Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-09.txt> (Extending an IPv6 /64 Prefix from a 3GPP Mobile Interface to a LAN link) to Informational RFC

From: Alexandru Petrescu <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:42:50 +0100

The draft says:
> R-4: The UE MUST decrement the TTL when passing packets between IPv6
>       links across the UE.

It should say Hop Limit instead.

>   The LAN link originated RA message carries a copy of the following
>    3GPP radio link received RA message option fields:
>
>    o  MTU (if not provided by the 3GPP network, the UE will provide its
>       3GPP link MTU size)
>    o  Prefix Information

I doubt the MTU on the LAN should the same as on the WAN... they're 
different in nature.

> Below is the general procedure for this scenario:
>
>    1.  The user activates router functionality for a LAN on the UE.

but continues to act as a Host when receiving an RA to configure a next 
hop for the default route.

Alex

Le 07/02/2014 16:20, The IESG a écrit :
>
> The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Operations WG (v6ops) to
> consider the following document:
> - 'Extending an IPv6 /64 Prefix from a 3GPP Mobile Interface to a LAN
>     link'
>    <draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-09.txt> as Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [email-masked] mailing lists by 2014-02-21. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to [email-masked] instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>     This document describes requirements for extending an IPv6 /64 prefix
>     from a User Equipment 3GPP radio interface to a LAN link as well as
>     two implementation examples.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-64share/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-64share/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>
>