Subject: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08

From: Stewart Bryant <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 05:45:03 -0700

Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2017-10-15
IETF LC End Date: 2017-10-25
IESG Telechat date: 2017-10-26

Summary: This is a well written document. There are a couple of things the
authors need to look at, but it is ready to be published

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

The authors should consider whether the 2119 boilerplate is really needed as no
RFC2119 keywords are used (something they point out to the reader) ======

       a query-based interface is used by the the I2NSF Management
       System to obatin information, whereas a report-based interface
SB Typo - obtain
=====

9.2.  Registration Categories

SB> I would think that anything in the IPFIX registry was a candidate for such
categories, after all IPFIX is designed and used  to monitor flows, often for
security reasons.