I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at


http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq

.





 




Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.




 




Document: draft-ietf-isis-fs-lsp-01




Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour




Review Date: 2014-06-02




IETF LC End Date:   2014-06-03




IESG Telechat date: 2014-06-12




 




 




Summary:




This draft is ready to be published as Standard RFC but I have some editorial comments.




 




 




Nits/editorial comments:




-[Page 5], Section 2, typo , "identifes"-->"identifies"




-[Pages 8, 10, 12],  typo: "sub-TLVss"----->"sub-TLVs"




-[page 6] section 2.2, an example would be useful for:




"




o  The eight bit type is encoded as an unsigned 16 bit integer




o  The eight bit length field is replaced by the 16 bit length field




"




-[Page 14], Section 5 the sentence could be more readable with the suggested change:




old:




"




Even when all routers in a given scope support FS PDUs, if not all routers in




   the flooding domain for a given scope support that scope flooding of




   the FS-LSPs may be compromised.




"




suggested:(added ", then")




"




Even when all routers in a given scope support FS PDUs, if not all routers in




   the flooding domain for a given scope support that scope, then flooding of




   the FS-LSPs may be compromised.




"




-Suggestion, when reference to [IS-IS] is made, it would be very useful to point to the right section as well, when possible.




 




 




Best Regards,




Meral




---




Meral Shirazipour




Ericsson




Research




www.ericsson.com