Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-02.txt

From: Brian E Carpenter <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:23:17 +1200

Is it just me, or does this sentence now seem like hubris?

>  In fact, the IETF review
>  is more extensive than that done in other SDOs owing to the cross-
>  area technical review performed by the IESG, a position that is
>  further strengthened by the common presence of interoperable running
>  code and implementation before publication as a Proposed Standard.

At the least, I would prefer to see it start thus:

   The IETF review is possibly more extensive than ...

Regards
   Brian