From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Fri Jul 4 02:07:53 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3DA3A6B14;
Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C738B3A6B14
for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.370,
BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id To+nJ4pTXZs0 for ;
Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.versatel.net (relay.versatel.net [62.250.3.110])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8165B3A6B0D
for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 91723 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2008 09:07:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bwMedion) (87.215.199.34)
by relay.versatel.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2008 09:07:58 -0000
From: "Bert Wijnen - IETF"
To: "Netconf"
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:08:04 +0200
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Importance: Normal
Subject: [Netconf] We need to prepare for the NETCONF Session at IETF 72
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi All,
we are happy to get the Notification draft through the
IESG. Now it's in the hands of the RFC editor.
Anyway, we still have three chartered WG items running
and they are available for your review:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-03
As you know, NETCONF WG session at IETF 72 is currently
scheduled for Thuesday at 18:50-19:50.
We would like to encourage everybody on the NETCONF
mailing list to READ AND REVIEW the document updates and
send their review comments and requests to the mailing list.
The issue discussion is definitely needed before the WG
session and is the only way to get the issues solved and
the documents stable.
As usual the WG session time is PRIMARILY for the discussion
of ISSUES, which we couldn't solve on the maillist.
Authors: Please bring not-solved issues into the session discussion.
Thank you all for your support.
Bert & Mehmet
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Fri Jul 4 02:07:53 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3DA3A6B14;
Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C738B3A6B14
for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.370,
BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id To+nJ4pTXZs0 for ;
Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.versatel.net (relay.versatel.net [62.250.3.110])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8165B3A6B0D
for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 91723 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2008 09:07:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bwMedion) (87.215.199.34)
by relay.versatel.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2008 09:07:58 -0000
From: "Bert Wijnen - IETF"
To: "Netconf"
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:08:04 +0200
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Importance: Normal
Subject: [Netconf] We need to prepare for the NETCONF Session at IETF 72
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi All,
we are happy to get the Notification draft through the
IESG. Now it's in the hands of the RFC editor.
Anyway, we still have three chartered WG items running
and they are available for your review:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-03
As you know, NETCONF WG session at IETF 72 is currently
scheduled for Thuesday at 18:50-19:50.
We would like to encourage everybody on the NETCONF
mailing list to READ AND REVIEW the document updates and
send their review comments and requests to the mailing list.
The issue discussion is definitely needed before the WG
session and is the only way to get the issues solved and
the documents stable.
As usual the WG session time is PRIMARILY for the discussion
of ISSUES, which we couldn't solve on the maillist.
Authors: Please bring not-solved issues into the session discussion.
Thank you all for your support.
Bert & Mehmet
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Fri Jul 4 02:21:49 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD1A3A6B46;
Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCBE3A6B46
for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.115,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id EADbpYP0eCfR for ;
Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.versatel.net (relay.versatel.net [62.250.3.110])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EBE1B3A6B0D
for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8360 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2008 09:21:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bwMedion) (87.215.199.34)
by relay.versatel.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2008 09:21:54 -0000
From: "Bert Wijnen - IETF"
To: "netconf mailing list"
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:22:00 +0200
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
In-Reply-To:
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Protocol Action: 'NETCONF Event
Notifications'toProposed Standard
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi,
I am back from vacation now (en I ENjoied it a lot; 2-3 weeks
of bicycling (modest distances, like less than 50km a day with
timely stops for a yellowish juice or red wine.)
and relaxing).
Anyway... this posting is to thank you all for your efforts on
the notifications draft and to congratulate the WG for the
fact that we have passed IESG approval. Special thanks to the
authors/editors (Sharon and Hector).
Bert Wijnen
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: netconf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org]Namens
> Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Muenich)
> Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2008 17:33
> Aan: netconf mailing list
> Onderwerp: Re: [Netconf] Protocol Action: 'NETCONF Event
> Notifications'toProposed Standard
>
>
>
> I think special thanks go to the editors and the former
> WG chairs, who did a tremendous work.
>
> BTW: Not to forget the document shepherd joining his
> vacation currently.
>
> Cheers,
> Mehmet
>
>
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Fri Jul 4 02:21:49 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD1A3A6B46;
Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCBE3A6B46
for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.115,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id EADbpYP0eCfR for ;
Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.versatel.net (relay.versatel.net [62.250.3.110])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EBE1B3A6B0D
for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8360 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2008 09:21:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bwMedion) (87.215.199.34)
by relay.versatel.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2008 09:21:54 -0000
From: "Bert Wijnen - IETF"
To: "netconf mailing list"
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:22:00 +0200
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
In-Reply-To:
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Protocol Action: 'NETCONF Event
Notifications'toProposed Standard
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi,
I am back from vacation now (en I ENjoied it a lot; 2-3 weeks
of bicycling (modest distances, like less than 50km a day with
timely stops for a yellowish juice or red wine.)
and relaxing).
Anyway... this posting is to thank you all for your efforts on
the notifications draft and to congratulate the WG for the
fact that we have passed IESG approval. Special thanks to the
authors/editors (Sharon and Hector).
Bert Wijnen
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: netconf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org]Namens
> Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Muenich)
> Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2008 17:33
> Aan: netconf mailing list
> Onderwerp: Re: [Netconf] Protocol Action: 'NETCONF Event
> Notifications'toProposed Standard
>
>
>
> I think special thanks go to the editors and the former
> WG chairs, who did a tremendous work.
>
> BTW: Not to forget the document shepherd joining his
> vacation currently.
>
> Cheers,
> Mehmet
>
>
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Mon Jul 7 14:09:44 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D3E28C241;
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A678128C241
for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 8EeFXDW6SxEP for ;
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com (zrtps0kn.nortel.com [47.140.192.55])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909CE28C23B
for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com
[47.129.230.99])
by zrtps0kn.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id
m67L9kR29001 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:09:46 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F"
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:09:28 -0400
Message-ID: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4155A2567@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: I-D Action:draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcjgdRnapLxzL17RRpWdYodYavx2bgAACasw
From: "Sharon Chisholm"
To:
Subject: [Netconf] FW: I-D Action:draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi
The following draft defines standard content for NETCONF Notifications,
with an aim to support full-lifecycle configuration management. This
work was deferred from the original NETCONF Notification protocol work
because of the separation of protocol and content and was brought up at
the mike (by someone other then the authors) at the last IETF meeting as
a gap in our NETCONF solution.
We would like to discuss this work at the upcoming meeting in Dublin.
Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org
[mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 5:00 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action:draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
Title : NETCONF Notification Content
Author(s) : S. Chisholm, et al.
Filename : draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.txt
Pages : 29
Date : 2008-07-07
The NETCONF Event Notifications standard specifies the mechanism by
which NETCONF clients can subscribe to and receive event notifications.
However, with the exception of a timestamp, no standard Notification
content was defined. This memo defines a set of information that shouFrom netconf-bounces@ietf.org Mon Jul 7 14:09:44 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D3E28C241;
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A678128C241
for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 8EeFXDW6SxEP for ;
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com (zrtps0kn.nortel.com [47.140.192.55])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909CE28C23B
for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com
[47.129.230.99])
by zrtps0kn.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id
m67L9kR29001 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:09:46 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F"
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:09:28 -0400
Message-ID: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4155A2567@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: I-D Action:draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcjgdRnapLxzL17RRpWdYodYavx2bgAACasw
From: "Sharon Chisholm"
To:
Subject: [Netconf] FW: I-D Action:draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi
The following draft defines standard content for NETCONF Notifications,
with an aim to support full-lifecycle configuration management. This
work was deferred from the original NETCONF Notification protocol work
because of the separation of protocol and content and was brought up at
the mike (by someone other then the authors) at the last IETF meeting as
a gap in our NETCONF solution.
We would like to discuss this work at the upcoming meeting in Dublin.
Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org
[mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 5:00 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action:draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
Title : NETCONF Notification Content
Author(s) : S. Chisholm, et al.
Filename : draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.txt
Pages : 29
Date : 2008-07-07
The NETCONF Event Notifications standard specifies the mechanism by
which NETCONF clients can subscribe to and receive event notifications.
However, with the exception of a timestamp, no standard Notification
content was defined. This memo defines a set of information thald
be included in all NETCONF notifications, information that should be
included based on class of notification and also defines a set of
specific notifications to support specific management functions, such as
configuration.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-0
0.txt
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name="draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.URL"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.URL
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.URL"
W0ludGVybmV0U2hvcnRjdXRdDQpVUkw9ZnRwOi8vZnRwLmlldGYub3JnL2ludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0
cy9kcmFmdC1jaGlzaG9sbS1uZXRjb25mLW5vdC1jb250ZW50LTAwLnR4dA0K
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="ATT2645947.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: ATT2645947.txt
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="ATT2645947.txt"
X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCkktRC1Bbm5v
dW5jZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCkktRC1Bbm5vdW5jZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0
Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pLWQtYW5ub3VuY2UNCkludGVybmV0LURyYWZ0IGRpcmVj
dG9yaWVzOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL3NoYWRvdy5odG1sDQpvciBmdHA6Ly9mdHAuaWV0
Zi5vcmcvaWV0Zi8xc2hhZG93LXNpdGVzLnR4dA0K
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F--
t should
be included in all NETCONF notifications, information that should be
included based on class of notification and also defines a set of
specific notifications to support specific management functions, such as
configuration.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-0
0.txt
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name="draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.URL"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.URL
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00.URL"
W0ludGVybmV0U2hvcnRjdXRdDQpVUkw9ZnRwOi8vZnRwLmlldGYub3JnL2ludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0
cy9kcmFmdC1jaGlzaG9sbS1uZXRjb25mLW5vdC1jb250ZW50LTAwLnR4dA0K
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="ATT2645947.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: ATT2645947.txt
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="ATT2645947.txt"
X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCkktRC1Bbm5v
dW5jZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCkktRC1Bbm5vdW5jZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0
Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pLWQtYW5ub3VuY2UNCkludGVybmV0LURyYWZ0IGRpcmVj
dG9yaWVzOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL3NoYWRvdy5odG1sDQpvciBmdHA6Ly9mdHAuaWV0
Zi5vcmcvaWV0Zi8xc2hhZG93LXNpdGVzLnR4dA0K
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E075.BF56E33F--
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Wed Jul 9 06:49:22 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A36A28C13F;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D03D28C123
for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id zMS+nYWnPl1I for ;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net
[217.115.75.234])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084A028C141
for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56])
by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
m69DnSPL012410
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:49:29 +0200
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (webmail.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35])
by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP
id m69DnRFE014558; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:49:28 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC005.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.103]) by
demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:49:27 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:49:26 +0200
Message-ID:
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
Thread-Index: Acjhuf/QXxkZOGOIQlCyUbt9UTuHWgAD+cVg
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Muenich)"
To: "netconf mailing list"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2008 13:49:27.0934 (UTC)
FILETIME=[9AF351E0:01C8E1CA]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-7.0.0.1584-5.5.1027-16020.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--24.566300-8.000000-31
Subject: [Netconf] Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0930240100=="
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0930240100==
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CA.9A6F115B"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CA.9A6F115B
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Dear NETCONF WG,
>=20
> below is the draft agenda for the NETCONF WG session=20
> at the IETF #72. If you feel that some topic is missing, pls=20
> let us know asap.
>=20
> Our main focus in the session will be on open issue=20
> discussion. However, until now there was not much=20
> discussion in the list except the TLS draft.
>=20
> Please let us also know whether you have any concrete=20
> topic for the open mic session.
>=20
> We need to organize (as always) the scribes and minute=20
> From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Wed Jul 9 06:49:22 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A36A28C13F;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D03D28C123
for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id zMS+nYWnPl1I for ;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net
[217.115.75.234])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084A028C141
for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56])
by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
m69DnSPL012410
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:49:29 +0200
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (webmail.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35])
by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP
id m69DnRFE014558; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:49:28 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC005.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.103]) by
demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:49:27 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:49:26 +0200
Message-ID:
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
Thread-Index: Acjhuf/QXxkZOGOIQlCyUbt9UTuHWgAD+cVg
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Muenich)"
To: "netconf mailing list"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2008 13:49:27.0934 (UTC)
FILETIME=[9AF351E0:01C8E1CA]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-7.0.0.1584-5.5.1027-16020.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--24.566300-8.000000-31
Subject: [Netconf] Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0930240100=="
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0930240100==
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CA.9A6F115B"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CA.9A6F115B
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Dear NETCONF WG,
>=20
> below is the draft agenda for the NETCONF WG session=20
> at the IETF #72. If you feel that some topic is missing, pls=20
> let us know asap.
>=20
> Our main focus in the session will be on open issue=20
> discussion. However, until now there was not much=20
> discussion in the list except the TLS draft.
>=20
> Please let us also know whether you have any concrete=20
> topic for the open mic session.
>=20
> We need to organize (as always) the scribes and minute=20
> takerstakers before the meeting. Volunteers are appreciated.
>=20
> Bert & Mehmet
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> NETCONF WG=20
> IETF 72, Dublin, Ireland=20
>=20
> TUESDAY, July 29, 2008 1850-1950=20
>=20
> WG Chairs:=20
> Bert Wijnen =20
> Mehmet Ersue =20
>=20
> Scribes,=20
> Agenda bashing,=20
> WG status review (5 minutes)=20
>=20
> Current charter items:=20
>=20
> 1. Netconf monitoring (15 minutes)=20
> Marc Scott=20
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-02
>=20
> =20
> 2. Fine-grained locking (15 minutes)=20
> Balazs Lengyel=20
> =20
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-02=20
>=20
> 3. NETCONF over TLS (15 minutes)=20
> Mohamad Badra=20
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-03=20
>=20
> Not-chartered document: (5 minutes)=20
> NETCONF Notification Content=20
> Sharon Chisholm=20
> =20
> AOB=20
>=20
> Open mic (5 minutes)=20
> Hot topics to discuss?=20
>=20
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CA.9A6F115B
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
Dear NETCONF =
WG,
below is the draft agenda for the NETCONF WG session
at the IETF #72. If you feel that some topic is missing, pls
let us know asap.
Our main focus in the session will be on open issue
discussion. However, until now there was not much
discussion in the list except the TLS draft.
Please let us also know whether you have any concrete
topic for the open mic session.
We need to organize (as always) the scribes and minute
takers before the meeting. Volunteers are appreciated.
Bert & Mehmet
-------------------------------------------------------
NETCONF WG =
IETF 72, =
Dublin, Ireland
TUESDAY, July =
29, 2008 1850-1950
WG =
Chairs:
Bert =
Wijnen <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
Mehmet =
Ersue <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
Scribes, =
Agenda =
bashing,
WG =
status review (5 minutes)
=
Current charter items:
1. Netconf =
monitoring (15 minutes)
&n=
bsp; Marc Scott
&n=
bsp; http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring=
-02=20
> Bert & Mehmet
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> NETCONF WG=20
> IETF 72, Dublin, Ireland=20
>=20
> TUESDAY, July 29, 2008 1850-1950=20
>=20
> WG Chairs:=20
> Bert Wijnen =20
> Mehmet Ersue =20
>=20
> Scribes,=20
> Agenda bashing,=20
> WG status review (5 minutes)=20
>=20
> Current charter items:=20
>=20
> 1. Netconf monitoring (15 minutes)=20
> Marc Scott=20
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-02
>=20
> =20
> 2. Fine-grained locking (15 minutes)=20
> Balazs Lengyel=20
> =20
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-02=20
>=20
> 3. NETCONF over TLS (15 minutes)=20
> Mohamad Badra=20
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-03=20
>=20
> Not-chartered document: (5 minutes)=20
> NETCONF Notification Content=20
> Sharon Chisholm=20
> =20
> AOB=20
>=20
> Open mic (5 minutes)=20
> Hot topics to discuss?=20
>=20
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CA.9A6F115B
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
Dear NETCONF =
WG,
below is the draft agenda for the NETCONF WG session
at the IETF #72. If you feel that some topic is missing, pls
let us know asap.
Our main focus in the session will be on open issue
discussion. However, until now there was not much
discussion in the list except the TLS draft.
Please let us also know whether you have any concrete
topic for the open mic session.
We need to organize (as always) the scribes and minute
takers before the meeting. Volunteers are appreciated.
Bert & Mehmet
-------------------------------------------------------
NETCONF WG =
IETF 72, =
Dublin, Ireland
TUESDAY, July =
29, 2008 1850-1950
WG =
Chairs:
Bert =
Wijnen <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
Mehmet =
Ersue <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
Scribes, =
Agenda =
bashing,
WG =
status review (5 minutes)
=
Current charter items:
1. Netconf =
monitoring (15 minutes)
&n=
bsp; Marc Scott
&n=
bsp; http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring=
-02
=
2. Fine-grained =
locking (15 minutes)
&n=
bsp; Balazs Lengyel
&n=
bsp; http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lo=
ck-02
3. NETCONF =
over TLS (15 minutes)
&n=
bsp; Mohamad Badra
&n=
bsp; http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-03 =
=
Not-chartered document: (5 minutes)
NETCONF Notification =
Content
Sharon Chisholm =
AOB =
Open mic (5 =
minutes)
Hot topics to discuss? =
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CA.9A6F115B--
--===============0930240100==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
--===============0930240100==--
T SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Verdana">
=
2. Fine-grained =
locking (15 minutes)
&n=
bsp; Balazs Lengyel
&n=
bsp; http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lo=
ck-02
3. NETCONF =
over TLS (15 minutes)
&n=
bsp; Mohamad Badra
&n=
bsp; http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-03 =
=
Not-chartered document: (5 minutes)
NETCONF Notification =
Content
Sharon Chisholm =
AOB =
Open mic (5 =
minutes)
Hot topics to discuss? =
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CA.9A6F115B--
--===============0930240100==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
--===============0930240100==--
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Wed Jul 9 07:24:28 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2143A68E8;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31273A6897
for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id mVI5AvVmEL3j for ;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net
[217.115.75.234])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873F33A68E8
for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55])
by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
m69EOXp0002279
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:24:33 +0200
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (webmail.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35])
by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP
id m69EOVPP015435; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:24:33 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC005.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.103]) by
demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:24:31 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CF.8095BED3"
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:24:31 +0200
Message-ID:
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Updated Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
Thread-Index: Acjhuf/QXxkZOGOIQlCyUbt9UTuHWgAD+cVgAADgYQA=
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Muenich)"
To: "netconf mailing list"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2008 14:24:31.0914 (UTC)
FILETIME=[810530A0:01C8E1CF]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-7.0.0.1584-5.5.1027-16020.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--18.256000-8.000000-31
Subject: [Netconf] Updated Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CF.8095BED3
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C8E1CF.8095BED3"
------_=_NextPart_002_01C8E1CF.8095BED3
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,
=20
I updated the agenda with the URL of the Notification content=20
draft. Please read and comment it.
=20
Please feel free to indicate if something is missing in the agenda.
=20
Mehmet=20
=20
-------------------------------------------------------=20
=20
NETCONF WG=20
IETF 72, Dublin, Ireland=20
TUESDAY, July 29, 2008 1850-1950=20
WG Chairs:=20
Bert Wijnen =20
Mehmet Ersue =20
Scribes,=20
Agenda bashing,=20
WG status review (5 minutes)=20
Current charter items:=20
1. Netconf monitoring (15 minutes)=20
Mark Scott=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-02
=20
=20
2. Fine-grained locking (15 minutes)=20
Balazs Lengyel=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-02
=20
3. NETCONF over TLS (15 minutes)=20
Mohamad Badra=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-03
=20
Not-chartered document: (5 minutes)=20
NETCONF Notification Content=20
Sharon Chisholm=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00=20
=20
AOB=20
Open mic (5 minutes)=20
Hot topics to discuss?=20
------_=_NextPart_002_01C8E1CF.8095BED3
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
Hi=20
All,
I updated the agenda with the URL of the Notification content =
draft. Please read and comment it.
Please=20
feel free to indicate if something is missing in=20
the agenda.
Mehmet
-----------------------------=
--------------------------
NETCONF WG =
IETF 72, Dublin, Ireland=20
TUESDAY, July 29, 2008 1850-1950
WG Chairs:
Bert Wijnen <bertietf@bwijnen.net> =
Mehmet Ersue=20
<mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
Scribes,
Agenda bashing,
WG status review (5 minutes) =
Current charter items:
1. Netconf monitoring (15 =
minutes)=20
=
Mark Scott
=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-02=20
=20
2. Fine-grained locking =
(15 minutes)=20
=
Balazs=20
Lengyel
=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-02
3. NETCONF over TLS =
(15=20
minutes)
&nbs=
p;=20
Mohamad Badra
&nbs=
p;=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-03<=
/SPAN>
Not-chartered document: (5 minutes) =
=
NETCONF=20
Notification Content
Sharon Chisholm
=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00
AOB
Open mic (5 minutes)
Hot topics to =
discuss?=20
------_=_NextPart_002_01C8E1CF.8095BED3--
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CF.8095BED3
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="ATT524510.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: ATT524510.txt
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="ATT524510.txt"
X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCk5ldGNvbmYg
bWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpOZXRjb25mQGlldGYub3JnDQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWls
bWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL25ldGNvbmYNCg==
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CF.8095BED3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CF.8095BED3--
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Wed Jul 9 07:24:28 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2143A68E8;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31273A6897
for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id mVI5AvVmEL3j for ;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net
[217.115.75.234])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873F33A68E8
for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55])
by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
m69EOXp0002279
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:24:33 +0200
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (webmail.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35])
by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP
id m69EOVPP015435; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:24:33 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC005.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.103]) by
demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:24:31 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CF.8095BED3"
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:24:31 +0200
Message-ID:
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Updated Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
Thread-Index: Acjhuf/QXxkZOGOIQlCyUbt9UTuHWgAD+cVgAADgYQA=
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Muenich)"
To: "netconf mailing list"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2008 14:24:31.0914 (UTC)
FILETIME=[810530A0:01C8E1CF]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-7.0.0.1584-5.5.1027-16020.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--18.256000-8.000000-31
Subject: [Netconf] Updated Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CF.8095BED3
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C8E1CF.8095BED3"
------_=_NextPart_002_01C8E1CF.8095BED3
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,
=20
I updated the agenda with the URL of the Notification content=20
draft. Please read and comment it.
=20
Please feel free to indicate if something is missing in the agenda.
=20
Mehmet=20
=20
-------------------------------------------------------=20
=20
NETCONF WG=20
IETF 72, Dublin, Ireland=20
TUESDAY, July 29, 2008 1850-1950=20
WG Chairs:=20
Bert Wijnen =20
Mehmet Ersue =20
Scribes,=20
Agenda bashing,=20
WG status review (5 minutes)=20
Current charter items:=20
1. Netconf monitoring (15 minutes)=20
Mark Scott=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-02
=20
=20
2. Fine-grained locking (15 minutes)=20
Balazs Lengyel=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-02
=20
3. NETCONF over TLS (15 minutes)=20
Mohamad Badra=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-03
=20
Not-chartered document: (5 minutes)=20
NETCONF Notification Content=20
Sharon Chisholm=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00=20
=20
AOB=20
Open mic (5 minutes)=20
Hot topics to discuss?=20
------_=_NextPart_002_01C8E1CF.8095BED3
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Agenda for the IETF #72 NETCONF Session
Hi=20
All,
I updated the agenda with the URL of the Notification content =
draft. Please read and comment it.
Please=20
feel free to indicate if something is missing in=20
the agenda.
Mehmet
-----------------------------=
--------------------------
NETCONF WG =
IETF 72, Dublin, Ireland=20
TUESDAY, July 29, 2008 1850-1950
WG Chairs:
Bert Wijnen <bertietf@bwijnen.net> =
Mehmet Ersue=20
<mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
Scribes,
Agenda bashing,
WG status review (5 minutes) =
Current charter items:
1. Netconf monitoring (15 =
minutes)=20
=
Mark Scott
=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-02=20
=20
2. Fine-grained locking =
(15 minutes)=20
=
Balazs=20
Lengyel
=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-02
3. NETCONF over TLS =
(15=20
minutes)
&nbs=
p;=20
Mohamad Badra
&nbs=
p;=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-03<=
/SPAN>
Not-chartered document: (5 minutes) =
=
NETCONF=20
Notification Content
Sharon Chisholm
=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chisholm-netconf-not-content-00
AOB
Open mic (5 minutes)
Hot topics to =
discuss?=20
------_=_NextPart_002_01C8E1CF.8095BED3--
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CF.8095BED3
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="ATT524510.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: ATT524510.txt
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="ATT524510.txt"
X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCk5ldGNvbmYg
bWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpOZXRjb25mQGlldGYub3JnDQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWls
bWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL25ldGNvbmYNCg==
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CF.8095BED3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E1CF.8095BED3--
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Thu Jul 10 06:53:22 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E610F28C0DD;
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464493A6A10
for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id a46AAI-nsBtL for ;
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com (zrtps0kn.nortel.com [47.140.192.55])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304813A6A16
for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com
[47.129.230.99])
by zrtps0kn.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id
m6ADrVi16780 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:53:32 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:51:56 -0400
Message-ID: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B415642CDE@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4153961FC@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
Thread-Index: AcjXvDUnAlzSayBCSNWKgcgVm0Zo1gK15UKw
References: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4153961FC@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
From: "Sharon Chisholm"
To:
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi
For some internal stuff I need clarification on the first point. As
such, I propose that the given list of statistics be clarified to just
be for NETCONF. This would not preclude adding additional statistics in
the future that go beyond this (current number of sessions for example
might include CLI sessions).
Please let me know if this is not a reasonable approach.
Thanks,
Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Chisholm, Sharon (CAR:ZZ00)
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:41 PM
To: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
Hi
1. If the statistics are limited to NETCONF traffic, this should be
clarified in the description clauses. Since we discuss CLI sessions in
another part of the data model, this is not completely obvious.
2. For consistency with other NETCONF specifications, the protocol
operation definition should be broken out separately from the content
definition.
3. Should any of the parameters to the verb be optional?
Currently they are all mandatory. If my device only has XSDs, do I
really have to specify this parameter every single time?
Sharon Chisholm
Nortel
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Thu Jul 10 06:53:22 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E610F28C0DD;
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464493A6A10
for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id a46AAI-nsBtL for ;
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com (zrtps0kn.nortel.com [47.140.192.55])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304813A6A16
for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com
[47.129.230.99])
by zrtps0kn.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id
m6ADrVi16780 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:53:32 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:51:56 -0400
Message-ID: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B415642CDE@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4153961FC@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
Thread-Index: AcjXvDUnAlzSayBCSNWKgcgVm0Zo1gK15UKw
References: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4153961FC@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
From: "Sharon Chisholm"
To:
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi
For some internal stuff I need clarification on the first point. As
such, I propose that the given list of statistics be clarified to just
be for NETCONF. This would not preclude adding additional statistics in
the future that go beyond this (current number of sessions for example
might include CLI sessions).
Please let me know if this is not a reasonable approach.
Thanks,
Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Chisholm, Sharon (CAR:ZZ00)
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:41 PM
To: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
Hi
1. If the statistics are limited to NETCONF traffic, this should be
clarified in the description clauses. Since we discuss CLI sessions in
another part of the data model, this is not completely obvious.
2. For consistency with other NETCONF specifications, the protocol
operation definition should be broken out separately from the content
definition.
3. Should any of the parameters to the verb be optional?
Currently they are all mandatory. If my device only has XSDs, do I
really have to specify this parameter every single time?
Sharon Chisholm
Nortel
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/lisnetconf
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
tinfo/netconf
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Thu Jul 10 07:19:34 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178883A6A2C;
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F643A6960
for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id UK0wZD5CqXjq for ;
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com
(co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53723A6912
for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,338,1212379200"; d="scan'208";a="134899580"
Received: from unknown (HELO nj300815-nj-erheast.avaya.com) ([198.152.6.5])
by co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2008 10:19:45 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,338,1212379200"; d="scan'208";a="226389627"
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.14])
by nj300815-nj-erheast-out.avaya.com with ESMTP;
10 Jul 2008 10:19:44 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:19:43 +0200
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B415642CDE@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
Thread-Index: AcjXvDUnAlzSayBCSNWKgcgVm0Zo1gK15UKwAAEGdkA=
References: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4153961FC@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
<713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B415642CDE@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)"
To: "Sharon Chisholm" ,
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
All this looks reasonable to me.
And all this stuff is useful.
Dan
(contributor opinion)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sharon Chisholm
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:52 PM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
>
> Hi
>
> For some internal stuff I need clarification on the first
> point. As such, I propose that the given list of statistics
> be clarified to just be for NETCONF. This would not preclude
> adding additional statistics in the future that go beyond
> this (current number of sessions for example might include
> CLI sessions).
>
> Please let me know if this is not a reasonable approach.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sharon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chisholm,
> Sharon (CAR:ZZ00)
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:41 PM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
>
> Hi
>
> 1. If the statistics are limited to NETCONF traffic, this
> should be clarified in the description clauses. Since we
> discuss CLI sessions in another part of the data model, this
> is not completely obvious.
>
> 2. For consistency with other NETCONF specifications, the
> protocol operation definition should be broken out separately
> from the content definition.
>
> 3. Should any of the parameters to the verb be optional?
> Currently they are all mandatory. If my device only has XSDs,
> do I really have to specify this parameter every single time?
>
> Sharon Chisholm
> Nortel
> Ottawa, Ontario
> Canada
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Thu Jul 10 07:19:34 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178883A6A2C;
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F643A6960
for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id UK0wZD5CqXjq for ;
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com
(co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53723A6912
for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,338,1212379200"; d="scan'208";a="134899580"
Received: from unknown (HELO nj300815-nj-erheast.avaya.com) ([198.152.6.5])
by co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2008 10:19:45 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,338,1212379200"; d="scan'208";a="226389627"
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.14])
by nj300815-nj-erheast-out.avaya.com with ESMTP;
10 Jul 2008 10:19:44 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:19:43 +0200
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B415642CDE@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
Thread-Index: AcjXvDUnAlzSayBCSNWKgcgVm0Zo1gK15UKwAAEGdkA=
References: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4153961FC@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
<713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B415642CDE@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)"
To: "Sharon Chisholm" ,
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
All this looks reasonable to me.
And all this stuff is useful.
Dan
(contributor opinion)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sharon Chisholm
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:52 PM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
>
> Hi
>
> For some internal stuff I need clarification on the first
> point. As such, I propose that the given list of statistics
> be clarified to just be for NETCONF. This would not preclude
> adding additional statistics in the future that go beyond
> this (current number of sessions for example might include
> CLI sessions).
>
> Please let me know if this is not a reasonable approach.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sharon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chisholm,
> Sharon (CAR:ZZ00)
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:41 PM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
>
> Hi
>
> 1. If the statistics are limited to NETCONF traffic, this
> should be clarified in the description clauses. Since we
> discuss CLI sessions in another part of the data model, this
> is not completely obvious.
>
> 2. For consistency with other NETCONF specifications, the
> protocol operation definition should be broken out separately
> from the content definition.
>
> 3. Should any of the parameters to the verb be optional?
> Currently they are all mandatory. If my device only has XSDs,
> do I really have to specify this parameter every single time?
>
> Sharon Chisholm
> Nortel
> Ottawa, Ontario
> Canada
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Thu Jul 17 09:34:21 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4ABE3A6AAB;
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847CB3A6AAB
for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id NUgJpsiabldz for ;
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com (zrtps0kn.nortel.com [47.140.192.55])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC3F3A6AA7
for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcarhxm1.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm1.corp.nortel.com
[47.129.230.97])
by zrtps0kn.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id
m6HGYl129366 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:34:48 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:34:40 -0400
Message-ID: <183DD1B052A11A40B76125E42F1CBAAB1304D579@zcarhxm1.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To:
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
Thread-Index: AcjXvDUnAlzSayBCSNWKgcgVm0Zo1gK15UKwAAEGdkABYre2wA==
References: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4153961FC@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
<713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B415642CDE@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
From: "Mark Scott"
To: "Sharon Chisholm" ,
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Sharon,
Points 1 and 2 can be updated in next version.
On Point 3 my preference would be to keep the 'format' parameter
mandatory.
My thinking here:
It encourages a manager to specifically request the format of interest.
I also think it helps to simplify cases like this:
- device has only one format for a specific schema
- likely rare but each schema may not be the same format
- manager can send without 'format' parameter
- device returns whatever format it has for that identifier and version
- manager has to either cross-check the schema-list entry or the result
contents to confirm the format
- later, a new instance of same schema (in another format) is added
- manager still sends without 'format', would we expect:
A) to return an error indicating format not specified?
Effectively making the parm mandatory
B) return a 'default format'? In which case would be need to
define and advertise the default format? However, this won't work in
cases where a device doesn't have a schema in the default format;
unless the device enforced the presence of at least the default format
but that's putting too many resFrom netconf-bounces@ietf.org Thu Jul 17 09:34:21 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4ABE3A6AAB;
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847CB3A6AAB
for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id NUgJpsiabldz for ;
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com (zrtps0kn.nortel.com [47.140.192.55])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC3F3A6AA7
for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcarhxm1.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm1.corp.nortel.com
[47.129.230.97])
by zrtps0kn.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id
m6HGYl129366 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:34:48 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:34:40 -0400
Message-ID: <183DD1B052A11A40B76125E42F1CBAAB1304D579@zcarhxm1.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To:
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
Thread-Index: AcjXvDUnAlzSayBCSNWKgcgVm0Zo1gK15UKwAAEGdkABYre2wA==
References: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4153961FC@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
<713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B415642CDE@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
From: "Mark Scott"
To: "Sharon Chisholm" ,
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Sharon,
Points 1 and 2 can be updated in next version.
On Point 3 my preference would be to keep the 'format' parameter
mandatory.
My thinking here:
It encourages a manager to specifically request the format of interest.
I also think it helps to simplify cases like this:
- device has only one format for a specific schema
- likely rare but each schema may not be the same format
- manager can send without 'format' parameter
- device returns whatever format it has for that identifier and version
- manager has to either cross-check the schema-list entry or the result
contents to confirm the format
- later, a new instance of same schema (in another format) is added
- manager still sends without 'format', would we expect:
A) to return an error indicating format not specified?
Effectively making the parm mandatory
B) return a 'default format'? In which case would be need to
define and advertise the default format? However, this won't work in
cases where a device doesn't have a schema in the default format;
unless the device enforced the presence of at least the default format
but that's putting too many restrictitrictions on the device in my opinion
So I'd like to just keep it simple with the mandatory parameter.
I'm open to discussion though.
thx,
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sharon Chisholm
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:52 PM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
>
> Hi
>
> For some internal stuff I need clarification on the first point. As
> such, I propose that the given list of statistics be clarified to just
> be for NETCONF. This would not preclude adding additional statistics
> in the future that go beyond this (current number of sessions for
> example might include CLI sessions).
>
> Please let me know if this is not a reasonable approach.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sharon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chisholm, Sharon
> (CAR:ZZ00)
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:41 PM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
>
> Hi
>
> 1. If the statistics are limited to NETCONF traffic, this should be
> clarified in the description clauses. Since we discuss CLI sessions in
> another part of the data model, this is not completely obvious.
>
> 2. For consistency with other NETCONF specifications, the protocol
> operation definition should be broken out separately from the content
> definition.
>
> 3. Should any of the parameters to the verb be optional?
> Currently they are all mandatory. If my device only has XSDs, do I
> really have to specify this parameter every single time?
>
> Sharon Chisholm
> Nortel
> Ottawa, Ontario
> Canada
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
ons on the device in my opinion
So I'd like to just keep it simple with the mandatory parameter.
I'm open to discussion though.
thx,
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sharon Chisholm
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:52 PM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
>
> Hi
>
> For some internal stuff I need clarification on the first point. As
> such, I propose that the given list of statistics be clarified to just
> be for NETCONF. This would not preclude adding additional statistics
> in the future that go beyond this (current number of sessions for
> example might include CLI sessions).
>
> Please let me know if this is not a reasonable approach.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sharon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chisholm, Sharon
> (CAR:ZZ00)
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:41 PM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft
>
> Hi
>
> 1. If the statistics are limited to NETCONF traffic, this should be
> clarified in the description clauses. Since we discuss CLI sessions in
> another part of the data model, this is not completely obvious.
>
> 2. For consistency with other NETCONF specifications, the protocol
> operation definition should be broken out separately from the content
> definition.
>
> 3. Should any of the parameters to the verb be optional?
> Currently they are all mandatory. If my device only has XSDs, do I
> really have to specify this parameter every single time?
>
> Sharon Chisholm
> Nortel
> Ottawa, Ontario
> Canada
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Sat Jul 19 08:02:22 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B543A691A;
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433683A696C;
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.077
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AWL=-0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6,
USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id t6p7YaEzYHsp; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bosco.isi.edu (bosco.isi.edu [128.9.168.207])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4C63A6954;
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bosco.isi.edu (Postfix, from userid 70)
id 152CE1443E6; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20080718234001.152CE1443E6@bosco.isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:02:21 -0700
Cc: netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Netconf] RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5277
Title: NETCONF Event Notifications
Author: S. Chisholm, H. Trevino
Status: Standards Track
Date: July 2008
Mailbox: schishol@nortel.com,
htrevino@cisco.com
Pages: 35
Characters: 70878
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-netconf-notification-14.txt
URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5277.txt
This document defines mechanisms that provide an asynchronous message
notification delivery service for the Network Configuration protocol
(NETCONF). This is an optional capability built on top of the base
NETCONF definition. This document defines the capabilities and
operations necessary to support this service. [STANDARDS TRACK]
This document is a product of the Network Configuration Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Sat Jul 19 08:02:22 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B543A691A;
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433683A696C;
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.077
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AWL=-0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6,
USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id t6p7YaEzYHsp; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bosco.isi.edu (bosco.isi.edu [128.9.168.207])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4C63A6954;
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bosco.isi.edu (Postfix, from userid 70)
id 152CE1443E6; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20080718234001.152CE1443E6@bosco.isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:02:21 -0700
Cc: netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Netconf] RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5277
Title: NETCONF Event Notifications
Author: S. Chisholm, H. Trevino
Status: Standards Track
Date: July 2008
Mailbox: schishol@nortel.com,
htrevino@cisco.com
Pages: 35
Characters: 70878
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-netconf-notification-14.txt
URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5277.txt
This document defines mechanisms that provide an asynchronous message
notification delivery service for the Network Configuration protocol
(NETCONF). This is an optional capability built on top of the base
NETCONF definition. This document defines the capabilities and
operations necessary to support this service. [STANDARDS TRACK]
This document is a product of the Network Configuration Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Sat Jul 19 08:15:28 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41753A69B2;
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621FC3A69B2
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AWL=-0.301, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6,
STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id LmqDMC8dkOMQ for ;
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.versatel.net (relay.versatel.net [62.250.3.110])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 356013A6952
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 46279 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2008 15:16:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO BertLaptop) (87.215.199.34)
by relay.versatel.net with SMTP; 19 Jul 2008 15:16:01 -0000
Message-ID: <98533D69944F40A5A152FB57A4CDC62A@BertLaptop>
From: "Bert Wijnen \(IETF\)"
To:
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:15:36 +0200
Organization: Consultant
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545
Subject: [Netconf] Fw: RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Congrats to the WG and specifically to the authors/editors.
Also extra thanks to Mehmet who did the shepherding work while I
was absent on email last week.
Bert Wijnen
Document shepherd and co-chair for the Netconf WG.
----- Original Message -----
From:
To: ;
Cc: ;
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 1:40 AM
Subject: [Netconf] RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
>
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>
> RFC 5277
>
> Title: NETCONF Event Notifications
> Author: S. Chisholm, H. Trevino
> Status: Standards Track
> Date: July 2008
> Mailbox: schishol@nortel.com,
> htrevino@cisco.com
> Pages: 35
> Characters: 70878
> Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
>
> I-D Tag: draft-ietf-netconf-notification-14.txt
>
> URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5277.txt
>
> This document defines mechanisms that provide an asynchronous message
> notification delivery service for the Network Configuration protocol
> (NETCONF). This is an optional capability built on top of the base
> NETCONF definition. This document defines the capabilities and
> operations necessary to support this service. [STANDARDS TRACK]
>
> This document is a product of the Network Configuration Working Group of
> the IETF.
>
> This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
>
> STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
> protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and
> suggestions
> for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
> Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
> status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
>
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
>
> For searching the RFC series, see
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
>
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
>
>
> The RFC Editor Team
> USC/Information Sciences Institute
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
>
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Sat Jul 19 08:15:28 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41753A69B2;
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621FC3A69B2
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AWL=-0.301, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6,
STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id LmqDMC8dkOMQ for ;
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.versatel.net (relay.versatel.net [62.250.3.110])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 356013A6952
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 46279 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2008 15:16:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO BertLaptop) (87.215.199.34)
by relay.versatel.net with SMTP; 19 Jul 2008 15:16:01 -0000
Message-ID: <98533D69944F40A5A152FB57A4CDC62A@BertLaptop>
From: "Bert Wijnen \(IETF\)"
To:
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:15:36 +0200
Organization: Consultant
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545
Subject: [Netconf] Fw: RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Congrats to the WG and specifically to the authors/editors.
Also extra thanks to Mehmet who did the shepherding work while I
was absent on email last week.
Bert Wijnen
Document shepherd and co-chair for the Netconf WG.
----- Original Message -----
From:
To: ;
Cc: ;
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 1:40 AM
Subject: [Netconf] RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
>
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>
> RFC 5277
>
> Title: NETCONF Event Notifications
> Author: S. Chisholm, H. Trevino
> Status: Standards Track
> Date: July 2008
> Mailbox: schishol@nortel.com,
> htrevino@cisco.com
> Pages: 35
> Characters: 70878
> Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
>
> I-D Tag: draft-ietf-netconf-notification-14.txt
>
> URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5277.txt
>
> This document defines mechanisms that provide an asynchronous message
> notification delivery service for the Network Configuration protocol
> (NETCONF). This is an optional capability built on top of the base
> NETCONF definition. This document defines the capabilities and
> operations necessary to support this service. [STANDARDS TRACK]
>
> This document is a product of the Network Configuration Working Group of
> the IETF.
>
> This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
>
> STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
> protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and
> suggestions
> for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
> Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
> status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
>
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
>
> For searching the RFC series, see
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
>
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
>
>
> The RFC Editor Team
> USC/Information Sciences Institute
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
>
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Sun Jul 20 03:34:51 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A783A69D9;
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7463A69D9
for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.29
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.291,
BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id EAQCMtMVUsJF for ;
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com
(co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA6D3A69C3
for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,218,1215403200"; d="scan'208";a="136125883"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5])
by co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2008 06:35:26 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,218,1215403200"; d="scan'208";a="238817494"
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.14])
by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP;
20 Jul 2008 06:35:26 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:35:22 +0200
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <98533D69944F40A5A152FB57A4CDC62A@BertLaptop>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Fw: RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
Thread-Index: Acjpsl5J3CR9BtMVQ1+sDwa2in1EpQAoWOcg
References: <98533D69944F40A5A152FB57A4CDC62A@BertLaptop>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)"
To: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" ,
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Fw: RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
I am joining my congratulations to those from Bert and thanks to all
editors and contributors in the WG.
With this we have fully completed the first charter of NETCONF.
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bert Wijnen (IETF)
> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 6:16 PM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: [Netconf] Fw: RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
>
> Congrats to the WG and specifically to the authors/editors.
>
> Also extra thanks to Mehmet who did the shepherding work
> while I was absent on email last week.
>
> Bert Wijnen
> Document shepherd and co-chair for the Netconf WG.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
> To: ;
> Cc: ;
> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 1:40 AM
> Subject: [Netconf] RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
>
>
> >
> > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> >
> >
> > RFC 5277
> >
> > Title: NETCONF Event Notifications
> > Author: S. Chisholm, H. Trevino
> > Status: Standards Track
> > Date: July 2008
> > Mailbox: schishol@nortel.com,
> > htrevino@cisco.com
> > Pages: 35
> > Characters: 70878
> > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
> >
> > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-netconf-notification-14.txt
> >
> > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5277.txt
> >
> > This document defines mechanisms that provide an
> asynchronous message
> > notification delivery service for the Network Configuration protocol
> > (NETCONF). This is an optional capability built on top of the base
> > NETCONF definition. This document defines the capabilities and
> > operations necessary to support this service. [STANDARDS TRACK]
> >
> > This document is a product of the Network Configuration
> Working Group of
> > the IETF.
> >
> > This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
> >
> > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
> > protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and
> > suggestions
> > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of
> the Internet
> > Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization
> state and
> > status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
> >
> > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
> > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> > http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> >
> > For searching the RFC series, see
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
> > For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
> >
> > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> > author of the RFC in question, or to
> rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
> > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> > unlimited distribution.
> >
> >
> > The RFC Editor Team
> > USC/Information Sciences Institute
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Netconf mailing list
> > Netconf@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Sun Jul 20 03:34:51 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A783A69D9;
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7463A69D9
for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.29
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.291,
BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id EAQCMtMVUsJF for ;
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com
(co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA6D3A69C3
for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,218,1215403200"; d="scan'208";a="136125883"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5])
by co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2008 06:35:26 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,218,1215403200"; d="scan'208";a="238817494"
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.14])
by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP;
20 Jul 2008 06:35:26 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:35:22 +0200
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <98533D69944F40A5A152FB57A4CDC62A@BertLaptop>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Fw: RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
Thread-Index: Acjpsl5J3CR9BtMVQ1+sDwa2in1EpQAoWOcg
References: <98533D69944F40A5A152FB57A4CDC62A@BertLaptop>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)"
To: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" ,
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Fw: RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
I am joining my congratulations to those from Bert and thanks to all
editors and contributors in the WG.
With this we have fully completed the first charter of NETCONF.
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bert Wijnen (IETF)
> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 6:16 PM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: [Netconf] Fw: RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
>
> Congrats to the WG and specifically to the authors/editors.
>
> Also extra thanks to Mehmet who did the shepherding work
> while I was absent on email last week.
>
> Bert Wijnen
> Document shepherd and co-chair for the Netconf WG.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
> To: ;
> Cc: ;
> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 1:40 AM
> Subject: [Netconf] RFC 5277 on NETCONF Event Notifications
>
>
> >
> > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> >
> >
> > RFC 5277
> >
> > Title: NETCONF Event Notifications
> > Author: S. Chisholm, H. Trevino
> > Status: Standards Track
> > Date: July 2008
> > Mailbox: schishol@nortel.com,
> > htrevino@cisco.com
> > Pages: 35
> > Characters: 70878
> > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
> >
> > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-netconf-notification-14.txt
> >
> > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5277.txt
> >
> > This document defines mechanisms that provide an
> asynchronous message
> > notification delivery service for the Network Configuration protocol
> > (NETCONF). This is an optional capability built on top of the base
> > NETCONF definition. This document defines the capabilities and
> > operations necessary to support this service. [STANDARDS TRACK]
> >
> > This document is a product of the Network Configuration
> Working Group of
> > the IETF.
> >
> > This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
> >
> > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
> > protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and
> > suggestions
> > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of
> the Internet
> > Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization
> state and
> > status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
> >
> > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
> > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> > http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> >
> > For searching the RFC series, see
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
> > For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
> >
> > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> > author of the RFC in question, or to
> rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
> > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> > unlimited distribution.
> >
> >
> > The RFC Editor Team
> > USC/Information Sciences Institute
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Netconf mailing list
> > Netconf@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Mon Jul 21 01:11:12 2008
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946363A6804;
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE403A6804
for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.500,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id bpx-HE26r8qj for ;
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net
[217.115.75.233])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DF93A6774
for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55])
by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
m6L8Bjj0029083
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:11:45 +0200
Received: from demuexc023.nsn-intra.net (webmail.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.36])
by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP
id m6L8Bjqh030759; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:11:45 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC005.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.103]) by
demuexc023.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:11:46 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:11:45 +0200
Message-ID:
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-02.txt
Thread-Index: AcjrCWrf22XotsfZTqeCi4yQt6ScVg==
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Muenich)"
To: "Mark Scott" ,
"Sharon Chisholm"