For completeness in the gen-art archives and so that Jari doesn't have to go looking: (boilerplate elided) Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard On 8/4/15 1:43 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: (apologies to the genart list who will see this as a duplicate): I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-hansen-scram-sha256 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 04-Aug-2015 IETF LC End Date: 25-Aug-2015 IESG Telechat date: not yet on any telechat Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard The change to PS addresses the concern I expressed in the review below. miniscule-nit: I still think the extra URI section after the references is not needed. RjS On 4/2/15 1:41 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-hansen-scram-sha256 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2Apr2015 IETF LC End Date: 24Apr2015 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: Ready for publication as Informational, with nits that should be considered. Nits/editorial comments: Nit: It raises flags for me when an Informational document uses "Updates" on a standards track document. I would argue that this does _not_ update 5802. IANA did the things that 5802 requested, and this document is requesting something else that happens to change those things. That makes this more of a "see also" than a "the protocol changed", and I think the Updates should be removed. I don't feel super strongly about the difference in _this particular case_, hence its classification as a Nit. But for consistency, and avoiding the issue of having an Informational update a PS, I hope you choose to remove it. Editorial comment: The URLs in the references section seem superfluous since you've already expanded them in the introduction? _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art