Dear all,




 




I have reviewed this document as part of the operations directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operation
 area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.




 




** Technical **




 




* Abstract:




I think the abstract should note the new ctypes that are specified in this document, and what these c-types are used for.




 




* Section 4.1:




 




This section should clearly state that m should be interpreted as an unsigned integer.




 




* Section 4.1:




 




This section should clearly state that m should be interpreted as an unsigned integer.




 




 




* Section 5.1, page 8:




>    IANA is requested to assign the same value for TBD1 and TBD2, and a





>    value of 8 is suggested.  




 




Why do you suggest the value "8"?




 




 




 




** Editorial **




 




* Abstract:




 




>    This memo describes the extensions to the Resource reserVation





>    Protocol Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) signaling protocol to support





>    Label Switched Paths (LSPs) in a GMPLS-controlled network that





>    includes devices using the flexible optical grid. 





 




s/Resource/ReSource/.




  




 




Thank you,




Tina