From newaccounts@138.mx01.net Wed Jul 1 22:01:20 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8573A6CF7 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -30.122
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-30.122 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, HELO_EQ_DYNAMIC=1.144, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, SARE_UNI=0.591, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iXpQdhajWzRu for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h201.168.117.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net (h201.168.117.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net [75.117.168.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CB77728C0DE for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: usefor-archive@ietf.org
Subject: Your registration #007381
From: usefor-archive@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: High
Content-Type: text/html
Message-Id: <20090702045858.CB77728C0DE@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
|
We want to put a great big grin on your face in 2009. You'll be to rejoice all year. |
| | |
|
From ndhbew@aachen2006.de Thu Jul 2 16:06:43 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA333A6807 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_UNI=0.591, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_OB_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M3MnoSJbGC3X for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aldeasamexico.com (unknown [190.191.188.138]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A7843A6B0F for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: usefor-archive@ietf.org
Subject: Invitation: 06 June
From: usefor-archive@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: High
Content-Type: text/html
Message-Id: <20090702230641.2A7843A6B0F@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
|
We want to put a great big grin on your face in 2009. You'll be to rejoice all year. |
| | |
|
From rainbow@komorineko.b.to Sat Jul 4 05:12:15 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBF53A687D for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 05:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.906
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_80=2, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HELO_EQ_DYNAMIC=1.144, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bkRMjc0u4kZ0 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 05:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host47-81-dynamic.18-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it (host47-81-dynamic.18-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.18.81.47]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 190343A6359 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 05:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4b1c2d1e38f2f86a1e2a2c7bsciential@komorineko.b.to>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:12:45 +0100
From: Kissam
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: usefor-archive@lists.ietf.org
Subject: Pelasing a Woman - The Right Way to Please Hrer sexually
Pleasing a Woman - The Right Wzay to Pleasse Her sexually www. ca26. net. Lost letter returned to sender aftber 52 yeavrs
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Sat Jul 4 15:49:13 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E5B3A68B6 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5bqzDZyOJ6Gi for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8E03A69BB for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n64Mgh2W024491 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n64MggGM024490; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu (smtp3.Stanford.EDU [171.67.219.83]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n64MgV4G024476 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from eagle@windlord.stanford.edu)
Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 731EE1A045E for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.67.225.134]) by smtp3.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461131A045A for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 05B972F566; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Subject: Proposed changes for
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
From: Russ Allbery
Organization: The Eyrie
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:42:31 -0700
Message-ID: <877hyoxe7c.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
I think I received no feedback for this proposed diff other than
agreement from Julien. Given that we're in AUTH48, in the absence of
more consensus on the list that this is worth pushing at this phase, I'm
not going to try to ask the RFC Editor to include it.
So if you want me to push for this change, please speak up now.
Index: usepro.xml
===================================================================
--- usepro.xml (revision 5949)
+++ usepro.xml (working copy)
@@ -2022,14 +2022,24 @@
the valid groups in all hierarchies or sub-hierarchies with a
prefix listed in the <chkscope> argument, excluding any
sub-hierarchy where the <chkscope> argument is prefixed by
- "!". If no <chkscope> argument is given, it applies to all
+ "!". For complex cases with multiple <chkscope> arguments,
+ start from an empty list of groups, include all groups in the
+ checkgroups control message matching <chkscope> arguments
+ without a "!" prefix, and then exclude all groups matching
+ <chkscope> arguments with a "!" prefix. Follow this method
+ regardless of the order of the <chkscope> arguments in the
+ Control header field.
+
+ If no <chkscope> argument is given, it applies to all
hierarchies for which group statements appear in the body of the
- message. Since much existing software does not honor the
- <chkscope> argument, the body of the checkgroups control
- message MUST NOT contain group statements for newsgroups outside
- the intended scope and SHOULD contain a correct newsgroup list
- even for sub-hierarchies excluded with "!" <chkscope> terms.
- News servers, however, MUST honor <chkscope> as specified
+ message.
+
+ Since much existing software does not honor the <chkscope>
+ argument, the body of the checkgroups control message MUST NOT
+ contain group statements for newsgroups outside the intended
+ scope and SHOULD contain a correct newsgroup list even for
+ sub-hierarchies excluded with "!" <chkscope> terms. News
+ servers, however, MUST honor <chkscope> as specified
here.
The <chksernr> argument may be any positive integer. If
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
From jpbzbruhfd@a-mea.com Sun Jul 5 01:47:11 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C94F3A68B0 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 01:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.69
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.69 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, SARE_UNI=0.591, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_OB_SURBL=10, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gvVHiju7tbWn for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 01:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 77-85-121-36.btc-net.bg (77-85-121-36.btc-net.bg [77.85.121.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D2BA73A68E2 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 01:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
To: usefor-archive@ietf.org
Subject: Invitation: 06 June
From: usefor-archive@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: High
Content-Type: text/html
Message-Id: <20090705084707.D2BA73A68E2@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 01:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
|
We want to put a great big grin on your face in 2009. You'll be to rejoice all year. |
| | |
|
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Sun Jul 5 02:24:37 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365643A63EC for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.982
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.982 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.316, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YR1Fbn-+Iog7 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41C93A68E2 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n659JxQv054142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:19:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n659Jxr7054141; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:19:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n659JlW8054128 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:19:58 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from julien@trigofacile.com)
Received: (qmail 14573 invoked by uid 503); 5 Jul 2009 09:19:45 -0000
Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail435.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:19:45 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:19:45 -0000
Received: from aaubervilliers-151-1-15-95.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO Iulius) (julien%trigofacile.com@83.114.14.95) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:19:43 -0000
Message-ID: <066F71B63D1A42D8A51A099378A196F2@Iulius>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?=
To:
References: <877hyoxe7c.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <877hyoxe7c.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Proposed changes for
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:19:39 +0200
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 8083679858036571577
X-Ovh-Remote: 83.114.14.95 (aaubervilliers-151-1-15-95.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.5/N
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Hi all,
> I think I received no feedback for this proposed diff other than
> agreement from Julien.
Harald was also in favour of a diff (but it was before you actually
wrote it):
http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/msg04638.html
"It seems to me that since we're incompatible with something
people will also know about (wildmat), flagging the
incompatibility is important."
> Given that we're in AUTH48, in the absence of
> more consensus on the list that this is worth pushing at this phase, I'm
> not going to try to ask the RFC Editor to include it.
Please note that if this diff is not in USEPRO, it will lead to various
incompatible implementations of checkgroups processing, like this one
we have already seen on news.software.nntp:
"When one expression describes a subset of another expression in an
opposite manner (inclusion vs. exclusion), an order of processing is
necessary to resolve the conflicting directives.
Given: a, a.b, a.b.c, a.b.c.d
In the order "a !a.b a.b.c !a.b.c.d", natural left-to-right processing is
the same as superset-subset order, so what results is that we include "all
of a not in a.b except all of a.b.c not in a.b.c.d".
However, let's make the order: "!a.b.c.d a.b.c !a.b a". Processing
superset-subset order will result as above, but left-to right will result
as "include all of a" and the other three expressions are rendered
meaningless. The syntax may not care. The semantics of order processing
DOES care.
Exclusion lacks the commutative property; order matters. If the elements
may appear in any syntactic order, the order of application of their use
must be defined, else different answers can ensue. We should not have
ambiguous results."
> + For complex cases with multiple <chkscope> arguments,
> + start from an empty list of groups, include all groups in the
> + checkgroups control message matching <chkscope> arguments
> + without a "!" prefix, and then exclude all groups matching
> + <chkscope> arguments with a "!" prefix. Follow this method
> + regardless of the order of the <chkscope> arguments in the
> + Control header field.
That solves the issue.
--
Julien ÉLIE
« There's a way of transferring funds that is even faster
than electronic banking. It's called marriage. » (Sam Kinison)
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Sun Jul 5 02:28:25 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A6C3A69D0 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.257
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.257 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.993, BAYES_40=-0.185, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001, TVD_FINGER_02=2.134]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CLFxO-2AaOIo for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0583A68E2 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n659QFsF054384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:26:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n659QFRY054383; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:26:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n659QDxg054375 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:26:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from julien@trigofacile.com)
Received: (qmail 3790 invoked by uid 503); 5 Jul 2009 09:26:13 -0000
Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail435.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:26:13 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:26:13 -0000
Received: from aaubervilliers-151-1-15-95.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO Iulius) (julien%trigofacile.com@83.114.14.95) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:26:12 -0000
Message-ID:
From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?=
To: "Usefor WG"
References:
In-Reply-To:
Subject: Re: USEAGE referenced for Archive
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:26:08 +0200
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 8193173622452583865
X-Ovh-Remote: 83.114.14.95 (aaubervilliers-151-1-15-95.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.5/N
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Hi Charles,
> The following text was planned for useage-02. Maybe I will even get around
> to useage-02 :-).
OK, thanks for the pointer.
I transmitted the information to Xavier Roche and for his NoCeM notices
sent to news.lists.filters (and soon to fr.usenet.abus.nocem -- that's
for it we needed the information to mention the headers in the charter),
he now uses both of them:
X-No-Archive: Yes
Archive: No
It will maybe take a long time before switching to only the Archive: header...
--
Julien ÉLIE
« -- Par Thor !
-- Par Odin !
-- Par exemple ! » (Astérix)
From battledore@av8.co.nz Sun Jul 5 11:08:42 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97EA3A6AAD for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.883
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.883 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zwUis532ISOv for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uabbrw.orange.es (1.pool85-55-55.dynamic.orange.es [85.55.55.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B642B3A6802 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: "battledore"
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:09:05 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-4"
To: usefor-archive@lists.ietf.org
Message-ID:
Subject: Cunnilingus iTps - 4 Steps too Great Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus Tips - 44 Steeps to Great Cunnilingus www. via76. com. Mountain Breaks Laand Speed Record
From krissy4477@advest.com Wed Jul 8 19:42:04 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9E53A6FEF for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, SARE_UNI=0.591, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_OB_SURBL=10, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jUtwFkJHB8hV for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bzq-84-109-50-173.red.bezeqint.net (bzq-84-109-50-173.red.bezeqint.net [84.109.50.173]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 985DD3A6C2C for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
To:
Subject: Your iTunes Account #812748
From: Pfizer Inc.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: High
Content-Type: text/html
Message-Id: <20090709024157.985DD3A6C2C@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
|
We want to put a great big grin on your face in 2009. You'll be to rejoice all year. |
| | |
|
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Sun Jul 12 14:18:38 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91983A6C5B for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.230, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m75ZDrln9NGe for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44C73A6927 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6CLFZaE012146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:15:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6CLFZOs012145; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:15:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6CLFX85012138 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:15:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from harald@alvestrand.no)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667C539E24F; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:15:33 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74rh4Uv51Slo; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:15:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.54] (162.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.162]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D5939E217; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:15:28 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4A5A5270.5060206@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:15:28 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russ Allbery
CC: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Subject: Re: Proposed changes for
References: <877hyoxe7c.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <877hyoxe7c.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Russ Allbery skrev:
> I think I received no feedback for this proposed diff other than
> agreement from Julien. Given that we're in AUTH48, in the absence of
> more consensus on the list that this is worth pushing at this phase, I'm
> not going to try to ask the RFC Editor to include it.
>
> So if you want me to push for this change, please speak up now.
>
I'd like to see this change.
> Index: usepro.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- usepro.xml (revision 5949)
> +++ usepro.xml (working copy)
> @@ -2022,14 +2022,24 @@
> the valid groups in all hierarchies or sub-hierarchies with a
> prefix listed in the <chkscope> argument, excluding any
> sub-hierarchy where the <chkscope> argument is prefixed by
> - "!". If no <chkscope> argument is given, it applies to all
> + "!". For complex cases with multiple <chkscope> arguments,
> + start from an empty list of groups, include all groups in the
> + checkgroups control message matching <chkscope> arguments
> + without a "!" prefix, and then exclude all groups matching
> + <chkscope> arguments with a "!" prefix. Follow this method
> + regardless of the order of the <chkscope> arguments in the
> + Control header field.
> +
> + If no <chkscope> argument is given, it applies to all
> hierarchies for which group statements appear in the body of the
> - message. Since much existing software does not honor the
> - <chkscope> argument, the body of the checkgroups control
> - message MUST NOT contain group statements for newsgroups outside
> - the intended scope and SHOULD contain a correct newsgroup list
> - even for sub-hierarchies excluded with "!" <chkscope> terms.
> - News servers, however, MUST honor <chkscope> as specified
> + message.
> +
> + Since much existing software does not honor the <chkscope>
> + argument, the body of the checkgroups control message MUST NOT
> + contain group statements for newsgroups outside the intended
> + scope and SHOULD contain a correct newsgroup list even for
> + sub-hierarchies excluded with "!" <chkscope> terms. News
> + servers, however, MUST honor <chkscope> as specified
> here.
>
> The <chksernr> argument may be any positive integer. If
>
>
From jerame-yntyvyys@alexanderchen.com Fri Jul 17 01:30:08 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A84E3A68DD for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, DRUGS_ERECTILE=1, DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU=1.5, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=2.02, MANGLED_OFF=2.3, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RDNS_NONE=0.1, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_OB_SURBL=10, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ReV5ZfYezE9d for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alconlabs.com (unknown [123.26.35.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C9EE3A683B for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
To:
Subject: usefor-archive, 16 Jul 2009 +4359 82% 0FF.
From: Alana Sherwood
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: High
Content-Type: text/html
Message-Id: <20090717082959.2C9EE3A683B@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Not seeing images? Click here. |
At Pfizer, we're inspired by a single goal: your health. That's why we're dedicated to developing new, safe medicines to prevent and treat the world's most serious diseases.
And why we are making them available to the people who need them most. We believe that from progress comes hope and the promise of a healthier world.
Onlyfor you! Today 85% 0FF.
|
Start Shopping |
|
|
|
|
|
Rates do not include taxes, gratuities or any additional charges that may apply. For complete
terms and conditions, please click here: Terms & Conditions.
To ensure you receive your Starwood Hotels & Resorts emails, please add
usefor-archive@ietf.org to your address book. Find out how. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© 2009 Pfizer, Inc.
You are subscribed as usefor-archive@ietf.org
Tell us if you would like your email sent to a different address.
See our Privacy Statement or call 1-123-1243-3454 from the U.S. & Canada or +34663-46346-34646in all
other countries to learn more about our data collection and usage practices.
Review the Pfizer Guest program Terms and Conditions.
Let us know if you prefer not to receive future promotional emails from Starwood Hotels & Resorts. It may take up to ten business days to make the requested change and there is a slight chance that you may receive email from us within that time. |
From kara_wilcoxb@advpayroll.com Sat Jul 18 17:51:37 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBFB3A6BC1 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -19.062
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.062 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, DRUGS_ERECTILE=1, DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU=1.5, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_OFF=2.3, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_NONE=0.1, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_OB_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8H2pHVz0aOjk for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from afaq.afnor.org (unknown [189.121.31.241]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A28613A69B6 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
To:
Subject: Dear usefor-archive, sun, 19 Jul 2009 +1150 86% 0FF.
From:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: High
Content-Type: text/html
Message-Id: <20090719005132.A28613A69B6@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Not seeing images? Click here. |
At Pfizer, we're inspired by a single goal: your health. That's why we're dedicated to developing new, safe medicines to prevent and treat the world's most serious diseases.
And why we are making them available to the people who need them most. We believe that from progress comes hope and the promise of a healthier world.
Onlyfor you! Today 83% 0FF.
|
Start Shopping |
|
|
|
|
|
Rates do not include taxes, gratuities or any additional charges that may apply. For complete
terms and conditions, please click here: Terms & Conditions.
To ensure you receive your Starwood Hotels & Resorts emails, please add
usefor-archive@yahoo.co.uk to your address book. Find out how. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© 2009 Pfizer, Inc.
You are subscribed as usefor-archive@ietf.org
Tell us if you would like your email sent to a different address.
See our Privacy Statement or call 1-486-271-4856 from the U.S. & Canada or +317-55-1111257in all
other countries to learn more about our data collection and usage practices.
Review the Pfizer Guest program Terms and Conditions.
Let us know if you prefer not to receive future promotional emails from Starwood Hotels & Resorts. It may take up to ten business days to make the requested change and there is a slight chance that you may receive email from us within that time. |
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Wed Jul 22 09:18:59 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC7B3A6B35 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jVaTRCoOyma8 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACEB3A6827 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6MGCX1u046814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:12:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6MGCXjJ046813; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:12:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from v-smtp-auth-relay-4.gradwell.net (v-smtp-auth-relay-4.gradwell.net [79.135.125.43]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6MGCLKC046792 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:12:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from news@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Received: from [80.175.135.89] ([80.175.135.89] helo=clerew.man.ac.uk country=GB ident=postmaster*pop3*clerew^man#ac^uk) by v-smtp-auth-relay-4.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.290) id 4a673a64.6ec3.133 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:12:20 +0100 (envelope-sender )
Received: from clerew.man.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n6MGC2Gj011430 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:12:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id n6MGC1ks011425 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:12:01 +0100 (BST)
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Xref: clerew local.usefor:25119
Path: clerew!chl
From: "Charles Lindsey"
Subject: Son-of-1036
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.2 (NOV)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:58:34 GMT
Lines: 20
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
The RFC Editor is proceeding with the draft I submitted in May. It will be
a Historic RFC as we had asked, but they want a line below that to state
that it is "Superseded by RFC5536 and RFC5537" (that is in addition to the
clear warnings in the Abstract and in the Preface to the effect that the
document is NOT to be considered as a basis for current implementations).
They also asked for a mention that RFC822 is now replaced by 5532.
Is there anything else that might cause confusion and that should be
warned against?
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Wed Jul 22 10:32:21 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B49F3A68AE for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.695
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.695 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001, TVD_FINGER_02=2.134]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yl3fedoirwKL for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5903C3A6877 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6MHTPKd053047 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:29:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6MHTP95053046; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:29:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from 2.mail-out.ovh.net (2.mail-out.ovh.net [91.121.26.226]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n6MHTDH0053033 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:29:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from julien@trigofacile.com)
Received: (qmail 22147 invoked by uid 503); 22 Jul 2009 19:10:51 -0000
Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail177.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 2.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 19:10:51 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 17:37:47 -0000
Received: from aaubervilliers-151-1-49-98.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO Iulius) (julien%trigofacile.com@83.114.131.98) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 17:37:46 -0000
Message-ID: <0C8DE6FE57CF4FF9AEF423A2C16AE15B@Iulius>
From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?=
To: "Usefor WG"
References:
In-Reply-To:
Subject: Re: Son-of-1036
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:29:04 +0200
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 5650328684239388089
X-Ovh-Remote: 83.114.131.98 (aaubervilliers-151-1-49-98.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Hi Charles,
> The RFC Editor is proceeding with the draft I submitted in May. It will be
> a Historic RFC as we had asked, but they want a line below that to state
> that it is "Superseded by RFC5536 and RFC5537" (that is in addition to the
> clear warnings in the Abstract and in the Preface to the effect that the
> document is NOT to be considered as a basis for current implementations).
Does it also imply that RFC 5536 and RFC 5537 will mention that they
update that RFC when dislpayed on ?
(just above "Category: Standards Track")
> Is there anything else that might cause confusion and that should be
> warned against?
Shouldn't the date "3 May 2009" be changed to "2 June 1994"? (and the sentence
"This document is identical to the last distributed version of Son of 1036,
dated 2 June 1994, except for reformatting" rewritten to say it was submitted
on May, 3rd 2009)
That date would highlight more the fact it is an *old* RFC.
It is just a suggestion; maybe it is impossible to change that date.
Thanks for all your work, Charles.
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Hâte-toi de bien vivre et songe que chaque jour
est à lui seul une vie. » (Sénèque)
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Thu Jul 23 04:15:44 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244B53A6992 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d95zO4kqwkh9 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54EB3A69AF for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6NBCX1o022268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:12:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6NBCXcV022267; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:12:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from v-smtp-auth-relay-1.gradwell.net (v-smtp-auth-relay-1.gradwell.net [79.135.125.40]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6NBCLvN022242 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:12:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from news@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Received: from [80.175.135.89] ([80.175.135.89] helo=clerew.man.ac.uk country=GB ident=postmaster&pop3&clerew*man#ac#uk) by v-smtp-auth-relay-1.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.290) id 4a684595.eae.34 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:12:21 +0100 (envelope-sender )
Received: from clerew.man.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n6NBC3kZ028385 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:12:03 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id n6NBC2UF028382 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:12:02 +0100 (BST)
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Xref: clerew local.usefor:25121
Path: clerew!chl
From: "Charles Lindsey"
Subject: Re: Son-of-1036
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.2 (NOV)
References: <0C8DE6FE57CF4FF9AEF423A2C16AE15B@Iulius>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:35:35 GMT
Lines: 44
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
In <0C8DE6FE57CF4FF9AEF423A2C16AE15B@Iulius> =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?= writes:
>Hi Charles,
>> The RFC Editor is proceeding with the draft I submitted in May. It will be
>> a Historic RFC as we had asked, but they want a line below that to state
>> that it is "Superseded by RFC5536 and RFC5537" (that is in addition to the
>> clear warnings in the Abstract and in the Preface to the effect that the
>> document is NOT to be considered as a basis for current implementations).
>Does it also imply that RFC 5536 and RFC 5537 will mention that they
>update that RFC when dislpayed on ?
>(just above "Category: Standards Track).
No. Both those documents contain non-normative references to s-o-1036, of
course, and hopefully they will refer to it via its republished form. But
I think those documents are already clear to to what they update (1036)
and that s-o-1036 was just a useful stopgap on the way to that goal.
>Shouldn't the date "3 May 2009" be changed to "2 June 1994"? (and the sentence
>"This document is identical to the last distributed version of Son of 1036,
>dated 2 June 1994, except for reformatting" rewritten to say it was submitted
>on May, 3rd 2009)
>That date would highlight more the fact it is an *old* RFC.
>It is just a suggestion; maybe it is impossible to change that date.
I doubt it would be possible, and would create more confusion than it
removed. Its Preface makes it clear what its status is, and the redacted
document, as it will be republished, it certainly not the original test
from June 1994.
>Thanks for all your work, Charles.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Thu Jul 23 05:31:54 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE553A63EB for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vIE7vZL94rDn for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972023A6358 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6NCSJHa028027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:28:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6NCSJGM028026; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:28:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from flowerpot.kaijanaho.fi (flowerpot.kaijanaho.fi [80.68.88.155]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6NCS8gR028012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:28:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from antti-juhani@kaijanaho.fi)
Received: from kukkaseppele.kaijanaho.fi (e82-103-224-145.elisa-laajakaista.fi [82.103.224.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ajk) by flowerpot.kaijanaho.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44DA029000C for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:28:08 +0300 (EEST)
Received: by kukkaseppele.kaijanaho.fi (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 678F3854327; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:28:06 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:28:06 +0300
From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Subject: Re: Son-of-1036
Message-ID: <20090723122805.GB15692@kukkaseppele.kaijanaho.fi>
References: <0C8DE6FE57CF4FF9AEF423A2C16AE15B@Iulius>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To:
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:35:35AM +0000, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> >Does it also imply that RFC 5536 and RFC 5537 will mention that they
> >update that RFC when dislpayed on ?
> >(just above "Category: Standards Track).
>
> No. Both those documents contain non-normative references to s-o-1036, of
> course, and hopefully they will refer to it via its republished form. But
> I think those documents are already clear to to what they update (1036)
> and that s-o-1036 was just a useful stopgap on the way to that goal.
It would make the connection (and their relation) explicit in indexes. It
seems to me to be a useful thing.
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland
http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/
From confronted@senigallia.chiesacattolica.it Sat Jul 25 19:23:13 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA623A6A12; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, FH_HELO_EQ_CHARTER=2.175, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC=4.295, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2=4.395, HOST_EQ_CHARTER=1.295, HOST_EQ_DHCP=1.295, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_OB_SURBL=10, URIBL_PH_SURBL=1.787, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h+ctHHPAL2R8; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 66-214-112-31.dhcp.hspr.ca.charter.com (66-214-112-31.dhcp.hspr.ca.charter.com [66.214.112.31]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA983A6A0F; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 66.214.112.31 by fmx0.glauco.it; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:24:17 -0800
Message-ID: <000d01ca0d98$2d2fd520$6400a8c0@confronted>
From: "speechsc-bounces@ietf.org"
To:
Subject: Louis Osborne sent you a postcard from 1001 Postcards!
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:24:17 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01CA0D98.2D2FD520"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CA0D98.2D2FD520
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Oh happy day! Louis Osborne sent you a postcard from 1001 Postcards!
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
Pickup your card safely and securely:
1. Go directly to your card at this address:
http://www.postcards.org/cards/cardreceive.php?id=3D36930722028296206614679=
8233899341656731&email=3Dspeechsc-bounces@ietf.org&from=3DLouis Osborne
2. Please wait while postcard is loading.
Your pickup code is: 3639-27257-18097-12227
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
Your postcard will be available for 60 days.
We hope you enjoy your postcard, and if you do, please take a moment
to send a few yourself!
Regards,
Marty & Alice at 1001 Postcards
http://www.postcards.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CA0D98.2D2FD520
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Oh happy day! Louis Osborne =
sent you a postcard from 1001 Postcards!
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Pickup your card safely and securely:
1. Go directly to your card =
at this address:
http://www.postcards.org/cards/cardreceive.php?id=3D369=
307220282962066146798233899341656731&email=3Dspeechsc-bounces@ietf.org&from=
=3DLouis Osborne
2. Please wait while postcard is loading.
Your pickup code is: 3639-2=
7257-18097-12227
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
Your postcard will be availa=
ble for 60 days.
We hope you enjoy your postc=
ard, and if you do, please take a moment
to send a few yourself!
Regards,
Marty & Alice at 1001 Postcards
http://www.postcards.org
----------------------------=
------------------------------------------------
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CA0D98.2D2FD520--
From kellydd@althous.com Sun Jul 26 20:35:13 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C4B3A6BC6 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12=2.46, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_2=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_NONE=0.1, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083, URIBL_SBL=20, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JA3SBS1rzwJn for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alunos.utad.pt (unknown [125.164.224.43]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C5ADD3A68D1 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
To:
Subject: Our target is your happy life
From: Lazaro Horne
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: High
Content-Type: text/html
Message-Id: <20090727033510.C5ADD3A68D1@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view.
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY - This is being sent
from an unattended mailbox.
Copyright © 2008 Pure Magnum, Inc. All rights reserved.
5 Trowbridge Drive, Bethel, CT 894202
You have received this message because you
opted in to receives Pure Magnum pecial offers via email.
You can unsubscribe here
From prologueca349@sma-mobili.com Sun Jul 26 22:11:27 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078803A69BF; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC=4.295, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2=4.395, HELO_EQ_BR=0.955, HELO_EQ_DSL=1.129, HOST_EQ_BR=1.295, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_PH_SURBL=1.787, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100, XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_6554A=2.981]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QxdMV6eECFyA; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 200-193-252-175.bsaco700.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br (200-193-252-175.bsaco700.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [200.193.252.175]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B803A68A3; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 200.193.252.175 by etrn.ascotlc.it; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:11:20 -0300
From: "speechsc-bounces@ietf.org"
To:
Subject: Bryce Crump sent you a postcard from 1001 Postcards!
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:11:20 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01CA0E78.ADB5AEF0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
Thread-Index: Aca6QE6N3JT4MOLC6FWGV0EUVFUFPV==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2905
Message-ID: <000d01ca0e78$adb5aef0$6400a8c0@prologueca349>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CA0E78.ADB5AEF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Oh happy day! Bryce Crump sent you a postcard from 1001 Postcards!
============================================================================
Pickup your card safely and securely:
1. Go directly to your card at this address:
http://www.postcards.org/cards/cardreceive.php?id=174207756236760317412060687753666289380503812&email=speechsc-bounces@ietf.org&from=Bryce Crump
2. Please wait while postcard is loading.
Your pickup code is: 20125-23361-16013-18741
============================================================================
Your postcard will be available for 60 days.
We hope you enjoy your postcard, and if you do, please take a moment
to send a few yourself!
Regards,
Marty & Alice at 1001 Postcards
http://www.postcards.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CA0E78.ADB5AEF0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Oh happy day! Bryce Crump se=
nt you a postcard from 1001 Postcards!
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Pickup your card safely and securely:
1. Go directly to your card =
at this address:
http://www.postcards.org/cards/cardreceive.php?id=3D=
174207756236760317412060687753666289380503812&email=3Dspeechsc-bounces@ietf=
org&from=3DBryce Crump
2. Please wait while postcard is loading.
Your pickup code is: 20125-=
23361-16013-18741
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
Your postcard will be availa=
ble for 60 days.
We hope you enjoy your postc=
ard, and if you do, please take a moment
to send a few yourself!
Regards,
Marty & Alice at 1001 Postcards
http://www.postcards.org
----------------------------=
------------------------------------------------
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CA0E78.ADB5AEF0--
From ldsesqeamesm@alliedoldenglish.com Mon Jul 27 09:32:45 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8983A6A8B for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -24.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-24.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04=2.041, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_HTML_A_BODY=0.742, SARE_HTML_IMG_ONLY=1.666, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=2.219, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_OB_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2henOJvuiI6X for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acadian.com (unknown [189.97.234.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E4183A6CB7 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
To:
Subject: RE: Message
From:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: High
Content-Type: text/html
Message-Id: <20090727163235.2E4183A6CB7@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Wed Jul 29 04:17:23 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353C43A6FEE for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NwdFg6rL6lsD for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5123A6FD3 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6TBCHsS048399 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:12:17 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6TBCGww048398; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:12:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from v-smtp-auth-relay-5.gradwell.net (v-smtp-auth-relay-5.gradwell.net [79.135.125.99]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6TBC31G048339 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:12:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from news@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Received: from [80.175.135.89] ([80.175.135.89] helo=clerew.man.ac.uk country=GB ident=postmaster^pop3#clerew*man^ac^uk) by v-smtp-auth-relay-5.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.290) id 4a702e82.27ab.bd for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:12:02 +0100 (envelope-sender )
Received: from clerew.man.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n6TBC2mk015498 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:12:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id n6TBC1jr015495 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:12:01 +0100 (BST)
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Xref: clerew local.usefor:25123
Path: clerew!chl
From: "Charles Lindsey"
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.2 (NOV)
References: <20090728090002.11D523A6D3C@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:05:45 GMT
Lines: 30
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
In <20090728090002.11D523A6D3C@core3.amsl.com> Internet-Drafts@ietf.org writes:
>--NextPart
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>directories.
> Title : "Son of 1036": News Article Format and Transmission
> Author(s) : H. Spencer
> Filename : draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
> Pages : 91
> Date : 2009-7-28
>
This just includes a few tweaks requested by the RFC-Editor. Hopefully it
is now ready for final publication.
>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
From kolexa@advdet.com Wed Jul 29 06:51:04 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9003A7034 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -25.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-25.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04=2.041, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_HTML_A_BODY=0.742, SARE_HTML_IMG_ONLY=1.666, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=2.219, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sdLuIvRvc3QX for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aeronimbus.com (unknown [118.71.145.110]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8ED593A6FAC for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
To:
Subject: Delivery Status Notification
From:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: High
Content-Type: text/html
Message-Id: <20090729135059.8ED593A6FAC@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Wed Jul 29 10:42:01 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE993A6A8F for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.695
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.695 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001, TVD_FINGER_02=2.134]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o2UU2U10xxgy for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732DA3A6843 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6THcjph082794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:38:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6THcj4l082793; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:38:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from 27.mail-out.ovh.net (27.mail-out.ovh.net [91.121.30.210]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n6THcXDY082775 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:38:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from julien@trigofacile.com)
Received: (qmail 8851 invoked by uid 503); 29 Jul 2009 19:16:33 -0000
Received: from b7.ovh.net (HELO mail425.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.57) by 27.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 29 Jul 2009 19:16:33 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 29 Jul 2009 17:38:32 -0000
Received: from aaubervilliers-151-1-76-51.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO Iulius) (julien%trigofacile.com@81.48.15.51) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 29 Jul 2009 17:38:31 -0000
Message-ID:
From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?=
To: "Usefor WG"
References: <20090728090002.11D523A6D3C@core3.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To:
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:38:19 +0200
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 9878364309177171385
X-Ovh-Remote: 81.48.15.51 (aaubervilliers-151-1-76-51.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Hi Charles,
> This just includes a few tweaks requested by the RFC-Editor. Hopefully it
> is now ready for final publication.
I have just done a diff between the two versions. Only four or five changes.
Amongst them, a sentence has been rewritten but still needs to be changed.
(", and the presence of unresolved issues.")
The technical content remains unchanged, including the references to
the document itself as a Draft rather than an RFC, the presence of
unresolved issues, The original section numbering has been preserved,
although the original pagination has not (among other reasons, it did
not fully follow IETF formatting standards).
The few typos I reported in May weren't fixed in that new version.
Have a nice day,
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Il y a un proverbe serbe qui dit ceci : « Notre passé est sinistre,
notre présent est invivable, heureusement que nous n'avons pas d'avenir ! »
(Philippe Geluck)
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Thu Jul 30 09:17:15 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5424928C345 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id skRogtOXeKmp for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E8F28C342 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6UGCDPb091164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:12:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6UGCDut091163; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:12:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from v-smtp-auth-relay-6.gradwell.net (v-smtp-auth-relay-6.gradwell.net [79.135.125.112]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6UGC4rg091145 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:12:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from news@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Received: from [80.175.135.89] ([80.175.135.89] helo=clerew.man.ac.uk country=GB ident=postmaster$pop3#clerew&man*ac$uk) by v-smtp-auth-relay-6.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.290) id 4a71c652.5ba3.399 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:12:02 +0100 (envelope-sender )
Received: from clerew.man.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n6UGC2Dm012191 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:12:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id n6UGC1Nw012186 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:12:01 +0100 (BST)
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Xref: clerew local.usefor:25125
Path: clerew!chl
From: "Charles Lindsey"
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.2 (NOV)
References: <20090728090002.11D523A6D3C@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:13:33 GMT
Lines: 28
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
In =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?= writes:
>Hi Charles,
>> This just includes a few tweaks requested by the RFC-Editor. Hopefully it
>> is now ready for final publication.
>I have just done a diff between the two versions. Only four or five changes.
>Amongst them, a sentence has been rewritten but still needs to be changed.
>(", and the presence of unresolved issues.")
OK, I seem to have missed that.
>The few typos I reported in May weren't fixed in that new version.
I vaguely recall such a list, but I can't identify your message on the
groups mailing list archive. Can you repeat them please?
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
From owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org Thu Jul 30 09:52:52 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB53828C107 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.972
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.972 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.277, BAYES_40=-0.185, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001, TVD_FINGER_02=2.134]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ygYTkmvb8gc for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8C63A6BF8 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6UGoKVL094170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:50:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6UGoJIo094169; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:50:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n6UGoCiv094151 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:50:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from julien@trigofacile.com)
Received: (qmail 7727 invoked by uid 503); 30 Jul 2009 16:50:29 -0000
Received: from b7.ovh.net (HELO mail433.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.57) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 16:50:29 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 16:50:12 -0000
Received: from aaubervilliers-151-1-76-51.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO Iulius) (julien%trigofacile.com@81.48.15.51) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 16:50:10 -0000
Message-ID: <032E8EC20F4F414893D9EA435C17365C@Iulius>
From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?=
To: "Usefor WG"
References: <20090728090002.11D523A6D3C@core3.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To:
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:50:08 +0200
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 14934499315799948729
X-Ovh-Remote: 81.48.15.51 (aaubervilliers-151-1-76-51.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Hi Charles,
>>The few typos I reported in May weren't fixed in that new version.
>
> I vaguely recall such a list, but I can't identify your message on the
> groups mailing list archive. Can you repeat them please?
Certainly.
Here are a few typos I saw while skimming the document:
http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/msg04596.html
--
Julien ÉLIE
« -- Nous voyageons plus vite que la lumière !
-- Alors comment y voir clair dans tout ça ? » (Astérix)
From mahorink@alpha.ocn.ne.jp Thu Jul 30 15:04:38 2009
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E6E3A6D11 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -20.371
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-20.371 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_60=1, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04=2.041, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_HTML_A_BODY=0.742, SARE_HTML_IMG_ONLY=1.666, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=2.219, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 354JG7dKa8c1 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from advantageint.com (unknown [118.68.71.8]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A4D2B3A6CDF for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
To:
Subject: RE: Message
From:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: High
Content-Type: text/html
Message-Id: <20090730220350.A4D2B3A6CDF@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6UGoKVL094170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:50:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6UGoJIo094169; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:50:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n6UGoCiv094151 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:50:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from julien@trigofacile.com)
Received: (qmail 7727 invoked by uid 503); 30 Jul 2009 16:50:29 -0000
Received: from b7.ovh.net (HELO mail433.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.57) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 16:50:29 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 16:50:12 -0000
Received: from aaubervilliers-151-1-76-51.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO Iulius) (julien%trigofacile.com@81.48.15.51) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 16:50:10 -0000
Message-ID: <032E8EC20F4F414893D9EA435C17365C@Iulius>
From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?=
To: "Usefor WG"
References: <20090728090002.11D523A6D3C@core3.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To:
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:50:08 +0200
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 14934499315799948729
X-Ovh-Remote: 81.48.15.51 (aaubervilliers-151-1-76-51.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Hi Charles,
>>The few typos I reported in May weren't fixed in that new version.
>
> I vaguely recall such a list, but I can't identify your message on the
> groups mailing list archive. Can you repeat them please?
Certainly.
Here are a few typos I saw while skimming the document:
http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/msg04596.html
--
Julien ÉLIE
« -- Nous voyageons plus vite que la lumière !
-- Alors comment y voir clair dans tout ça ? » (Astérix)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6UGCDPb091164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:12:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6UGCDut091163; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:12:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from v-smtp-auth-relay-6.gradwell.net (v-smtp-auth-relay-6.gradwell.net [79.135.125.112]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6UGC4rg091145 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:12:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from news@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Received: from [80.175.135.89] ([80.175.135.89] helo=clerew.man.ac.uk country=GB ident=postmaster$pop3#clerew&man*ac$uk) by v-smtp-auth-relay-6.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.290) id 4a71c652.5ba3.399 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:12:02 +0100 (envelope-sender )
Received: from clerew.man.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n6UGC2Dm012191 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:12:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id n6UGC1Nw012186 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:12:01 +0100 (BST)
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Xref: clerew local.usefor:25125
Path: clerew!chl
From: "Charles Lindsey"
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.2 (NOV)
References: <20090728090002.11D523A6D3C@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:13:33 GMT
Lines: 28
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
In =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?= writes:
>Hi Charles,
>> This just includes a few tweaks requested by the RFC-Editor. Hopefully it
>> is now ready for final publication.
>I have just done a diff between the two versions. Only four or five changes.
>Amongst them, a sentence has been rewritten but still needs to be changed.
>(", and the presence of unresolved issues.")
OK, I seem to have missed that.
>The few typos I reported in May weren't fixed in that new version.
I vaguely recall such a list, but I can't identify your message on the
groups mailing list archive. Can you repeat them please?
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6THcjph082794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:38:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6THcj4l082793; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:38:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from 27.mail-out.ovh.net (27.mail-out.ovh.net [91.121.30.210]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n6THcXDY082775 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:38:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from julien@trigofacile.com)
Received: (qmail 8851 invoked by uid 503); 29 Jul 2009 19:16:33 -0000
Received: from b7.ovh.net (HELO mail425.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.57) by 27.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 29 Jul 2009 19:16:33 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 29 Jul 2009 17:38:32 -0000
Received: from aaubervilliers-151-1-76-51.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO Iulius) (julien%trigofacile.com@81.48.15.51) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 29 Jul 2009 17:38:31 -0000
Message-ID:
From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?=
To: "Usefor WG"
References: <20090728090002.11D523A6D3C@core3.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To:
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:38:19 +0200
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 9878364309177171385
X-Ovh-Remote: 81.48.15.51 (aaubervilliers-151-1-76-51.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Hi Charles,
> This just includes a few tweaks requested by the RFC-Editor. Hopefully it
> is now ready for final publication.
I have just done a diff between the two versions. Only four or five changes.
Amongst them, a sentence has been rewritten but still needs to be changed.
(", and the presence of unresolved issues.")
The technical content remains unchanged, including the references to
the document itself as a Draft rather than an RFC, the presence of
unresolved issues, The original section numbering has been preserved,
although the original pagination has not (among other reasons, it did
not fully follow IETF formatting standards).
The few typos I reported in May weren't fixed in that new version.
Have a nice day,
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Il y a un proverbe serbe qui dit ceci : « Notre passé est sinistre,
notre présent est invivable, heureusement que nous n'avons pas d'avenir ! »
(Philippe Geluck)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6TBCHsS048399 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:12:17 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6TBCGww048398; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:12:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from v-smtp-auth-relay-5.gradwell.net (v-smtp-auth-relay-5.gradwell.net [79.135.125.99]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6TBC31G048339 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:12:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from news@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Received: from [80.175.135.89] ([80.175.135.89] helo=clerew.man.ac.uk country=GB ident=postmaster^pop3#clerew*man^ac^uk) by v-smtp-auth-relay-5.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.290) id 4a702e82.27ab.bd for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:12:02 +0100 (envelope-sender )
Received: from clerew.man.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n6TBC2mk015498 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:12:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id n6TBC1jr015495 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:12:01 +0100 (BST)
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Xref: clerew local.usefor:25123
Path: clerew!chl
From: "Charles Lindsey"
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.2 (NOV)
References: <20090728090002.11D523A6D3C@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:05:45 GMT
Lines: 30
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
In <20090728090002.11D523A6D3C@core3.amsl.com> Internet-Drafts@ietf.org writes:
>--NextPart
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>directories.
> Title : "Son of 1036": News Article Format and Transmission
> Author(s) : H. Spencer
> Filename : draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
> Pages : 91
> Date : 2009-7-28
>
This just includes a few tweaks requested by the RFC-Editor. Hopefully it
is now ready for final publication.
>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6NCSJHa028027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:28:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6NCSJGM028026; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:28:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from flowerpot.kaijanaho.fi (flowerpot.kaijanaho.fi [80.68.88.155]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6NCS8gR028012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:28:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from antti-juhani@kaijanaho.fi)
Received: from kukkaseppele.kaijanaho.fi (e82-103-224-145.elisa-laajakaista.fi [82.103.224.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ajk) by flowerpot.kaijanaho.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44DA029000C for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:28:08 +0300 (EEST)
Received: by kukkaseppele.kaijanaho.fi (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 678F3854327; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:28:06 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:28:06 +0300
From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Subject: Re: Son-of-1036
Message-ID: <20090723122805.GB15692@kukkaseppele.kaijanaho.fi>
References: <0C8DE6FE57CF4FF9AEF423A2C16AE15B@Iulius>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To:
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:35:35AM +0000, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> >Does it also imply that RFC 5536 and RFC 5537 will mention that they
> >update that RFC when dislpayed on ?
> >(just above "Category: Standards Track).
>
> No. Both those documents contain non-normative references to s-o-1036, of
> course, and hopefully they will refer to it via its republished form. But
> I think those documents are already clear to to what they update (1036)
> and that s-o-1036 was just a useful stopgap on the way to that goal.
It would make the connection (and their relation) explicit in indexes. It
seems to me to be a useful thing.
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland
http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6NBCX1o022268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:12:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6NBCXcV022267; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:12:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from v-smtp-auth-relay-1.gradwell.net (v-smtp-auth-relay-1.gradwell.net [79.135.125.40]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6NBCLvN022242 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:12:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from news@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Received: from [80.175.135.89] ([80.175.135.89] helo=clerew.man.ac.uk country=GB ident=postmaster&pop3&clerew*man#ac#uk) by v-smtp-auth-relay-1.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.290) id 4a684595.eae.34 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:12:21 +0100 (envelope-sender )
Received: from clerew.man.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n6NBC3kZ028385 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:12:03 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id n6NBC2UF028382 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:12:02 +0100 (BST)
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Xref: clerew local.usefor:25121
Path: clerew!chl
From: "Charles Lindsey"
Subject: Re: Son-of-1036
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.2 (NOV)
References: <0C8DE6FE57CF4FF9AEF423A2C16AE15B@Iulius>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:35:35 GMT
Lines: 44
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
In <0C8DE6FE57CF4FF9AEF423A2C16AE15B@Iulius> =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?= writes:
>Hi Charles,
>> The RFC Editor is proceeding with the draft I submitted in May. It will be
>> a Historic RFC as we had asked, but they want a line below that to state
>> that it is "Superseded by RFC5536 and RFC5537" (that is in addition to the
>> clear warnings in the Abstract and in the Preface to the effect that the
>> document is NOT to be considered as a basis for current implementations).
>Does it also imply that RFC 5536 and RFC 5537 will mention that they
>update that RFC when dislpayed on ?
>(just above "Category: Standards Track).
No. Both those documents contain non-normative references to s-o-1036, of
course, and hopefully they will refer to it via its republished form. But
I think those documents are already clear to to what they update (1036)
and that s-o-1036 was just a useful stopgap on the way to that goal.
>Shouldn't the date "3 May 2009" be changed to "2 June 1994"? (and the sentence
>"This document is identical to the last distributed version of Son of 1036,
>dated 2 June 1994, except for reformatting" rewritten to say it was submitted
>on May, 3rd 2009)
>That date would highlight more the fact it is an *old* RFC.
>It is just a suggestion; maybe it is impossible to change that date.
I doubt it would be possible, and would create more confusion than it
removed. Its Preface makes it clear what its status is, and the redacted
document, as it will be republished, it certainly not the original test
from June 1994.
>Thanks for all your work, Charles.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6MHTPKd053047 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:29:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6MHTP95053046; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:29:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from 2.mail-out.ovh.net (2.mail-out.ovh.net [91.121.26.226]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n6MHTDH0053033 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:29:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from julien@trigofacile.com)
Received: (qmail 22147 invoked by uid 503); 22 Jul 2009 19:10:51 -0000
Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail177.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 2.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 19:10:51 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 17:37:47 -0000
Received: from aaubervilliers-151-1-49-98.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO Iulius) (julien%trigofacile.com@83.114.131.98) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 17:37:46 -0000
Message-ID: <0C8DE6FE57CF4FF9AEF423A2C16AE15B@Iulius>
From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?=
To: "Usefor WG"
References:
In-Reply-To:
Subject: Re: Son-of-1036
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:29:04 +0200
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 5650328684239388089
X-Ovh-Remote: 83.114.131.98 (aaubervilliers-151-1-49-98.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Hi Charles,
> The RFC Editor is proceeding with the draft I submitted in May. It will be
> a Historic RFC as we had asked, but they want a line below that to state
> that it is "Superseded by RFC5536 and RFC5537" (that is in addition to the
> clear warnings in the Abstract and in the Preface to the effect that the
> document is NOT to be considered as a basis for current implementations).
Does it also imply that RFC 5536 and RFC 5537 will mention that they
update that RFC when dislpayed on ?
(just above "Category: Standards Track")
> Is there anything else that might cause confusion and that should be
> warned against?
Shouldn't the date "3 May 2009" be changed to "2 June 1994"? (and the sentence
"This document is identical to the last distributed version of Son of 1036,
dated 2 June 1994, except for reformatting" rewritten to say it was submitted
on May, 3rd 2009)
That date would highlight more the fact it is an *old* RFC.
It is just a suggestion; maybe it is impossible to change that date.
Thanks for all your work, Charles.
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Hâte-toi de bien vivre et songe que chaque jour
est à lui seul une vie. » (Sénèque)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6MGCX1u046814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:12:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6MGCXjJ046813; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:12:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from v-smtp-auth-relay-4.gradwell.net (v-smtp-auth-relay-4.gradwell.net [79.135.125.43]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6MGCLKC046792 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:12:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from news@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Received: from [80.175.135.89] ([80.175.135.89] helo=clerew.man.ac.uk country=GB ident=postmaster*pop3*clerew^man#ac^uk) by v-smtp-auth-relay-4.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.290) id 4a673a64.6ec3.133 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:12:20 +0100 (envelope-sender )
Received: from clerew.man.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n6MGC2Gj011430 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:12:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost) by clerew.man.ac.uk (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id n6MGC1ks011425 for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:12:01 +0100 (BST)
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Xref: clerew local.usefor:25119
Path: clerew!chl
From: "Charles Lindsey"
Subject: Son-of-1036
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.2 (NOV)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:58:34 GMT
Lines: 20
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
The RFC Editor is proceeding with the draft I submitted in May. It will be
a Historic RFC as we had asked, but they want a line below that to state
that it is "Superseded by RFC5536 and RFC5537" (that is in addition to the
clear warnings in the Abstract and in the Preface to the effect that the
document is NOT to be considered as a basis for current implementations).
They also asked for a mention that RFC822 is now replaced by 5532.
Is there anything else that might cause confusion and that should be
warned against?
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6CLFZaE012146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:15:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6CLFZOs012145; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:15:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6CLFX85012138 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:15:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from harald@alvestrand.no)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667C539E24F; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:15:33 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74rh4Uv51Slo; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:15:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.54] (162.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.162]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D5939E217; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:15:28 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4A5A5270.5060206@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:15:28 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russ Allbery
CC: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Subject: Re: Proposed changes for
References: <877hyoxe7c.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <877hyoxe7c.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Russ Allbery skrev:
> I think I received no feedback for this proposed diff other than
> agreement from Julien. Given that we're in AUTH48, in the absence of
> more consensus on the list that this is worth pushing at this phase, I'm
> not going to try to ask the RFC Editor to include it.
>
> So if you want me to push for this change, please speak up now.
>
I'd like to see this change.
> Index: usepro.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- usepro.xml (revision 5949)
> +++ usepro.xml (working copy)
> @@ -2022,14 +2022,24 @@
> the valid groups in all hierarchies or sub-hierarchies with a
> prefix listed in the <chkscope> argument, excluding any
> sub-hierarchy where the <chkscope> argument is prefixed by
> - "!". If no <chkscope> argument is given, it applies to all
> + "!". For complex cases with multiple <chkscope> arguments,
> + start from an empty list of groups, include all groups in the
> + checkgroups control message matching <chkscope> arguments
> + without a "!" prefix, and then exclude all groups matching
> + <chkscope> arguments with a "!" prefix. Follow this method
> + regardless of the order of the <chkscope> arguments in the
> + Control header field.
> +
> + If no <chkscope> argument is given, it applies to all
> hierarchies for which group statements appear in the body of the
> - message. Since much existing software does not honor the
> - <chkscope> argument, the body of the checkgroups control
> - message MUST NOT contain group statements for newsgroups outside
> - the intended scope and SHOULD contain a correct newsgroup list
> - even for sub-hierarchies excluded with "!" <chkscope> terms.
> - News servers, however, MUST honor <chkscope> as specified
> + message.
> +
> + Since much existing software does not honor the <chkscope>
> + argument, the body of the checkgroups control message MUST NOT
> + contain group statements for newsgroups outside the intended
> + scope and SHOULD contain a correct newsgroup list even for
> + sub-hierarchies excluded with "!" <chkscope> terms. News
> + servers, however, MUST honor <chkscope> as specified
> here.
>
> The <chksernr> argument may be any positive integer. If
>
>
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n659QFsF054384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:26:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n659QFRY054383; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:26:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n659QDxg054375 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:26:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from julien@trigofacile.com)
Received: (qmail 3790 invoked by uid 503); 5 Jul 2009 09:26:13 -0000
Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail435.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:26:13 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:26:13 -0000
Received: from aaubervilliers-151-1-15-95.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO Iulius) (julien%trigofacile.com@83.114.14.95) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:26:12 -0000
Message-ID:
From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?=
To: "Usefor WG"
References:
In-Reply-To:
Subject: Re: USEAGE referenced for Archive
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:26:08 +0200
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 8193173622452583865
X-Ovh-Remote: 83.114.14.95 (aaubervilliers-151-1-15-95.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.5/N
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Hi Charles,
> The following text was planned for useage-02. Maybe I will even get around
> to useage-02 :-).
OK, thanks for the pointer.
I transmitted the information to Xavier Roche and for his NoCeM notices
sent to news.lists.filters (and soon to fr.usenet.abus.nocem -- that's
for it we needed the information to mention the headers in the charter),
he now uses both of them:
X-No-Archive: Yes
Archive: No
It will maybe take a long time before switching to only the Archive: header...
--
Julien ÉLIE
« -- Par Thor !
-- Par Odin !
-- Par exemple ! » (Astérix)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n659JxQv054142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:19:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n659Jxr7054141; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:19:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n659JlW8054128 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:19:58 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from julien@trigofacile.com)
Received: (qmail 14573 invoked by uid 503); 5 Jul 2009 09:19:45 -0000
Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail435.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:19:45 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:19:45 -0000
Received: from aaubervilliers-151-1-15-95.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO Iulius) (julien%trigofacile.com@83.114.14.95) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 09:19:43 -0000
Message-ID: <066F71B63D1A42D8A51A099378A196F2@Iulius>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?=
To:
References: <877hyoxe7c.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <877hyoxe7c.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Proposed changes for
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:19:39 +0200
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 8083679858036571577
X-Ovh-Remote: 83.114.14.95 (aaubervilliers-151-1-15-95.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.5/N
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
Hi all,
> I think I received no feedback for this proposed diff other than
> agreement from Julien.
Harald was also in favour of a diff (but it was before you actually
wrote it):
http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/msg04638.html
"It seems to me that since we're incompatible with something
people will also know about (wildmat), flagging the
incompatibility is important."
> Given that we're in AUTH48, in the absence of
> more consensus on the list that this is worth pushing at this phase, I'm
> not going to try to ask the RFC Editor to include it.
Please note that if this diff is not in USEPRO, it will lead to various
incompatible implementations of checkgroups processing, like this one
we have already seen on news.software.nntp:
"When one expression describes a subset of another expression in an
opposite manner (inclusion vs. exclusion), an order of processing is
necessary to resolve the conflicting directives.
Given: a, a.b, a.b.c, a.b.c.d
In the order "a !a.b a.b.c !a.b.c.d", natural left-to-right processing is
the same as superset-subset order, so what results is that we include "all
of a not in a.b except all of a.b.c not in a.b.c.d".
However, let's make the order: "!a.b.c.d a.b.c !a.b a". Processing
superset-subset order will result as above, but left-to right will result
as "include all of a" and the other three expressions are rendered
meaningless. The syntax may not care. The semantics of order processing
DOES care.
Exclusion lacks the commutative property; order matters. If the elements
may appear in any syntactic order, the order of application of their use
must be defined, else different answers can ensue. We should not have
ambiguous results."
> + For complex cases with multiple <chkscope> arguments,
> + start from an empty list of groups, include all groups in the
> + checkgroups control message matching <chkscope> arguments
> + without a "!" prefix, and then exclude all groups matching
> + <chkscope> arguments with a "!" prefix. Follow this method
> + regardless of the order of the <chkscope> arguments in the
> + Control header field.
That solves the issue.
--
Julien ÉLIE
« There's a way of transferring funds that is even faster
than electronic banking. It's called marriage. » (Sam Kinison)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n64Mgh2W024491 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n64MggGM024490; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu (smtp3.Stanford.EDU [171.67.219.83]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n64MgV4G024476 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from eagle@windlord.stanford.edu)
Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 731EE1A045E for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.67.225.134]) by smtp3.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461131A045A for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 05B972F566; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Subject: Proposed changes for
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
From: Russ Allbery
Organization: The Eyrie
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:42:31 -0700
Message-ID: <877hyoxe7c.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-ID:
I think I received no feedback for this proposed diff other than
agreement from Julien. Given that we're in AUTH48, in the absence of
more consensus on the list that this is worth pushing at this phase, I'm
not going to try to ask the RFC Editor to include it.
So if you want me to push for this change, please speak up now.
Index: usepro.xml
===================================================================
--- usepro.xml (revision 5949)
+++ usepro.xml (working copy)
@@ -2022,14 +2022,24 @@
the valid groups in all hierarchies or sub-hierarchies with a
prefix listed in the <chkscope> argument, excluding any
sub-hierarchy where the <chkscope> argument is prefixed by
- "!". If no <chkscope> argument is given, it applies to all
+ "!". For complex cases with multiple <chkscope> arguments,
+ start from an empty list of groups, include all groups in the
+ checkgroups control message matching <chkscope> arguments
+ without a "!" prefix, and then exclude all groups matching
+ <chkscope> arguments with a "!" prefix. Follow this method
+ regardless of the order of the <chkscope> arguments in the
+ Control header field.
+
+ If no <chkscope> argument is given, it applies to all
hierarchies for which group statements appear in the body of the
- message. Since much existing software does not honor the
- <chkscope> argument, the body of the checkgroups control
- message MUST NOT contain group statements for newsgroups outside
- the intended scope and SHOULD contain a correct newsgroup list
- even for sub-hierarchies excluded with "!" <chkscope> terms.
- News servers, however, MUST honor <chkscope> as specified
+ message.
+
+ Since much existing software does not honor the <chkscope>
+ argument, the body of the checkgroups control message MUST NOT
+ contain group statements for newsgroups outside the intended
+ scope and SHOULD contain a correct newsgroup list even for
+ sub-hierarchies excluded with "!" <chkscope> terms. News
+ servers, however, MUST honor <chkscope> as specified
here.
The <chksernr> argument may be any positive integer. If
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)