IETF TRADE Draft Minutes 18 November 2002, Atlanta, Georgia Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, Chair -Agenda Bashing No change from agenda distributed in advance. -Document Status The status of the RFCs produced, 5 IESG approved drafts, and 4 draft currently in the working group was reviewed. The IESG approved drafts were all approved quite recently. -ECML V2 Specification ECML v1 and v1.1 were produced before the working group took change control for ECML and have been published as Informational RFCs. The ECML V2 requirements have been approved by the IESG and will be published as an Informational RFC. The V2 specification is almost ready for working group last call. The minor changes made in the last three draft versions (-03, -04, and -05) were reviewed. One field that should have been added (Ecom_Loyalty_Card_Type) and will be added to produce a -06 draft that will be working group last called. -IOTP Use of DNS SRV RR The motivation for draft-ietf-trade-srv-higher-services-00.txt was described. It permits declaration within the DNS of where to go for higher level services the way that SRV (RFC 2782) and MX do for lower level services. While it reserves the token "IOTP" for the use of IOTP, an additional small IOTP document is required to specify how to use and extend this token for the iotp-merchant, iotp-payment, iotp-delivery, and iotp-care roles. -XML Voucher Update The voucher requirements document has been approved by the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC. The Voucher Language and Voucher Transfer System API documents, by Ko Fujimura, who was unable to make it to this IETF meeting, are being refined by the Working Group. There is some indication of adoption of voucher in the Infrared Data Association. NTT has developed a C version of the API but the working group members present did not seem to think it was important for it to be published. -SCCD and IOTP V2 Two work items are overdue. They are Secure Channel Credit Debit and IOTP version 2. We do not have a draft for either and need authors. Anyone willing to work on this should contact the WG chair. SCCD, if done based on ECML, should be a medium-small size task. IOTP V2 is a large task but could be broken up into pieces. If no one is willing to do the documents, they won't happen. It is expected that the next WG meeting will be at the IETF meeting in San Francisco, March 2003.