Subject: RE: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request

From: [email-masked] (Noel Chiappa)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:12:30 -0500 (EST)

> From: "George, Wes" <[email-masked]>

    > <sarcasm> thanks for that wonderfully relevant and technical rebuttal. 

Err, Ron asked us to stay off this (non-productive) point:

    > From: Ronald Bonica <[email-masked]>
    > Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 17:06:42 -0500

    > By contrast, further discussion of the following topics would not help
    > the IESG gauge consensus:
    > - Does the assignment of the requested /10 enable or hinder the deployment of IPv6?
    > - Is CGN a viable service model for IPv4?

So far I've been trying to be a good boy, and keep quiet about IPv6, so I
hope everyone else can also comply with his request.

	Noel