appologies for the delay in my
response). PLease find my comments inline...

On 11/01/2011 04:55 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:

> Minor issues:
> 
> -- section 3, paragraph after ISN formula: "It is vital that F not be
> computable…"
> 
> If it's vital for security reasons, it seems like this would be
> worthy of normative language.

Agreed. (good grief!)

> -- Appendix B, Removal of "A Common TCP Bug" section:
> 
> Can you comment on why the section was removed?

Yes: it was argued that this information was historical data, and that
if anybody wanted/needed to take a look, they could look at the original
RFC1948.

FWIW, I would have left this section in... but the wg had a different
opinion...

> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> -- abstract
> 
> The abstract should explicitly mention the update to RFC793

Done.

> -- section 1, 2nd paragraph:
> 
> Please expand ISN on first mention

Done.

> -- informative references:
> 
> Is there any way to avoid orphaning the last reference fragment? It's
> confusing to find half a reference at the top of the next page.

I'm sure the RFC-Editor will take care of this.

P.S.: (All my "done", "fixed", etc., are subject to the documents
shepard's agreement ;-) )

Thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: [email-masked] || [email-masked]
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1