I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-messagelimit-08 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 2024-03-08 IETF LC End Date: 2024-03-25 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major Concerns: None Minor Concerns: This document contains the disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work. Is this because it builds upon the capability defined in RFC 3501? If so, then you can ignore this concern. If it is something else, then I would like to see a rationale in the document, even if it is put in a place that will not be part of the final RFC. Nits: IDnits reports: ** There are 13 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest one being 23 characters in excess of 72. At lease one of these long lines was a problem for me as a reader. I suspect that all of the long lines are in the C:/S: examples. I do not see the point of an Index at the back of the document that only has one entry.