From the draft: This document defines DHCPv6 options so an Homenet Naming Authority (HNA) can automatically proceed to the appropriate configuration and outsource the authoritative naming service for the home network. In most cases, the outsourcing mechanism is transparent for the end user. The document describes how a network can provision the HNA with a specific DOI. This could be particularly useful for a DOI partly managed by an ISP, or to make home networks resilient to HNA replacement. The ISP delegates an IP prefix to the home network as well as the associated reverse zone. It appears that the document accomplishes these goals (although I'm not an expert in homenet topics). The Shepherd's form says that this and a companion draft are the last items to complete before closing homenet (interest is waning). The protocol details seem to be well-considered. It appears that the Scenarios were moved to Appendices, rather than as normative section and subsections: Appendix A. Scenarios and impact on the End User This *section* details various scenarios and discuss their impact on the end user. This section is not normative and limits the description of a limited scope of scenarios that are assumed to be representative. Many other scenarios may be derived from these. s/section/Appendix/g and other fixes.