Hello

I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-foo-name/

The routing directorate will, on request from the working group chair, perform an “early” review of a draft before it is submitted for publication to the IESG. The early review can be performed at any time during the draft’s lifetime as a working group document. The purpose of the early review depends on the stage that the document has reached.

<case 1> As this document has recently been adopted by the working group, my focus for the review is on providing a new perspective on the work, with the intention of catching any issues early on in the document's life cycle.

<case 2> As this document is in working group last call, my focus for the review was to determine whether the document is ready to be published. Please consider my comments along with the other working group last call comments.

<case 3> If neither of the above describes the circumstances of the review, then write a brief summary of the reasons for and purpose of the review here (get this from the WG chair if you are not sure).

For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir

Document: draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-03.txt
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 18-July-2023
Intended Status: Proposed Standard

Summary:
    This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be considered prior to being submitted to the IESG.

Major Issues: N/A

Minor Issues: N/A

Nits:
    In section 3.2 when describing the procedure, the paragraph about sending the Hello which contains the IHU says it it must contain the sender's timestamp.  It does not name that timestamp R2'.  The next paragraph refers to the timestamp as R2' (for good reason.)  Please put the naming in the earlier paragraph.