Subject: Re: DRAFT-IETF-GEOPRIV-RADIUS-LO-23

From: todd glassey <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 06:23:41 -0700

On 04/08/2009 12:12 PM, Anthony Leibovitz wrote:
>
>
>   As an example, Section 1 states that "location information needs to
>   be protected against unauthorized access and distribution", yet
>   nowhere in the document are the implications of this statement for
>   the RADIUS protocol laid out. D
>
Anthony - so what - this is the IETF and there is nothing here mandating 
that any protocol work with another.

If GeoPriv breaks RADIUS that is grounds for more standards work right ???

Nice...

Todd Glassey

-- 
Warning: This message contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the intended recipient), you may not read, use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) thereto without retaining any copies.