I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2020-12-12
IETF LC End Date: 2020-12-14
IESG Telechat date: 2020-12-17

Summary: The document is ready for publication with nits as a standard track RFC

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
1. first sentence in section  3.5 "If the client loses information about a prefix that it is delegated ..." not clear "it is"
2. section 7 "This document does not add any new security considerations beyond those mentioned in Section 22 of [RFC8213]." RFC8213 does not have section 22 , did you mean of RFC8415?

3.  In section 7 are there any security requirements for the operational interface requirements from section 4.4?