This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. This document describes a YANG model for Detnet nodes and layers, addressing configuration and monitoring of the different entities. The Detnet YANG model has limited extra bearing on transport (beyond what Detnet already does): the model just allows accessing and controlling Detnet nodes, the protocols for doing are also separately specified. With this, assuming that the underlying Detnet mechanisms function properly, the YANG model should not be able to introduce additional transport layer issues that would need to be considered. Detnet also defines its own flow specification for traffic description. Detnet itself resides below the transport layer and may use service differentiation by various means so that the traffic inside a Detnet class is separated from that on the outside, but this should not affect the various traffic flows within a given class. Again, the YANG model only assists configuration. I trust the YANG expert reviews on the details of the model, which seem to have been discussed before. Nits: One may argue if section 4 could offer a bit more context; but, then, one may expect that those who would read this document would be intimately familiar with the Detnet architecture and terminology in the first place. If more stand-alone usage was intended, section 4 could be expanded a bit. The draft ,misses quite a few articles "the" in front of nouns, quite prominently in the last bullet list in the beginning of each bullet item, but also occasionally in other places. So, nothing major, but I wanted to still point out these two bits.