I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: Apr-26-2013 IETF LC End Date: May-06-2013 IESG Telechat date: May-30-2013 This document is ready as an Informational. A couple of minor comments that can benefit the draft below. Major: 0 Minor: 2 Nits: 0 Minor: - S1, 4th paragraph: "An IMIX suited for one networking device and deployment will not be appropriate for another." I suspect the variability of the packet sizes has to do with the vendor whose device is being benchmarked. In other words, a constant, K, used as a packet size by Vendor A does not mean that K can be used while benchmarking a device by Vendor B. If so, it may be helpful to augment the quoted sentence above by the phrase "because packet sizes differ across different vendor devices." - S3, "o Non-RFC2544 packet sizes ... in the table." --- Is this not already covered in S4 (Custom IMIX)? When I read the quoted bullet item, I immediately thought of some sort of an encoding scheme to encode non standard packet sizes, which is what S4 does. Maybe I am missing something? Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) Email: vkg at {bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani at alcatel-lucent.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq