From nobody Tue Jan 2 11:28:39 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F231200C1; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:28:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XqwGR4kv_QcS; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x235.google.com (mail-ot0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C74F12D7FB; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x235.google.com with SMTP id q39so37899493otb.8; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 11:28:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vOAXuQbx/8myZlfoF/PIeuu8/v9s0XnibRMUi8uE7Ac=; b=kHiK6TJuUikgcmkj2DnH7nxEITa2sqiYyTsA4dN5CFQf6AoGYHtmd8SHP7IVGCki6s wOkpWmURW4ClKfHmuK5DMKVcHKfIldfiR39ey0ns3BqzEYFgu7qv6ZVOuaTNu548vOVx xoh6dVkzT6qGqqe87RFfFJnoXKrskoNpI7Zxi+JFnerQkiux/1wi2fO9PRYsl8bByMh2 8jNuDcDiWpM7lzprueJB11D4r41waBqEQVffPkux9zmVi6vapBS9SEVTI6ijQ0vC+cjX hCVQonPm6wz5wCkOZiiX52ejTZe+1PE82tFqEuprPGGwXYkp4s6pxGNKTXkLvEB9L7ES FxNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vOAXuQbx/8myZlfoF/PIeuu8/v9s0XnibRMUi8uE7Ac=; b=StBBGo715MCaN+JTR5l3VLKgWV6qakjSYSFC9MKKgfCg8JC6OVPB1IJciSydJoUHRc Q7jHX4mGL4L6Uf6ud52wW8vpLNNJHahHxTidXAW5/hkGVb2YEw9ArTQX7+/3QOSDG4Sh 0k8PscTrIAl4ms+/PtH3jFZ191j9sBijUot1uMccUBnqjjt2bJrzn8R+xmuqGGCznZkD mu+/ixUSY4v8S3Eh+H8O/o+/+TGouKFdY35Ghz99GP6NzAjH/qZDmzWxPgl1x/8TJqqY l+KH3qWyLfhba8TT9PlNXCRq1YDXT+uIx/7kK3BnBoMogoi2GD0rOHt0i9xH7cufczJg B9ew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJTKh2wTOF3spTNrkYq5KOq1c2dkNEbJqpkV2VopWQhQ+v9gab/ NVb1rakMXrzbZ2lYMPZNThspHCDTenefi9p90ww=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoslAa4+mcIxMqyfet3i/xHfMZBZtx80u3NbFhZTXZNAPaeTRbLWySAfCE+fZmYZOkDJ4UEgbe6qRcqc1a2n9bo=
X-Received: by 10.157.47.33 with SMTP id h30mr10376114otb.362.1514921314487; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 11:28:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.4.54 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:28:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <004801d37a3d$b7f72ee0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <151188671748.12571.6956805096015137683.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <004801d37a3d$b7f72ee0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: Alia Atlas
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:28:33 -0500
Message-ID:
Subject: Re: Last Call: (A YANG Data Model for Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)) to Proposed Standard
To: "t.petch"
Cc: rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org, "rtgwg@ietf.org"
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c04f8bed016550561d01a17"
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 19:28:38 -0000
--94eb2c04f8bed016550561d01a17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi Tom,
The announcement calls them out to see if they are acceptable normative
references (and is now
nicely automatic after too many being missed).
That said - for those that have been updated, the draft should be updated
as well.
Thanks for noticing!
Alia
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:18 AM, t.petch wrote:
> I note that this has several downref listed in the announcement. Two
> these have been superseded (the I-D itself is out-of-date with regard to
> this as well).
>
> Is the announcement still valid?
>
> Just asking.
>
> Tom Petch
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "The IESG"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 4:31 PM
>
>
> > The IESG has received a request from the Routing Area Working Group WG
> > (rtgwg) to consider the following document: - 'A YANG Data Model for
> Virtual
> > Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)'
> > as Proposed Standard
> >
> > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final
> > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-12-12. Exceptionally, comments may
> be
> > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of
> > the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> >
> > This document describes a data model for Virtual Router Redundancy
> > Protocol (VRRP). Both version 2 and version 3 of VRRP are covered.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The file can be obtained via
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
> >
> > IESG discussion can be tracked via
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/ballot/
> >
> >
> > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> >
> >
> > The document contains these normative downward references.
> > See RFC 3967 for additional information:
> > draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis: A YANG Data Model for IP
> Management (None - IETF stream)
> > draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis: A YANG Data Model for Interface
> Management (None - IETF stream)
> > draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores: Network Management Datastore
> Architecture (None - IETF stream)
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtgwg mailing list
> > rtgwg@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
--94eb2c04f8bed016550561d01a17
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Tom,
The announcement calls them out=
to see if they are acceptable normative references (and is now
n=
icely automatic after too many being missed).
That=
said - for those that have been updated, the draft should be updated as we=
ll.=C2=A0=C2=A0
I note that this has several down=
ref listed in the announcement.=C2=A0 Two
these have been superseded (the I-D itself is out-of-date with regard to
this as well).
Is the announcement still valid?
Just asking.
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "The IESG" <i=
esg-secretary@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 4:31 PM
> The IESG has received a request from the Routing Area Working Group WG=
> (rtgwg) to consider the following document: - 'A YANG Data Model f=
or
Virtual
> Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)'
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0<draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07.txt> as Proposed=
Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits<=
br>
final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 20=
17-12-12. Exceptionally, comments may
be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In=
either case, please retain the
beginning of
> the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 This document describes a data model for Virtual Router R=
edundancy
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Protocol (VRRP).=C2=A0 Both version 2 and version 3 of VR=
RP are covered.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/d=
oc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org=
/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
> The document contains these normative downward references.
> See RFC 3967 for additional information:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis: A YANG Data=
Model for IP
Management (None - IETF stream)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis: A YANG Data=
Model for Interface
Management (None - IETF stream)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores: Network =
Management Datastore
Architecture (None - IETF stream)
>
>
>
--94eb2c04f8bed016550561d01a17--
From nobody Tue Jan 2 15:31:17 2018
Return-Path: <7riw77@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6AF12D850 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:31:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-RwL0D5D6pR for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645681200F3 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:31:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 87so384583ior.5; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:31:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=J26P6g/UknqkUMJonDNtp8dKtLC7F/UonFjDw5EEUT0=; b=RIOyCOlzOzNH13p9EJ4mluK+2ZXK/9IgmyuxtlAUXh6DAAVG/IFH3pdmHvd9Xte6LS wZvNleVOzaaGpe/Ux1c3oQvrK2dgV/9RJFLUC13B1B4AKgURfa83SjrNjFLU3/EwwBeP 62I6IiVQGD1xdeXYgRthSIcizmDKBHAGFJcnwYVVKfWVMy100FLnb9JjYqMAcR7CKVdT jYA/lbAbyuSLaJeLYci9z2qkiOjROBVnDJW/UdqMmfgEsBi0zeNk6bY1zkKaEjIMBvt1 6uqQWjq7P+DoM4JdhjTl/wB3/mMNW5nrGqhvNlYET3POYFAzpOWxHkxTPmrxuprT327s y9Nw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=J26P6g/UknqkUMJonDNtp8dKtLC7F/UonFjDw5EEUT0=; b=cOoiRpHR9CqtMLSqHPDOnNxXhoO9/NDV8AgHECOafRSnmSOiB7IE1eT4q5/1KCwNd2 j3ARzaSxRnJliFwHNktXbQCu5W9uy/QNwrPB6OwOW5UD0u58yHoB1rqvJj4vwL/1NWUX T6vpjlxkl0GJrX2meLMHd0R71Yd1lBoalL5JS9UkYy/LuHxDsvuA2989X6VAPh/sq0rR zImhijD0MRNzLLr7Jndx2R6isGvn27trXguw8w69oMOa8fpVF/1D3Knhz1fheg2ZBpU7 0crXTJIA50IvfHSqBKnKZOMBKDT2wlY9/U0cgbq35gWRjI+1hmKdKfcbqkRuRjoxYbMW 5c8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKIr3pgSmuqymdu4i7BIn61snYOpOWADEYeqYmSlA8cw/vJJsKv mBDidikhwZkYp6QED3vMVDfiJQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou0KP3mwPedvWu9zg0WSv6FuHT0O4HowWD1LdGKodKvcZszcaBHJhSvfGSIVrqODAHTFqLelA==
X-Received: by 10.107.47.231 with SMTP id v100mr22460828iov.171.1514935871503; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:31:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Russ (108-78-210-25.lightspeed.chrlnc.sbcglobal.net. [108.78.210.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n76sm18962366ioi.60.2018.01.02.15.31.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:31:11 -0800 (PST)
From: <7riw77@gmail.com>
To: ,
References: <151493571194.30882.18203313153785622115.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151493571194.30882.18203313153785622115.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-white-openfabric-05.txt
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 18:31:00 -0500
Message-ID: <0c2801d38421$c46b2620$4d417260$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQE1rhMjDIv4Ez/9KpY4eAiQ22KDbqSc5yqw
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:31:16 -0000
Just minor changes in this version to match the currently-in-progress =
implementation.
=F0=9F=98=8A /r
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 6:29 PM
> To: Shawn Zandi ; Russ White
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-white-openfabric-05.txt
>=20
>=20
> A new version of I-D, draft-white-openfabric-05.txt has been =
successfully
> submitted by Russ White and posted to the IETF repository.
>=20
> Name: draft-white-openfabric
> Revision: 05
> Title: IS-IS Support for Openfabric
> Document date: 2018-01-02
> Group: Individual Submission
> Pages: 18
> URL: =
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-white-openfabric-05.txt
> Status: =
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-openfabric/
> Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-white-openfabric-05
> Htmlized: =
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-white-openfabric-05
> Diff: =
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-white-openfabric-05
>=20
> Abstract:
> Spine and leaf topologies are widely used in hyperscale and cloud
> scale networks. In most of these networks, configuration is
> automated, but difficult, and topology information is extracted
> through broad based connections. Policy is often integrated into =
the
> control plane, as well, making configuration, management, and
> troubleshooting difficult. Openfabric is an adaptation of an
> existing, widely deployed link state protocol, Intermediate System =
to
> Intermediate System (IS-IS) that is designed to:
>=20
> o Provide a full view of the topology from a single point in the
> network to simplify operations
>=20
> o Minimize configuration of each Intermediate System (IS) (also
> called a router or switch) in the network
>=20
> o Optimize the operation of IS-IS within a spine and leaf fabric =
to
> enable scaling
>=20
> This document begins with an overview of openfabric, including a
> description of what may be removed from IS-IS to enable scaling. =
The
> document then describes an optimized adjacency formation process; =
an
> optimized flooding scheme; some thoughts on the operation of
> openfabric, metrics, and aggregation; and finally a description of
> the changes to the IS-IS protocol required for openfabric.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of =
submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>=20
> The IETF Secretariat
From nobody Fri Jan 5 19:24:42 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A06712785F; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 19:24:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IPvWOhjlVIfg; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 19:24:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22a.google.com (mail-ot0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC83312420B; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 19:24:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id h2so5455138oti.5; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 19:24:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZSc08mlMja7KUjNucODdRWuuFebXi8jzmldG5vnD0eU=; b=oW15fyaJejR4TGAnEW+neZb7Xcgx7Niu1+nt/mdzUmGUfloESSEnzArx5/uPmIBWNP sVv4Saqzh9lNJ82nBx486SB5n+zbN9oginxNXjqEhWsBrr7DJu1vz+rniUnx48P+cchW UxJrCslZMSoLf062T/+FVltftHk32lgt6A55aoxDugZRFTTiUFMbiWDpZeBocI6ZZfGv 6uU1COdSWvzwtVlb8PoW+1xf5SHKZjwRyt+j7DWBHVNlb1AONHIh9UtkVpRQXyqHwNgJ PPAPzHuwCkg3l22bBtFPUseba99Idzzkf0QL4IMqzSEIKjkZsdOiOzME/8v494f8Sdbh 1zrw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZSc08mlMja7KUjNucODdRWuuFebXi8jzmldG5vnD0eU=; b=q8P4B9pc6EIuTxx8euZudt0mzc5lWXtucGFA5Qyn/KOHjBsVoxsPNXafHahHL2Zlbt YBl258yJ019QlrWnSHXKWpV8w2B+RR7JQeyMYMKTwBgV7nc0bbhAIGCsaJxNm7VUAX7R loWDkt/3SQPWIVEdWkR1Pb8IBS9QBUHY99XIMlIqf8Cs+2Q7QoDq9oTTBhDK7wy490/E nhBZGXKJOd6Kq8QBk4ZaDk44yA5FIIlu/0oYlm1JP/RzHar5aBNWagDBTrB0anexzesY g6P56vNWUJNf/KoCYWBeKiqIq2N3sgntrH4O4cXeFUjfzkTVgR9mdfIx/Kz1S6f+h5OG HmcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdFfHArxVjh0x5FrMerU/SF9pP01E3QMa7vxFFP0UBvvZzQRP54 S3AJwlfHe34/Rd5qFpGTkCl153YwvoPIBfDEfrY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosVyhhBXULv8ZniCVrUG9xmczCcPXG3T9OwrNX6h7nnnbdOhXQN+/mfY1m9KebYUCWq6e4IvCor97siYtd8Z/E=
X-Received: by 10.157.89.137 with SMTP id u9mr2837566oth.164.1515209077635; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 19:24:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 19:24:37 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana
X-Mailer: Airmail (467)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 19:24:37 -0800
Message-ID:
Subject: Fwd: [Rift] kicking off the charter discussion
To: routing-discussion@ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f40304353f64d53da00562131a94"
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 03:24:41 -0000
--f40304353f64d53da00562131a94
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
FYI..
If you are interested in this topic, please make comments and send feedback
on the rift@ietf.org list.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On January 5, 2018 at 3:03:25 AM, Alia Atlas (akatlas@gmail.com) wrote:
Tony, Jeffrey Zhang, I, and others have been discussing possible RIFT WG
charters with Alvaro. Here is what we have so far. Comments and
improvements would be most welcome.
================
Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT)
Clos and Fat-Tree topologies have gained prominence in data center networks
as a result of a trend towards centralized data center network
architectures that may deliver computation and storage services.
The Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT) protocol addresses the demands of routing
in Clos and Fat-Tree networks via a mixture of both link-state and
distance-vector techniques colloquially described as 'link-state towards
the spine and distance vector towards the leafs'. RIFT uses this hybrid
approach to focus on networks with regular topologies with a high degree of
connectivity, a defined directionality, and large scale.
The RIFT Working Group will work on a standards track specification of a
specialized, dynamic routing protocol for Clos and fat-tree network
topologies. The protocol will:
- deal with automatic construction of fat-tree topologies based on
detection of links,
- minimize the amount of routing state held at each topology level,
- automatically prune topology distribution exchanges to a
sufficient subset of links,
- support automatic disaggregation of prefixes on link and node failures to
prevent black-holing and suboptimal routing,
- allow traffic steering and re-routing policies,
- and provide mechanisms to synchronize a limited key-value data-store
that can be used after protocol convergence.
It is important that nodes participating in the protocol should need only
very light configuration and should be able to join a network as leaf nodes
simply by connecting to the network using default configuration.
The protocol must support IPv6 and should also support IPv4.
The Working Group may establish additional requirements to constrain and
inform their work.
The RIFT Working Group is chartered for the following list of items:
- A Standards Track specification based on draft-przygienda-rift. The
document will include:
- an Implementation Status section as described in RFC 7942
- an Operational Considerations section to explain how the protocol is
configured, deployed, and diagnosed
- Security and Privacy Considerations, although this material may refer
to a separate Threat Analysis document (q.v.).
- A YANG module focused on configuration of protocol instances
- An Applicability Statement that describes how to deploy and configure
the protocol in networks with different topologies
- A Security Threat Analysis document that describes the attack vectors
and mitigations that shall be sent for publication at the same time as the
protocol specification.
Milestones
Feb 2018 Adopt a protocol specification document
Feb 2019 Submit protocol specification to IESG for publication
Feb 2019 Submit Threat Analysis to IESG for publication
Apr 2019 Submit YANG module to IESG for publication
Apr 2019 Submit Applicability Statement to IESG for publication
============
Thanks,
Alia
_______________________________________________
Rift mailing list
Rift@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
--f40304353f64d53da00562131a94
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=
FYI..
If you are interested in this topic, please make comments and se=
nd feedback on the rift@ietf.org=C2=A0=
list.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On January 5, 2018 at 3:03:25 AM, Alia Atlas (akatlas@gmail.com) wrote:
Tony, Jeffrey Zhang, I, and others have been
discussing possible RIFT WG charters with Alvaro.=C2=A0 Here is
what we have so far.=C2=A0 Comments and improvements would be most
welcome.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT)
Clos and Fat-Tree topologies have gained prominence in data center
networks as a result of a trend towards centralized data center
network architectures that may deliver computation and storage
services.
=C2=A0
The Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT) protocol addresses the demands of
routing in Clos and Fat-Tree networks via a mixture of both
link-state and distance-vector techniques colloquially described as
'link-state towards the spine and distance vector towards the
leafs'.=C2=A0 RIFT uses this hybrid approach to focus on networks
with regular topologies with a high degree of connectivity, a
defined directionality, and large scale.
The RIFT Working Group will work on a standards track specification
of a specialized, dynamic routing protocol for Clos and fat-tree
network topologies. The protocol will:
- deal with automatic construction of fat-tree topologies based on
detection of links,
- minimize the amount of routing state held at each topology
level,
- automatically prune topology distribution exchanges to a
sufficient=C2=A0subset of links,
- support automatic disaggregation of prefixes on link and node
failures to prevent black-holing and suboptimal routing,
- allow traffic steering and re-routing policies,
- and provide mechanisms to synchronize a limited key-value
data-store that=C2=A0can be used after protocol convergence.
It is important that nodes participating in the protocol should
need only very light configuration and should be able to join a
network as leaf nodes simply by connecting to the network using
default configuration.
The protocol must support IPv6 and should also support IPv4.
The Working Group may establish additional requirements to
constrain and inform their work.
The RIFT Working Group is chartered for the following list of
items:
- A Standards Track specification based on draft-przygienda-rift.
The document will include:
=C2=A0 - an Implementation Status section as described in RFC
7942
=C2=A0 - an Operational Considerations section to explain how the
protocol is configured, deployed, and diagnosed
=C2=A0 - Security and Privacy Considerations, although this
material may refer to a separate Threat Analysis document
(q.v.).
=C2=A0 - A YANG module focused on configuration of protocol
instances
=C2=A0 - An Applicability Statement that describes how to deploy
and configure the protocol in networks with different
topologies
=C2=A0 - A Security Threat Analysis document that describes the
attack vectors and mitigations that shall be sent for publication
at the same time as the protocol specification.
Milestones
=C2=A0 Feb 2018 Adopt a protocol specification document
=C2=A0 Feb 2019 Submit protocol specification to IESG for
publication
=C2=A0 Feb 2019 Submit Threat Analysis to IESG for
publication
=C2=A0 Apr 2019 Submit YANG module to IESG for publication
=C2=A0 Apr 2019 Submit Applicability Statement to IESG for
publication
--f40304353f64d53da00562131a94--
From nobody Sat Jan 6 11:48:48 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BC8128959; Sat, 6 Jan 2018 11:48:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H1eIKA46z_-Z; Sat, 6 Jan 2018 11:48:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A666D124205; Sat, 6 Jan 2018 11:48:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w06JmYfb006343; Sat, 6 Jan 2018 19:48:34 GMT
Received: from 950129200 ([193.56.243.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w06JmWfF006330 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Jan 2018 19:48:33 GMT
Reply-To:
From: "Adrian Farrel"
To: "'Alvaro Retana'"
Cc: ,
References:
In-Reply-To:
Subject: RE: [Rift] kicking off the charter discussion
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 19:48:34 -0000
Message-ID: <002601d38727$57b4b010$071e1030$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0027_01D38727.57C244A0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQMzL2uhu7Viq2qc1OoXva7zQ+HgrqCn7hkQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.2.0.1013-23578.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--25.718-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--25.718-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 8HTFlOrbAtG6dV6AbIg41p1U1lojafr/g3XZcphu4kupxIL5viAGNAFx JQwzL/yF2YJ36PQpkbzbAqeSI3xDnShAwBpwK3XPW7gz/Gbgpl4K3iJpXUOQQxW+93iqRvX7V2O iGxTSnduuqVF0LsZuzRHyJWk7t0ytOaS9U7Z42f57sw7yO+Y9LNZKsq3DGpalvQIe0iBJ63EnP8 WWLvfAyFVuZQG2jzkwDMkIXnVvXPuziThmwPb+1TCj6xe3SuezB4Id7CiQcz/AzMkrlTL3Pp3xj riW4ma/m2CJNcBHUtXn1xYiO/F4jXjxgHkp9duC7T+j7/gPsPMS12tj9Zvd82so23uKlCJjfiJg EbG3V+QFiULpPd2fD+YshxIte+eXkdwNWPvebh2628cXbnOhT0yWLwjUVKFu+VFLFq8A8jW2fEb PR0rynzFn1ScbWur/QrbWJq0bZcjaqMoBhXwtRiBg3q+CymTwWEPEl3ozFuNXJyCkmYopd/ENJs pW4K4YPVLKIEs0GLW0F0wsmVGCn+RSSJk4GjSywkMSqacJzSum17CUF0OKCb/FQgGhXj1Wc66U8 x0uyZmQtPeY3/HeX0zs6tP/J/n0mv/lCFMzyYLQfDWILG9BqTTbofuc5kuvf7FDYGpyXq3QarbX +8U9GYIrAaGdidrJqSfQEB91VdVcNOa3zFU5XzGfHCHX/mgUbv16+gil4jdMOjKUxCZwr3mGgNm gsYErgHo2pwB65bSnRkwgj4khmPJn3YGdiqTm/O70vD0Lt8ATbU1KYGoQp3XwPGvwnyr47/+9sw uISRVYVA2Tj4cKiIcypU5vI8wyw1hXve9gEVCeAiCmPx4NwGmRqNBHmBve1B0Hk1Q1KyJck9lvx NcntYEliUr8JkQ/SrGvbSw43pZbkqQpDu0tbAW8XWTVw2sCZm9x7imJdKxYqTIUvCfO1A==
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 19:48:41 -0000
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01D38727.57C244A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey Alvaro,
=20
I looked for the sign-up page for rift@ietf.org at =
https://datatracker.ietf.org/list/wg/ and =
https://www.ietf.org/list/nonwg.html but nothing shows up.
Maybe, I thought, there is a WG page at =
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rift where the draft charter shows up =
and the details of the mailing list can be found, but no.
=20
Now, of course, I can work it out from the normal format (an there it is =
in the signature of Alia's email autogenerated by the list.
=20
So, for those who wondered, join the list at =
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
=20
But perhaps an AD could fix up the other stuff?
=20
Cheers,
Adrian
--
Support an author and your imagination
Tales from the Wood - Eighteen new fairy tales
More Tales from the Wood - Eighteen MORE new fairy tales
Tales from Beyond the Wood - A bumper collection of twenty-two new tales
https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Wood-Adrian-Farrel/dp/1786100924
Or buy from me direct.
=20
=20
=20
From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana
Sent: 06 January 2018 03:25
To: routing-discussion@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Fwd: [Rift] kicking off the charter discussion
=20
FYI..
=20
If you are interested in this topic, please make comments and send =
feedback on the rift@ietf.org list.
=20
Thanks!
=20
Alvaro.
=20
On January 5, 2018 at 3:03:25 AM, Alia Atlas (akatlas@gmail.com) wrote:
Tony, Jeffrey Zhang, I, and others have been discussing possible RIFT WG =
charters with Alvaro. Here is what we have so far. Comments and =
improvements would be most welcome.=20
=20
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT)
Clos and Fat-Tree topologies have gained prominence in data center =
networks as a result of a trend towards centralized data center network =
architectures that may deliver computation and storage services.
=20
The Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT) protocol addresses the demands of =
routing in Clos and Fat-Tree networks via a mixture of both link-state =
and distance-vector techniques colloquially described as 'link-state =
towards the spine and distance vector towards the leafs'. RIFT uses =
this hybrid approach to focus on networks with regular topologies with a =
high degree of connectivity, a defined directionality, and large scale.
The RIFT Working Group will work on a standards track specification of a =
specialized, dynamic routing protocol for Clos and fat-tree network =
topologies. The protocol will:
- deal with automatic construction of fat-tree topologies based on =
detection of links,
- minimize the amount of routing state held at each topology level,
- automatically prune topology distribution exchanges to a sufficient =
subset of links,
- support automatic disaggregation of prefixes on link and node failures =
to prevent black-holing and suboptimal routing,
- allow traffic steering and re-routing policies,
- and provide mechanisms to synchronize a limited key-value data-store =
that can be used after protocol convergence.
It is important that nodes participating in the protocol should need =
only very light configuration and should be able to join a network as =
leaf nodes simply by connecting to the network using default =
configuration.
The protocol must support IPv6 and should also support IPv4.
The Working Group may establish additional requirements to constrain and =
inform their work.
The RIFT Working Group is chartered for the following list of items:
- A Standards Track specification based on draft-przygienda-rift. The =
document will include:
- an Implementation Status section as described in RFC 7942
- an Operational Considerations section to explain how the protocol is =
configured, deployed, and diagnosed
- Security and Privacy Considerations, although this material may =
refer to a separate Threat Analysis document (q.v.).
- A YANG module focused on configuration of protocol instances
- An Applicability Statement that describes how to deploy and =
configure the protocol in networks with different topologies
- A Security Threat Analysis document that describes the attack =
vectors and mitigations that shall be sent for publication at the same =
time as the protocol specification.
Milestones
Feb 2018 Adopt a protocol specification document
Feb 2019 Submit protocol specification to IESG for publication
Feb 2019 Submit Threat Analysis to IESG for publication
Apr 2019 Submit YANG module to IESG for publication
Apr 2019 Submit Applicability Statement to IESG for publication=20
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Thanks,
Alia
_______________________________________________=20
Rift mailing list=20
Rift@ietf.org=20
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift=20
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01D38727.57C244A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey =
Alvaro,
I looked for the sign-up page =
for rift@ietf.org at https://datatracker.ietf.org/list/wg/ and =
https://www.ietf.org/list/nonwg.html but nothing shows =
up.
Maybe, I thought, there is a =
WG page at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rift where the draft charter =
shows up and the details of the mailing list can be found, but =
no.
Now, of course, I can work it =
out from the normal format (an there it is in the signature of Alia's =
email autogenerated by the list.
So, for those who wondered, =
join the list at =
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
But perhaps an AD could fix up =
the other stuff?
Cheers,
Adrian
--
Support an author and your =
imagination
Tales from the Wood - Eighteen =
new fairy tales
More Tales from the Wood - =
Eighteen MORE new fairy tales
Tales =
from Beyond the Wood - A bumper collection of twenty-two new =
tales
From: rtgwg =
[mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro =
Retana Sent: 06 January 2018 03:25 To: =
routing-discussion@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: Fwd: =
[Rift] kicking off the charter =
discussion
FYI..
If you are interested in this topic, =
please make comments and send feedback on the rift@ietf.org list.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On =
January 5, 2018 at 3:03:25 AM, Alia Atlas (akatlas@gmail.com) =
wrote:
Tony, Jeffrey Zhang, I, and others have =
been discussing possible RIFT WG charters with Alvaro. Here is =
what we have so far. Comments and improvements would be most =
welcome.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT)
Clos =
and Fat-Tree topologies have gained prominence in data center networks =
as a result of a trend towards centralized data center network =
architectures that may deliver computation and storage =
services.
The Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT) protocol =
addresses the demands of routing in Clos and Fat-Tree networks via a =
mixture of both link-state and distance-vector techniques colloquially =
described as 'link-state towards the spine and distance vector towards =
the leafs'. RIFT uses this hybrid approach to focus on networks =
with regular topologies with a high degree of connectivity, a defined =
directionality, and large scale.
The RIFT Working Group will work =
on a standards track specification of a specialized, dynamic routing =
protocol for Clos and fat-tree network topologies. The protocol =
will:
- deal with automatic construction of fat-tree topologies =
based on detection of links, - minimize the amount of routing state =
held at each topology level, - automatically prune topology =
distribution exchanges to a sufficient subset of links, - =
support automatic disaggregation of prefixes on link and node failures =
to prevent black-holing and suboptimal routing, - allow traffic =
steering and re-routing policies, - and provide mechanisms to =
synchronize a limited key-value data-store that can be used after =
protocol convergence.
It is important that nodes participating in =
the protocol should need only very light configuration and should be =
able to join a network as leaf nodes simply by connecting to the network =
using default configuration.
The protocol must support IPv6 and =
should also support IPv4.
The Working Group may establish =
additional requirements to constrain and inform their work.
The =
RIFT Working Group is chartered for the following list of =
items:
- A Standards Track specification based on =
draft-przygienda-rift. The document will include:
- an =
Implementation Status section as described in RFC 7942 - an =
Operational Considerations section to explain how the protocol is =
configured, deployed, and diagnosed - Security and Privacy =
Considerations, although this material may refer to a separate Threat =
Analysis document (q.v.). - A YANG module focused on =
configuration of protocol instances - An Applicability =
Statement that describes how to deploy and configure the protocol in =
networks with different topologies - A Security Threat =
Analysis document that describes the attack vectors and mitigations that =
shall be sent for publication at the same time as the protocol =
specification.
Milestones
Feb 2018 Adopt a protocol =
specification document Feb 2019 Submit protocol specification =
to IESG for publication Feb 2019 Submit Threat Analysis to =
IESG for publication Apr 2019 Submit YANG module to IESG for =
publication Apr 2019 Submit Applicability Statement to IESG =
for publication
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01D38727.57C244A0--
From nobody Sat Jan 6 16:39:27 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD44012421A; Sat, 6 Jan 2018 16:39:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.738
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sviqvsAk8X-r; Sat, 6 Jan 2018 16:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x243.google.com (mail-oi0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141F41242F7; Sat, 6 Jan 2018 16:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x243.google.com with SMTP id g6so5350403oib.11; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 16:39:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JRKfuQfr5mLxniNAyMYSSv0R7u2UkYepC4Pd1C+0/UI=; b=Z0vH19V8kkmJ5bVS34G6DGnreNEi87qFBFAVXw11ZCrovyRPylac5HbKQAGm7uJJ9L Ru3N1WLP1J1cNgGmIcgyndhNq/l8w2oTac/TOtO4AwwqhC1eM3tXBfUXLhg/L6EY6hUe cjXI6CF+ozhtKlwFbTM7KGbGpeW20ufFMaBjyu53lQ9SKHTvFIujz9x/cJJUK7G6tSk3 U8CM6DS96uF9E2CmID2ES8m+zSztZxpndU0V86G8gC+twyGEnsGDThBFpi/HHykq5h+t XyWxssgsnC/eoAi0aMvBZwbyha1en5HwCaotdJWz8JtMeZ6azIErFQ7fO8vJgTRv5MVJ 68OQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JRKfuQfr5mLxniNAyMYSSv0R7u2UkYepC4Pd1C+0/UI=; b=mCmwkSmQlU212Rh1FE4iRzu93/CfAxX/RLEAlVRge1GP0Pk2QJPz8OyOxYpdyaMKGp LJpC3f+k8AdNtHB4rqIxNNGldHiCo5B7BIHanhCUpH2dtKYN8rzYQG8vDJxys+CHER7Q jwm2XD+d8cH1qBIKNUYcb3zeE38KnKScug7rMaUkSXhOf0H8oFhsCLmQ/zL1XMqec3lA Pn6lKxaN/Sf9cS8u9kTsP7GC0ElHC/jmlPG7s+n8lTrjBazQ9dwa8Me6ZQ45QSjQsoQM rne8X77/FYe9YFVd7Z0IE+Gfo5qyiottKATKaCoGxxrs7IzQkZopp/pGsPME0Bh4wUsA nX2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKD3W66xRcFy1h5cELs1AKK87eGgNlYhNEl+z0wJzWQohh9eYCF gvdQ2yHBdRkvHIfkL5ZdNaLtfmtdqe6Q9d6a9FA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosvXIjzJsSMnJcnDi126dbFVwNqfHJbnRuYrm2IaQ47lDwRoXNBcyE2v96cZ1rRV+pYqDCAGkH6Bgxua4p9WN0=
X-Received: by 10.202.79.129 with SMTP id d123mr4015287oib.308.1515285558460; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 16:39:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 6 Jan 2018 16:39:18 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana
In-Reply-To: <002601d38727$57b4b010$071e1030$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <002601d38727$57b4b010$071e1030$@olddog.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Airmail (467)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 16:39:18 -0800
Message-ID:
Subject: RE: [Rift] kicking off the charter discussion
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org, routing-discussion@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d76fa720a4b056224e9a0"
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2018 00:39:21 -0000
--001a113d76fa720a4b056224e9a0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Adrian:
Hi!
Yes. I should have included a link.
I don=E2=80=99t know why the list doesn=E2=80=99t show up in the IETF Non-W=
G Mailing Lists
page =E2=80=94 I=E2=80=99ll have the list manager fix that. I haven=E2=80=
=99t set up the WG-to-be
page yet =E2=80=94 waiting for more discussion.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On January 7, 2018 at 3:48:35 AM, Adrian Farrel (adrian@olddog.co.uk) wrote=
:
I looked for the sign-up page for rift@ietf.org at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/list/wg/ and
https://www.ietf.org/list/nonwg.html but nothing shows up.
Maybe, I thought, there is a WG page at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rif=
t
where the draft charter shows up and the details of the mailing list can
be found, but no.
Now, of course, I can work it out from the normal format (an there it is in
the signature of Alia's email autogenerated by the list.
So, for those who wondered, join the list at
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
But perhaps an AD could fix up the other stuff?
--001a113d76fa720a4b056224e9a0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=
Adrian:
Hi!
Ye=
s.=C2=A0 I should have included a link.
I don=E2=80=99t know why the list doesn=E2=80=99t show u=
p in the IETF Non-WG Mailing Lists page =E2=80=94 I=E2=80=99ll have the lis=
t manager fix that.=C2=A0 I haven=E2=80=99t set up the WG-to-be page yet =
=E2=80=94 waiting for more discussion.
Maybe, I thought, there is a WG page at=C2=A0http=
s://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rift=
=C2=A0where the draft charter shows up and the details of the mailin=
g list can be found, but no.
=C2=A0
Now, of course, I can work it out from the normal format (an there=
it is in the signature of Alia's email autogenerated by the list.
--001a113d76fa720a4b056224e9a0--
From nobody Mon Jan 8 12:14:03 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3C71241F5; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:14:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
To:
Cc: akatlas@gmail.com, chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com, rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: rtgwg - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 101
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151544244146.11337.16083248198353118541.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 12:14:01 -0800
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 20:14:01 -0000
A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Chris Bowers, a Chair of the rtgwg working group.
---------------------------------------------------------
Working Group Name: Routing Area Working Group
Area Name: Routing Area
Session Requester: Chris Bowers
Number of Sessions: 2
Length of Session(s): 2.5 Hours, 2 Hours
Number of Attendees: 125
Conflicts to Avoid:
First Priority: isis mpls ospf idr spring
Second Priority: bfd v6ops pce bier teas netmod babel
Third Priority: detnet panrg pim netconf
People who must be present:
Alia Atlas
Jeff Tantsura
Chris Bowers
Resources Requested:
Special Requests:
Please avoid Routing In Fat Trees (rift) and Link State Vector Routing (lsvr) as first priority conflicts if they meet in London. They are in the process of being chartered.
---------------------------------------------------------
From nobody Mon Jan 8 13:25:26 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4198A12D7F9; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:25:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty
To: "The IESG"
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org, Yingzhen Qu , rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, yingzhen.qu@huawei.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-07: (with DISCUSS)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151544672026.11209.7712855431154575425.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 13:25:20 -0800
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 21:25:20 -0000
Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-07: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for your work on this draft. The current template for the security
consideration section was not used, could you please update the draft? I
believe this is the current working version:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-10#page-52
If there is a reason for not elaborating on data nodes per the template (too
many rw, etc.) a summary would be helpful.
From nobody Mon Jan 8 13:31:35 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5619E1241FC; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:31:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty
To: "The IESG"
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org, Yingzhen Qu , rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, yingzhen.qu@huawei.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with DISCUSS)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151544709334.11241.1527788183221266410.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 13:31:33 -0800
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 21:31:33 -0000
Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello, Thanks for your work on this draft. Could you please update the
Security Considerations to use the current template? I believe this is the
current, but that should be confirmed:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-10#page-52
From nobody Tue Jan 9 00:35:18 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316F1126D85; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 00:35:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise
To: "The IESG"
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org, Yingzhen Qu , rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, yingzhen.qu@huawei.com, rtgwg@ietf.org, rkrejci@cesnet.cz
Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151548691215.9608.18021370303630572476.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:35:12 -0800
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:35:12 -0000
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- I support Kathleen's DISCUSS.
- I like the way sections 2.2 and 2.3 are constructed. Thanks.
In section 2.4 that's a pity that we don't see which per instance oper states
and stats are available.
+--ro
+--ro statistics
+--ro
I have to refer to an appendix to find the answer
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08#appendix-A Why don't
you have the full tree as from the appendix in 2.X?
- No need to include the WG chairs in the YANG module, as per 6087bis
WG Chair: Jeff Tantsura
WG Chair: Chris Bowers
- The following two references must point to the working group documents
[I-D.bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis]
Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
Management", draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 (work in
progress), August 2017.
[I-D.bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis]
Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for IP Management",
draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 (work in progress),
August 2017.
- Thanks for the appendix B. It's always useful.
Note: I have not validated the instance.
From nobody Wed Jan 10 02:50:41 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18531200C1; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 02:50:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TDQp71ihQw1u; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 02:50:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db5eur01on0111.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.2.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CBF51200B9; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 02:50:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=m5XhKtQPukH9s9a2h6PRqdrbm7RSkegy4Q0aLHVRvrc=; b=kfvg1R4olBjFLGFMC/St19T7mvo++I4AtcHDljhmPfCT5qtXwPLDoJHqz8ufHaecOjGMx0kIZC+nKJTAojhirivJt8sZVpfgKSbo5ucTL00o3dBPYqCnJkkVeNrrq86RFl0UX4DtuurO4kGd29bUArrkDwtzThbJGqmB+8sKDPE=
Received: from AM5PR0701MB2836.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.168.155.139) by AM5PR0701MB2420.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.169.153.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.407.1; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:50:30 +0000
Received: from AM5PR0701MB2836.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::645d:a0f3:c36b:9aa3]) by AM5PR0701MB2836.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::645d:a0f3:c36b:9aa3%14]) with mapi id 15.20.0407.005; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:50:30 +0000
From: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)"
To: "Lsvr@ietf.org"
CC: "dcrouting@ietf.org" , "rtgwg@ietf.org" , "idr@ietf.org" , "Acee Lindem (acee)" , Keyur Patel , Shawn Zandi , Victor Kuarsingh , "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" , Alvaro Retana
Subject: Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion
Thread-Topic: Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion
Thread-Index: AdOJ/UwcaD75A6yMRfGV3jqNSACMxQ==
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:50:30 +0000
Message-ID:
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2a02:1810:4d67:a00:a943:b4dc:a5a0:53f3]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0701MB2420; 7:wVbqS7ALT89fjooqDFdPpIzWFml18PF/V7wGWTFK2nnLycEvVm8yif3Ax5Dj6Uim82kWZLnIweImQSft5NzsfUGxfrWQz2pOkKtDGVG9aHyIRCVlquyTXexHjvgCzCT6smJqLyqyZF/FyjbHtAcPSBrV1P0L/bR1x24SPfqd6/tox4Q097b8zGAAslwBQA46PgVl7BYhwu0qFcEk0K5OasztuGSU8l+b0kkbjG/bzvLfUQb3fPv89rzzrhi9T8w3
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;SSOR;
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI; SCL:-1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39380400002)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(346002)(376002)(199004)(189003)(105586002)(53936002)(5250100002)(2351001)(6506007)(33656002)(54906003)(6436002)(2501003)(106356001)(7696005)(39060400002)(6346003)(74316002)(25786009)(4326008)(6306002)(9686003)(305945005)(102836004)(97736004)(8656006)(6916009)(7736002)(966005)(59450400001)(478600001)(99286004)(316002)(6116002)(5660300001)(2906002)(5640700003)(14454004)(55016002)(3660700001)(81166006)(8676002)(81156014)(2900100001)(8936002)(86362001)(3280700002)(68736007)(437434002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2420; H:AM5PR0701MB2836.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 78050826-68ce-4a1b-8366-08d55817f76c
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020049)(4652020)(4534079)(4602075)(4627175)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(48565401081)(2017052603307)(7193020); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2420;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM5PR0701MB2420:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(192374486261705);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040470)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3231023)(11241501184)(806099)(944501119)(6055026)(6041268)(20161123562045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2420; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2420;
x-forefront-prvs: 0548586081
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: fTFIAipZZTiGstQYvJSIsIGraU69ei72GJj2hN9x6UguZVuRSEuFVSQ0i3rcp7e7nvN3G04yVuaxtvGT7prpxXcLcfZA6hmlTYawkXhiYftc6jtGMUw7voCrurooVEnq
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 78050826-68ce-4a1b-8366-08d55817f76c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Jan 2018 10:50:30.0744 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5PR0701MB2420
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:50:39 -0000
[Note: Target audience, and discussions should happen on lsvr@ietf.org, how=
ever "rtgwg", "idr" and "dcrouting" email lists have been added as the conc=
epts originated in those working groups]
Since dcrouting@ietf100, a few people have been discussing a possible WG ch=
arter for LSVR (Link State Vector Routing).
Here is what we have so far. Comments and improvements would be most welco=
me.=20
WG page is to be setup soon.
Subscription to LSVR mailing list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ls=
vr
Feedback (comments, edits, corrections, etc) on the draft LSVR charter is =
appreciated=20
***** DRAFT CHARTER UPDATE - JAN 10 2018 *****
=A0
Charter: LSVR - Link State Vector Routing=A0
=A0
The Link-State Vector Routing (LSVR) Working Group is chartered to develop =
and document a hybrid routing protocol utilizing a combination of link-stat=
e and path-vector routing mechanisms. =A0The LSVR WG will utilize existing =
the IPv4/IPv6 transport, packet formats, and error handling from BGP-4 (RFC=
4271). Additionally, the=A0BGP-LS NLRI encoding mechanisms defined in RFC77=
52 are utilized=A0to facilitate Link-State Vector (LSV) routing information=
distribution. An LSV is intended to be specified as a data structure compr=
ised of a link identification, link attributes, neighbor information, cost =
toward neighbors, and other attributes that are defined for control plane f=
unction and policy-based routing decisions.
=A0
The LSVR specification is initially focused on operation within a single da=
tacenter (DC) with preliminary focus on specifying functionality within a s=
ingle distribution domain. =A0Routing protocol functionality defined by LSV=
R would be typically routing within a datacenter's underlay routing plane.=
=A0
=A0
In order to achieve the noted objective, the working group will focus on st=
andardization of protocol functionality, defining Link-State Vectors (LSVs)=
, and defining standard path-vector route selection utilizing existing Dijk=
stra SPF based algorithm, BGP-4 protocol mechanics, and BGP-LS NRLI encodin=
g.
=A0
For the purposes of the initial work within the LSVR WG, and until further =
specified by the WG, the following definitions apply to this charter.
=A0
- Link-State Vector - An LSV is intended to represent a data structure (dat=
a set) comprised of link identification, link attributes, neighbor informat=
ion, cost towards neighbors, and other potential attributes that can be uti=
lized to make routing decisions.
- LSVR Distribution Domain - Initially scoped as a set of participating LSV=
R nodes in a single administrative domain.
=A0
=A0
The LSVR WG is chartered to deliver the following documents:
=A0
- Publish Applicability Statement for the use of LSVR in the Datacenter - T=
arget Status: Informational
- Publish specification document describing LSV with standard Dijkstra SPF =
route/path selection (calculation) utilizing existing BGP protocol baseline=
functionality and BGP-LS packet encoding formats - Target: Standards Track=
(Based on draft draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf)
- Publish specification documenting protocol extensions required to efficie=
ntly reuse BGP to distribute LSVs within an IPv4/IPv6 DC with scope to incl=
ude privacy and security considerations - - Target: Standards Track
- Publish YANG model specification for LSVR - - Target: Standards Track
=A0
LSVR Milestones:
=A0
- Applicability statement for LSVR in DCs: March 2019
- LSVR with standard Dijkstra path selection: March 2019
- LSV distribution using BGP transport: March 2019
- YANG specification for LSRV: July 2019
From nobody Wed Jan 10 04:13:26 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AAB126B6E; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 04:13:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To:
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151558640011.3951.4860147214941282670@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 04:13:20 -0800
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:13:20 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of the IETF.
Title : A YANG Data Model for Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)
Authors : Xufeng Liu
Athanasios Kyparlis
Ravi Parikh
Acee Lindem
Mingui Zhang
Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09.txt
Pages : 43
Date : 2018-01-10
Abstract:
This document describes a data model for Virtual Router Redundancy
Protocol (VRRP). Both version 2 and version 3 of VRRP are covered.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
From nobody Wed Jan 10 07:34:32 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2EF12D7F0; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:34:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.122
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.122 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jabil.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EqFRx63Ri3ql; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:34:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0117.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A89D912751F; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:34:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jabil.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-jabil-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=6SpuiaBa5952WzG9eEnYufATSizvEIVELgUU47p7QME=; b=RA5FCjh0dpCzsmdjhPCBvRzsOnOmcYgJx/YXA1SVabU+fh/7p7PmOvz7ljbmAJQAX3AERVlyCvqVt0JbOWaY4peaS7YYCPEJXTHUouxj7a8TuiMQf5ulOhT3W5bfWo2mGVD1YmaSPdUZp2NlWY8LrJu+3uD/wADqUuxYWbtoH0E=
Received: from BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.160.154.13) by BN3PR0201MB0866.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.160.154.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.386.5; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:34:20 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.154.13]) by BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.154.13]) with mapi id 15.20.0386.006; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:34:20 +0000
From: Xufeng Liu
To: Kathleen Moriarty , The IESG
CC: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org" , Yingzhen Qu , "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" , "yingzhen.qu@huawei.com" , "rtgwg@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Topic: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHTiMgRAyMYnSHQuE2LYeSJUUica6NtOsrQ
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:34:20 +0000
Message-ID:
References: <151544709334.11241.1527788183221266410.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151544709334.11241.1527788183221266410.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-dg-ref: PG1ldGE+PGF0IG5tPSJib2R5LnR4dCIgcD0iYzpcdXNlcnNceGxpdVxhcHBkYXRhXHJvYW1pbmdcMDlkODQ5YjYtMzJkMy00YTQwLTg1ZWUtNmI4NGJhMjllMzViXG1zZ3NcbXNnLTljNGVjMWU3LWY2MWItMTFlNy05YzQwLTE4NWUwZmUzYzQ1Y1xhbWUtdGVzdFw5YzRlYzFlOC1mNjFiLTExZTctOWM0MC0xODVlMGZlM2M0NWNib2R5LnR4dCIgc3o9IjE4MjgiIHQ9IjEzMTYwMDcyMDEyMDk2ODc2MiIgaD0idmVMU3g0eksxV2E5TFJZNHNxQlVxSGkzZ2tnPSIgaWQ9IiIgYmw9IjAiIGJvPSIxIi8+PC9tZXRhPg==
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com;
x-originating-ip: [98.191.72.170]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0201MB0866; 7:E9eCEiNZrLwdLFe/JjR4oPamsT/lLOR+wgTz0siB99yTOW/d6Z6JChtdxu1ctXEf9T17WiGCeTTWvGGvUCC4b5gjpO3JI/jk9CR+Z40+QzU/vuffWEQZmvtpeEjVUA9EGtoU1kYgvtDNCEPXvy7ksaqSTu2QbRHsQXLnvJeFriAsWig5R/Io64Ap5yZmXoGgzWvH+mkQZceWX5O2qGPZHS1WKVNaODRiFpSICylh11vRR2EE35ItbMBzxbQfmkCf
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a4f9a3a8-7791-4fed-f954-08d5583f9e21
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(48565401081)(4534020)(4602075)(4627115)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0866;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3PR0201MB0866:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(192374486261705)(50582790962513)(85827821059158);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040470)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3231023)(944501075)(6055026)(6041268)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558120)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0866; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0866;
x-forefront-prvs: 0548586081
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(366004)(396003)(376002)(39380400002)(39860400002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(51914003)(81166006)(6306002)(8676002)(33656002)(53936002)(25786009)(2950100002)(66066001)(72206003)(4326008)(55016002)(966005)(110136005)(316002)(6246003)(106356001)(54906003)(230783001)(9686003)(478600001)(8936002)(105586002)(81156014)(68736007)(80792005)(39060400002)(6436002)(77096006)(97736004)(7736002)(3660700001)(6116002)(5660300001)(229853002)(3280700002)(99286004)(14454004)(102836004)(86362001)(53546011)(2906002)(7696005)(6506007)(59450400001)(76176011)(74316002)(305945005)(3846002)(2900100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0866; H:BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: jabil.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: gILXzRPyNohO1rAu0qm6Y15AYngt1Y2YUIGqwlTSdx05bEyMcuO7Muk/24Z/cOkJKJWbuANl1wgOXyTL67UX+w==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jabil.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a4f9a3a8-7791-4fed-f954-08d5583f9e21
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Jan 2018 15:34:20.0910 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bc876b21-f134-4c12-a265-8ed26b7f0f3b
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0201MB0866
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:34:26 -0000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From nobody Wed Jan 10 07:36:24 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62B512751F; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:36:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To:
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151559857784.16461.4771906441426969858@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:36:17 -0800
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:36:18 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of the IETF.
Title : A YANG Data Model for Routing Information Protocol (RIP)
Authors : Xufeng Liu
Prateek Sarda
Vikram Choudhary
Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08.txt
Pages : 43
Date : 2018-01-10
Abstract:
This document describes a data model for the management of the
Routing Information Protocol (RIP). Both RIP version 2 and RIPng are
covered. The data model includes definitions for configuration,
operational state, and Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs).
The YANG model in this document conforms to the Network Management
Datastore Architecture (NMDA).
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip/
There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
From nobody Wed Jan 10 07:45:59 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53A812D864; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:45:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jabil.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQCdliDCBvsi; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:45:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01on0127.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC7912751F; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:45:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jabil.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-jabil-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=argzaA5dbuL7IcDEMUcuLl4n69yJqT5DmJ7x3FfOLP8=; b=0pqod2tuPyX7Xao2D/eArKTLdPD5BKCp/22ADfJxD1e9kkk071t93fZX7ThitQ8Qp33TBT+m48jBfNHOdDGuBD/7ujZo3DuoZMIZGIvkHKdD2/6TakJS2wXoeGt9N+nWhvuWS9PaWk41FfVXEYBS8ZIeiCa+2fbNV4/WstfsYLA=
Received: from BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.160.154.13) by BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.160.154.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.386.5; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:45:47 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.154.13]) by BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.154.13]) with mapi id 15.20.0386.006; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:45:47 +0000
From: Xufeng Liu
To: Benoit Claise , The IESG
CC: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org" , Yingzhen Qu , "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" , "yingzhen.qu@huawei.com" , "rtgwg@ietf.org" , "rkrejci@cesnet.cz"
Subject: RE: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Topic: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTiSTHC8LkS3Qo8EO+tOnbkkncUaNtQNjA
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:45:46 +0000
Message-ID:
References: <151548691215.9608.18021370303630572476.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151548691215.9608.18021370303630572476.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-dg-ref: PG1ldGE+PGF0IG5tPSJib2R5LnR4dCIgcD0iYzpcdXNlcnNceGxpdVxhcHBkYXRhXHJvYW1pbmdcMDlkODQ5YjYtMzJkMy00YTQwLTg1ZWUtNmI4NGJhMjllMzViXG1zZ3NcbXNnLTUwNmM5MjNmLWY2MWQtMTFlNy05YzQwLTE4NWUwZmUzYzQ1Y1xhbWUtdGVzdFw1MDZjOTI0MS1mNjFkLTExZTctOWM0MC0xODVlMGZlM2M0NWNib2R5LnR4dCIgc3o9IjI5NzAiIHQ9IjEzMTYwMDcyNzQ0MDc4NTM1NiIgaD0iNFlYWW1XT3NBalQ5SU1LdTA0YmtvellhMWU0PSIgaWQ9IiIgYmw9IjAiIGJvPSIxIi8+PC9tZXRhPg==
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com;
x-originating-ip: [98.191.72.170]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0201MB0867; 7:NVzPH8/tlps26pRfpa8++HnFUq9a8dpB+S62Rb3Smk7wvw4uFi0PF/qp6g/KX/7HhecdcCNpAeEkFGj4AQK+gj9znMvIIIgto9J0n3C8viWGUi1J3mHrh82WW1HM5fPSqESkY8/P6RorESceK7XLBvIwXyDejiUAN8hPmyidTULRPRjo2oEqxJoU0BQ4XLM3lkj/d6H2z9wMcT16GYVtTOwzOdYvyVIKuRumFlnfsvaKDBTkMTkHvmE/CiHAPhIQ
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8841e4b1-6d5a-4bc9-74d7-08d558413796
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(48565401081)(4534020)(4602075)(4627115)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0867;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3PR0201MB0867:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(50582790962513)(85827821059158)(95692535739014)(138986009662008);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040470)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3231023)(944501075)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041268)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0867; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0867;
x-forefront-prvs: 0548586081
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39380400002)(366004)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(376002)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(51914003)(3280700002)(8676002)(305945005)(6436002)(102836004)(25786009)(106356001)(229853002)(105586002)(4326008)(68736007)(7736002)(80792005)(86362001)(53546011)(33656002)(6506007)(53936002)(9686003)(5660300001)(6246003)(74316002)(966005)(72206003)(8936002)(66066001)(316002)(230783001)(81166006)(478600001)(55016002)(6116002)(54906003)(3660700001)(2906002)(81156014)(97736004)(59450400001)(2950100002)(2900100001)(77096006)(99286004)(14454004)(6306002)(110136005)(3846002)(7696005)(76176011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0867; H:BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: jabil.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: yS63xXkjxJa//P5OmeTQt8CkwzKZeVZzxur+RJlkV3womZvd2ceZIwWdaYWAIfiVnRPMzY66v2DP9bPu77c82g==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jabil.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8841e4b1-6d5a-4bc9-74d7-08d558413796
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Jan 2018 15:45:46.9643 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bc876b21-f134-4c12-a265-8ed26b7f0f3b
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0201MB0867
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:45:53 -0000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From nobody Wed Jan 10 08:01:53 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63E512D944; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:01:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zyDQoM522ntN; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B18B612D867; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:01:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8538; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1515600103; x=1516809703; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=2KidjOHDgsXOYuV9bVpMIDr8iL27miVqRcV+HoY6mfg=; b=DOIDwax1eM8DwUh55cZ8poUnwTUiM+VK+JkhuucosiupfjgjF8mtMaOD brCotmBTGP1XSS5LdtHs88WXe/UakvigdMIE+Dl54JX7nn0CyOkUWjA86 mZOROmj28ZlRLGdaoIzNXDj5LhBC6xQBOSenGhGhi4jWoban6aAnoxdpZ k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DqAQDDN1Za/xbLJq1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYQndCeEB4sYj0QniQuFKIMrhWWCAgojhRgChQkUAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BayiFIwEBAQEDI1YMBAsRBAEBKAMCAiElCQgGAQwGAgEBihcDFRCvG4InJocVD?= =?us-ascii?q?YJwAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYQgg2yBaSkMgnmCa0QBAQEBAQGBOgE?= =?us-ascii?q?SAYM2gmUFilSYUz2IC4g5hQGCGGeFNYNvhhaBVY07QIEeiAiBPDYiYFcRCDIaC?= =?us-ascii?q?BsVgmcJgwCBT0A3AYkWDRgHgh0BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,340,1511827200"; d="scan'208,217";a="1332781"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jan 2018 16:01:40 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0AG1ev5001868; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:01:40 GMT
Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with COMMENT)
To: Xufeng Liu , The IESG
Cc: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org" , Yingzhen Qu , "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" , "rtgwg@ietf.org" , "rkrejci@cesnet.cz"
References: <151548691215.9608.18021370303630572476.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Benoit Claise
Message-ID:
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:01:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------AA95C5ACCDAE32A20E4A245D"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:01:47 -0000
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------AA95C5ACCDAE32A20E4A245D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thank you Xufeng,
Just one comment left:
I have to refer to an appendix to find the answerhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08#appendix-A
Why don't you have the full tree from the appendix in a new section 2.X?
Anyway, this is a comment, so up to the responsible AD to decide.
Regards, Benoit
> Hi Benoit,
>
> Thanks for the comments. We have updated the document to address these comments, in a new revision https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09. Please check if this is ok.
>
> Regards,
> - Xufeng
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 3:35 AM
>> To: The IESG
>> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org; Yingzhen Qu
>> ; rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org; yingzhen.qu@huawei.com;
>> rtgwg@ietf.org; rkrejci@cesnet.cz
>> Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with
>> COMMENT)
>>
>> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
>> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
>> paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> - I support Kathleen's DISCUSS.
>>
>> - I like the way sections 2.2 and 2.3 are constructed. Thanks.
>> In section 2.4 that's a pity that we don't see which per instance oper states and
>> stats are available.
>>
>> +--ro
>> +--ro statistics
>> +--ro
>>
>> I have to refer to an appendix to find the answer
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08#appendix-A Why don't
>> you have the full tree as from the appendix in 2.X?
>>
>> - No need to include the WG chairs in the YANG module, as per 6087bis
>>
>> WG Chair: Jeff Tantsura
>>
>>
>> WG Chair: Chris Bowers
>>
>>
>> - The following two references must point to the working group documents
>>
>> [I-D.bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis]
>> Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
>> Management", draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 (work in
>> progress), August 2017.
>>
>> [I-D.bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis]
>> Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for IP Management",
>> draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 (work in progress),
>> August 2017.
>>
>> - Thanks for the appendix B. It's always useful.
>> Note: I have not validated the instance.
>>
--------------AA95C5ACCDAE32A20E4A245D
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----Original Message-----
From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 3:35 AM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org; Yingzhen Qu
<yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>; rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org; yingzhen.qu@huawei.com;
rtgwg@ietf.org; rkrejci@cesnet.cz
Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with
COMMENT)
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- I support Kathleen's DISCUSS.
- I like the way sections 2.2 and 2.3 are constructed. Thanks.
In section 2.4 that's a pity that we don't see which per instance oper states and
stats are available.
+--ro <per instance operational states>
+--ro statistics
+--ro <per instance statistics>
I have to refer to an appendix to find the answer
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08#appendix-A Why don't
you have the full tree as from the appendix in 2.X?
- No need to include the WG chairs in the YANG module, as per 6087bis
WG Chair: Jeff Tantsura
<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
WG Chair: Chris Bowers
<mailto:cbowers@juniper.net>
- The following two references must point to the working group documents
[I-D.bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis]
Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
Management", draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 (work in
progress), August 2017.
[I-D.bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis]
Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for IP Management",
draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 (work in progress),
August 2017.
- Thanks for the appendix B. It's always useful.
Note: I have not validated the instance.
--------------AA95C5ACCDAE32A20E4A245D--
From nobody Wed Jan 10 09:47:45 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A2B1243FE for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 09:47:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6cp4yNVGvGTE for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 09:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22c.google.com (mail-yb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19CA412DA6C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 09:47:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 65so3573963ybz.6 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 09:47:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :mime-version; bh=CRnq5IyF9JkeqUpwtO50SkyJks12ABddCVKytq2sHbs=; b=EOql80tl8vlXFcq5BGLaf+Tjvb2La4+WbmbMOd2Q0H42Va5kAFsee02GDTr9TEV4aQ 6i3/wEJbmLyaihk0I7taO+SGGCeG7cO0prMxnn4Tdv3x+7H1Mfy9de9yoEIhlSVjptE/ TzGasZ8gRi3OnlSuH5+u3MDkecRg1tB2cLGEV6SF3cwGZLGaJyHIbDPaoXz5ecRQaDzf t988dpOugzgC80wJdO8yDu+2NalxA0hX3nySzSvm9yw/Zb8EJVFz+EB3/SVVPAPvItHw jrqlwjlBmlb80DR0/a7+ypbsKifaXbrKZ3wwRKbh6mZvK9kDhbaLzcHPh9PTSUvk8b7w fxAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id :thread-topic:mime-version; bh=CRnq5IyF9JkeqUpwtO50SkyJks12ABddCVKytq2sHbs=; b=byYWYnX+bzWWd5zVoIOQ9AsI3s5F3+NkOgEXBPhwBt//kD67YK61lg3giS6cOoL2vL Kl9JEd70vw0z3bioAmnmZgUssEZjk1vkI9IrXVh4wwCrs2P+mWPbW+Wh+l6BheEbywoU o53pFiKD2SWxv/T0Ws/nNc8fBEYeguFptNLiwxA2bqRa2e6klO+h2m5KgLCvlcLv9yGJ mHaT4bG4Q6JcYrdjLyxv9BLUtbxm1ZdV5knUerJuQfcgL/2b3pGoM3X3+g2mgFVeePil GMbssFG/8dqtAV9ssqWNImVbdRjgYwerAXL2cdypySvoDPAoQ1awKxlUle3Q+jj78Np5 Lh2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfMV4h3hWJ5nkemnzS4i2x9yoGquXUJYAR7EC76EZq6i1A8lx4I eWnlmFuRBQIAK/IwaMVjpJ8W3Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoufGYq946iH22BEUL+ElVmAgaGIAtxyOa/L7kFGIuyNbqGApmeduYSEK6Buf5PzCMaLTTCBmQ==
X-Received: by 10.37.178.160 with SMTP id k32mr5211538ybj.211.1515606439231; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 09:47:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [135.227.239.108] ([66.201.62.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t66sm7275557ywa.61.2018.01.10.09.47.18 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 09:47:18 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.27.0.171010
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 09:47:18 -0800
Subject: Change in affiliation - Nuagenetworks
From: Jeff Tantsura
To: RTGWG
Message-ID: <3F516F60-CA62-46B2-A675-B7CF2829EA35@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Change in affiliation - Nuagenetworks
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3598422438_1954870043"
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:47:40 -0000
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--B_3598422438_1954870043
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Dear RTGWG,
=20
Happy New Year everyone!
=20
I=E2=80=99d like to update you - as of this week, I=E2=80=99ll start working with Nuage=
networks .
=20
Cheers,
Jeff=20
=20
--B_3598422438_1954870043
Content-type: text/html;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Dear RTGWG,
Happy New Year everyone!
I=E2=80=99d like to update you - as of this week=
, I=E2=80=99ll start working with Nuagenetworks .
Cheers,
Jeff
--B_3598422438_1954870043--
From nobody Wed Jan 10 11:01:07 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D30A1200B9; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:01:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty
To: "The IESG"
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org, Yingzhen Qu , rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, yingzhen.qu@huawei.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151561086017.18431.2961473370649733839.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:01:00 -0800
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:01:00 -0000
Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for applying the Security Considerations template and noting the sensitive branches.
From nobody Wed Jan 10 11:02:22 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11C112DA06; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:02:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5_5fagpnfqxQ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:02:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com (mail-pg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68C2F127023; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:02:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t67so33063pgc.5; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:02:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xqf8F7qmqzTB3hO81prSEm3AY0E+oCw1jNa0nFQsJy8=; b=pTCTBYI2mkNWOqsEFWQ1b/tb3sW+3/hn648xX3pn22B0msjas5pZVxKB9DJLaOwQfH /k6SMW16qgZeb6bX7adVJrWOm8Uma5EuQ4H3pvy1a6sUK/afmpva6vz9xyCzXg8xJVPU CiygTPonTRmNNemJbkB3xlwfUXerukVLVNl6E2UmNQ5VdopRwEdfFnDZQAK2NBi2uHWp ekzWDUiZ2YTqot6cGSjzHO/f0H4r1LdXQoJCAFY77xT2LaYV3H4gkdGuMLXda7XSxvmT iqRJX/m7fHpqrwf/er9MT4VXxnPmA8em+6Ooo8up1xCvQ1n0Z53vg1ciSrrNNhfanxOp TWLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xqf8F7qmqzTB3hO81prSEm3AY0E+oCw1jNa0nFQsJy8=; b=mi8Ab5b+stNCQJgZnMgwwKkC6Se9sMAh64i/sBWCZAKIniYWKUsQhRL0rlttztEbp9 xrThYdNXgVFjQwh5IQaoe5oH1JuLMsiE45y3o3KXVAe48xCTfZEp9Y+wv1ZgAUcwoqri LY0efTd3QHYnD5LHRlT51AgAOcFczWfvJ7x8FiUjk2OBsflz/c9TM4ZPzeW4CzKCL2iz /HwLkTFMG6Rcy3AjUNZE3t+fl7U+5UY+qY1vcL9VJwh5Ko2rEhvqaLauCKOvdQDmjG8g uWcWWrw9Q8ljdVFbWvGcrDwP4Zv+w4K9gxt+IOYEaukV4GAy7zyGLSWx0bcYPXKX0AoI pi7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIoXoEB8+x8TFBrfvRZxYMhScvF7GEpQ7M6tER77zp5nb0rZ+kZ n6z4OgWA/1/dESWlFqMoq6jMTaaERndWgIJoHaU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovvGqx1ZzmuvT9ttf6dkAazp5Xx6qdgLysYTiLyh8qAG9+uMb3n8q1N/Jt5QySo6GIza4R/OnmnEmiYeFGAxkw=
X-Received: by 10.124.25.5 with SMTP id c5mr14646609plz.225.1515610937885; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:02:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.186.208 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:01:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
References: <151544709334.11241.1527788183221266410.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:01:37 -0500
Message-ID:
Subject: Re: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with DISCUSS)
To: Xufeng Liu
Cc: The IESG , "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org" , "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" , "yingzhen.qu@huawei.com" , "rtgwg@ietf.org"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:02:21 -0000
Thank you, Xufeng!
I checked and cleared my discuss.
Best regards,
Kathleen
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Xufeng Liu wrote:
> Hi Kathleen,
>
> Thanks for the comment. We have updated the document with the new security template, and submitted a new version https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09. Please check if this is ok.
>
> Regards,
> - Xufeng
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 4:32 PM
>> To: The IESG
>> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org; Yingzhen Qu
>> ; rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org; yingzhen.qu@huawei.com;
>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>> Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with
>> DISCUSS)
>>
>> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: Discuss
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
>> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
>> paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Hello, Thanks for your work on this draft. Could you please update the Security
>> Considerations to use the current template? I believe this is the current, but that
>> should be confirmed:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-10#page-52
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Best regards,
Kathleen
From nobody Wed Jan 10 11:45:02 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73829124207; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:44:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=lxP1p1Fy; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=jEwtycic
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HLbSIhQjx4Yq; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:44:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A7BC12D88D; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:44:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02B820AEA; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:44:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:44:49 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=T8yKHzD7c2DQwy9WfvsWtAgKjYki0 zFKmWuhRl9qCP4=; b=lxP1p1FylF7L5gGg/cKN7YLJvZoKadB3Ltpaj5CQqvtba 1xs9UB6Zi3+9lo6oRnAL7pAtb8ZoP+x9vOFHizp1GhanP0iltUsnlqYEqrVMLyJX uYLHMPDaupjhI2dJOix4b01A6YAgFre1l62o7XDIZ1uIPpvieF34PMsOe5mtiXjW OVjMiA9DOdoqUvvLY+RZhkc4jlAaT/PezL9WesPSBVRxVRIj5YSigmyVqdIw6P0a bjKJMS8qZuS4fB41L9TKC7bxtGGwovwX8FUIvTci3SEUOyHDztEwGYmLQ8UyQmCj NQy26vpzYz48SK/HDAOtYeKMDag75sJ6t/QdyTN3g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=T8yKHz D7c2DQwy9WfvsWtAgKjYki0zFKmWuhRl9qCP4=; b=jEwtycicEoOfYSx+jR3vCa sxa2pFSV4jR/JQ1njRcemlGGUrC0Pp2JpDmeJhuq6QI3jVZL98uZWESQpwda/BFj xBir2hAecDSmBiFGW57tUBVm3g90+s1MZt87031q+uiZKvaSbUsAR2fkntwkJn4E VQTVMSdvFtl+/ZcJG8brN/ta5oNPbgTRjTU+10O69XaSHn2iR6r03E7cT5q+XC1Q rMVVg/YnQd3ir0BNlZTcr4qcKd+cJOCfHPzkyHOBNB90NjepIFQiVjDelMiDOXyn rF+9wS9k8fYbqnh67s2kIqxmjrC+KsKVLDzdlGA7P+lu0g9klaOiKR9BAH8CCx3A ==
X-ME-Sender:
Received: from sjc-alcoop-8812.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.179]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A6AF47E34B; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:44:48 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-07
From: Alissa Cooper
In-Reply-To: <151384104876.12916.3604252258987354065@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:44:46 -0500
Cc: gen-art , draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip.all@ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0272A530-6D02-48EE-8446-9B2EBA45A8C0@cooperw.in>
References: <151384104876.12916.3604252258987354065@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Roni Even
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:44:53 -0000
Roni, thanks for your reviews of this document. Authors, thanks for =
addressing Roni=E2=80=99s comments. I have entered a No Objection =
ballot.
Alissa
> On Dec 21, 2017, at 2:24 AM, Roni Even wrote:
>=20
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review result: Ready
>=20
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>=20
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>=20
> .
>=20
> Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-??
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review Date: 2017-12-20
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-12
> IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-11
>=20
> Summary:
> The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC
> Major issues:
>=20
> Minor issues:
>=20
> Nits/editorial comments:=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
From nobody Wed Jan 10 11:46:55 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822011200B9; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:46:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jabil.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MUjGBDhYtAYT; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:46:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03on0121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.40.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96FB2124207; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:46:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jabil.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-jabil-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=HWE9GObHxSPDSZmzyoXbz80rn1TjFkRYtXvqqgGshvM=; b=GQRYzRBfkkdcEGcnRse6X9Mfz0z0FBQgcEwE2Liq/LDQWHIAchDKRd2wDpRrNVRQDSll3S8Mk5zsnPkNRNWOMdsRdcUZQoDKQsBGH/3zaLpSAVQVJc6gg6R7SxNC5F3KkUV58bkINdwU1KDgwe+9urQDB2R8DoU8Lp0UVv2xcfQ=
Received: from BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.160.154.13) by BN3PR0201MB0865.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.160.154.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.386.5; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:46:47 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.154.13]) by BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.154.13]) with mapi id 15.20.0386.006; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:46:47 +0000
From: Xufeng Liu
To: Kathleen Moriarty , The IESG
CC: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org" , Yingzhen Qu , "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" , "yingzhen.qu@huawei.com" , "rtgwg@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-07: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Topic: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-07: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHTiMcwDz8gJ7c1NUKqKSlWasZ4s6NtQGXg
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:46:47 +0000
Message-ID:
References: <151544672026.11209.7712855431154575425.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151544672026.11209.7712855431154575425.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-dg-ref: PG1ldGE+PGF0IG5tPSJib2R5LnR4dCIgcD0iYzpcdXNlcnNceGxpdVxhcHBkYXRhXHJvYW1pbmdcMDlkODQ5YjYtMzJkMy00YTQwLTg1ZWUtNmI4NGJhMjllMzViXG1zZ3NcbXNnLTZmOGUzZTc5LWY2M2UtMTFlNy05YzQwLTE4NWUwZmUzYzQ1Y1xhbWUtdGVzdFw2ZjhlM2U3YS1mNjNlLTExZTctOWM0MC0xODVlMGZlM2M0NWNib2R5LnR4dCIgc3o9IjE5NzciIHQ9IjEzMTYwMDg2OTcxNTQwODQ1NSIgaD0iTnJlNXFqUkRUeE9FOWJrRDR0UEViNERHRjBzPSIgaWQ9IiIgYmw9IjAiIGJvPSIxIi8+PC9tZXRhPg==
x-originating-ip: [98.191.72.170]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0201MB0865; 6:rBfG8CgUl1yBW/Fe2daMIv4HkoOqm+ofhWa5jkebAIw1qrXOJJY8W4+vJi7K+uSaFSDok+KDAdmWScR5zom1yo+2We9KT3L+uBbsQArHX1lyAkb0Qs5cEF266Jq53y+jKEnT1fmfyWFieKNpV8uIOqVW8bwMcWTkUqeX6/ldguNmCV0aUR5ZPoYwE2OIZS1zqnUW7wH8XAe7jKvQhjE9O1U/jK0CZzLyIbcHW5sE96XEPfjerBOdWxvTw1vgs1+jfZHv+EAvom5Hc9KKDEv6Dw8AdpMjR2qSxQ4LC77oTJvkop/lqD8oZdhzCqAxWCibVjcjsiJSAwjP55qYIr8NBOqD22gOffLBcVSs7RIIbf1/8eeLdcjS7JxaAtbND1zV; 5:+IfpYeRw5PwLhR4bvo2KTUZiFj7DkhvfyTM98IxO7XUla+PNMtfjaFmQTHfSdycakGwtUciuyhQOQtIvtamvlOh7ChkWNyB+yLqM9/NaYGp2s87ox4EuBu5G3B5RR6RyKsrTAkufNPJUADdB4WwvicXqYGVfT9IAQuKq4HGaNQo=; 24:UqhLtVNUit7QTTH+z9pojR4SHmTyCQHupsmjQr7QTIyI5QQVwQLMSnR+Q8tIidEBULtIgcFt2OOcxWg8MKwQuaJ59xZtvG8sjIdGZvxsq7g=; 7:8MWEvd8/+jH2oR5UDTkZs0ZnpuPn1H6vrGpENYqET80ooyVUOeRD4M/g9Dnazqococ1afGGccEgS1XGQ/GNAshj7iBnF0CvePEyGBlN3mnHO3KYlayZA+9wl+4mOmw1Zj2WTYRGwmGLEKcLT4f698sel9cSPDLtaZuoTvT4KCOccYLl1Kpy95DgcIccNP6dqG4d7HNXrLlKj4QZL5/VXlsmGdvNeyd8PDV25/LFjk/Lqkh1HE3KLLhN60yM13xWp
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b6e61591-eb40-445e-c60f-08d55862e29f
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020055)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0865;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3PR0201MB0865:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(192374486261705)(50582790962513)(85827821059158);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040470)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231023)(944501121)(6055026)(6041268)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0865; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0865;
x-forefront-prvs: 0548586081
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(39380400002)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(13464003)(199004)(189003)(86362001)(5660300001)(230783001)(55016002)(66066001)(3846002)(77096006)(74316002)(6246003)(8936002)(2906002)(6116002)(105586002)(80792005)(8676002)(76176011)(59450400001)(3280700002)(81156014)(81166006)(106356001)(2950100002)(3660700001)(68736007)(7736002)(2900100001)(4326008)(6306002)(53546011)(110136005)(7696005)(54906003)(316002)(6506007)(97736004)(33656002)(229853002)(9686003)(14454004)(102836004)(99286004)(478600001)(6436002)(53936002)(72206003)(305945005)(25786009)(39060400002)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0865; H:BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: jabil.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: gOoXNISg8iEu7fhVr9pI1YamI1QEBMPwcQaUgGSQHP5bK/m1867KXBbxLGsK9GQqisQSJT467Apnv2LoXxEblA==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jabil.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b6e61591-eb40-445e-c60f-08d55862e29f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Jan 2018 19:46:47.4016 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bc876b21-f134-4c12-a265-8ed26b7f0f3b
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0201MB0865
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:46:54 -0000
SGkgS2F0aGxlZW4sDQoNClRoYW5rcyBmb3IgcG9pbnRpbmcgb3V0IHRoZSBsYXRlc3Qgc2VjdXJp
dHkgdGVtcGxhdGUuIFdlIGhhdmUgdXBkYXRlZCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgd2l0aCB0aGUgbmV3IHNl
Y3VyaXR5IHRlbXBsYXRlLCBhbmQgc3VibWl0dGVkIGEgbmV3IHZlcnNpb24gaHR0cHM6Ly90b29s
cy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtcnRnd2cteWFuZy1yaXAtMDguIFBsZWFzZSBjaGVj
ayBpZiBpdCBpcyBvay4NCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNCi0gWHVmZW5nDQoNCj4gLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBN
ZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4gRnJvbTogS2F0aGxlZW4gTW9yaWFydHkgW21haWx0bzpLYXRobGVlbi5N
b3JpYXJ0eS5pZXRmQGdtYWlsLmNvbV0NCj4gU2VudDogTW9uZGF5LCBKYW51YXJ5IDgsIDIwMTgg
NDoyNSBQTQ0KPiBUbzogVGhlIElFU0cgPGllc2dAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQo+IENjOiBkcmFmdC1pZXRm
LXJ0Z3dnLXlhbmctcmlwQGlldGYub3JnOyBZaW5nemhlbiBRdQ0KPiA8eWluZ3poZW4ucXVAaHVh
d2VpLmNvbT47IHJ0Z3dnLWNoYWlyc0BpZXRmLm9yZzsgeWluZ3poZW4ucXVAaHVhd2VpLmNvbTsN
Cj4gcnRnd2dAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4gU3ViamVjdDogS2F0aGxlZW4gTW9yaWFydHkncyBEaXNjdXNz
IG9uIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtcnRnd2cteWFuZy1yaXAtMDc6ICh3aXRoDQo+IERJU0NVU1MpDQo+IA0K
PiBLYXRobGVlbiBNb3JpYXJ0eSBoYXMgZW50ZXJlZCB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGJhbGxvdCBwb3Np
dGlvbiBmb3INCj4gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1ydGd3Zy15YW5nLXJpcC0wNzogRGlzY3Vzcw0KPiANCj4g
V2hlbiByZXNwb25kaW5nLCBwbGVhc2Uga2VlcCB0aGUgc3ViamVjdCBsaW5lIGludGFjdCBhbmQg
cmVwbHkgdG8gYWxsIGVtYWlsDQo+IGFkZHJlc3NlcyBpbmNsdWRlZCBpbiB0aGUgVG8gYW5kIEND
IGxpbmVzLiAoRmVlbCBmcmVlIHRvIGN1dCB0aGlzIGludHJvZHVjdG9yeQ0KPiBwYXJhZ3JhcGgs
IGhvd2V2ZXIuKQ0KPiANCj4gDQo+IFBsZWFzZSByZWZlciB0byBodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9y
Zy9pZXNnL3N0YXRlbWVudC9kaXNjdXNzLWNyaXRlcmlhLmh0bWwNCj4gZm9yIG1vcmUgaW5mb3Jt
YXRpb24gYWJvdXQgSUVTRyBESVNDVVNTIGFuZCBDT01NRU5UIHBvc2l0aW9ucy4NCj4gDQo+IA0K
PiBUaGUgZG9jdW1lbnQsIGFsb25nIHdpdGggb3RoZXIgYmFsbG90IHBvc2l0aW9ucywgY2FuIGJl
IGZvdW5kIGhlcmU6DQo+IGh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LWll
dGYtcnRnd2cteWFuZy1yaXAvDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IC0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t
LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCj4gRElTQ1VT
UzoNCj4gLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t
LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQ0KPiANCj4gVGhhbmtzIGZvciB5b3VyIHdvcmsgb24gdGhpcyBk
cmFmdC4gIFRoZSBjdXJyZW50IHRlbXBsYXRlIGZvciB0aGUgc2VjdXJpdHkNCj4gY29uc2lkZXJh
dGlvbiBzZWN0aW9uIHdhcyBub3QgdXNlZCwgY291bGQgeW91IHBsZWFzZSB1cGRhdGUgdGhlIGRy
YWZ0PyAgSSBiZWxpZXZlDQo+IHRoaXMgaXMgdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgd29ya2luZyB2ZXJzaW9uOg0K
PiBodHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1uZXRtb2QtcmZjNjA4N2Jp
cy0xMCNwYWdlLTUyDQo+IA0KPiBJZiB0aGVyZSBpcyBhIHJlYXNvbiBmb3Igbm90IGVsYWJvcmF0
aW5nIG9uIGRhdGEgbm9kZXMgcGVyIHRoZSB0ZW1wbGF0ZSAodG9vDQo+IG1hbnkgcncsIGV0Yy4p
IGEgc3VtbWFyeSB3b3VsZCBiZSBoZWxwZnVsLg0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KDQo=
From nobody Wed Jan 10 11:53:20 2018
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55290124207; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:53:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=H1L2Z1B0; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Yi4QWr+4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mYAgQScohneg; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4765E126DED; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7CC20AC5; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:53:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:53:08 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Y81pzhO7doiTh2lflNPnumZemureN 7Wke/9kaNI/20k=; b=H1L2Z1B09Y2s+tOQhW7CQnewILMFBaoapUNBi+MMiss6c tX2vO8U1aOKGXjxi4YpNBI156HXPwkXSM2LvzjTbs6z+tLo9s0rynL3l4wAnVf0b K3vUIRjoHKPSridr/nXv6X5Pa/bVfTSb5tkXYqapwTDjPo+5a5KjNA/K9ujj1hv0 6WhLJJoG0VF6EsEUrYxREgnzzmpyVikWtYDuKtxE71ou+q4AjxKRu+UsUvFolodG RLznVY+rhx893IIAgfJoS2EHYlzIkOuCtMq2AJxkP9aKXfYLy8+3TsnNFODcYlbd Isr7Fy9TlFBsqhK3x7DwjCQ70XwPjz8KSujo9Ec3Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Y81pzh O7doiTh2lflNPnumZemureN7Wke/9kaNI/20k=; b=Yi4QWr+4VOv5i0UX6Zzrlq khKP8hy8cQkgRrV7UfC9wC50eVC2HO+mJaEC0yoVmYeMLhRkLyNR0ahHc6OeoEfA UIc9dd3M6W09vMC8LtYatRZWcxjCk+7HPXO9Ah93NubjKocJV4x9zhN9iglJECR6 HEE8h+zyGGDBLNC2MCHomu+0xkeJ4rCDw/IU3nbbeIxoSjbZBNB+EMeGwZUjg0mk T2ZZjX4voiwc2uuuRAM5pstIBFNBErAYKZp5PrNl3gjo/eh1lsWwxKAideLS1gMY axF5GsT1XAFYJH6IW2JvcgeivutG9HY3fRTZOJca0Y/CXrTjk7zTeejppOi3hnmg ==
X-ME-Sender:
Received: from sjc-alcoop-8812.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.179]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 85AAF7E4EE; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:53:07 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07
From: Alissa Cooper
In-Reply-To:
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:53:05 -0500
Cc: Linda Dunbar , "gen-art@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp.all@ietf.org" , "rtgwg@ietf.org"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2424B915-77D1-4F5F-B614-02F124825C96@cooperw.in>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66AFDF7CD@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
To: Xufeng Liu
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At:
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group
List-Unsubscribe: ,