I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-03.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20141025 IETF LC End Date: 20141027 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - ToC page 2 and 5 page 18: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments - 3.2.6 page 8: singaling -> signaling - 3.3.1 page 9: e.g. -> e.g., - 3.3.2.4.1 pages 11 and 12: the conclusion (Gap: None) doesn't seem very in phase with the text. Perhaps it is another case of "out of scope known gap"? - 3.4.2 page 15 (UK vs US spelling): behaviour -> behavior - 4 page 17: Identifed -> Identified - 6 pages 18 and 19, Authors' Addresses page 26: I don't like ISO IS 3166 two letter codes used in postal addresses but it seems to be what the new RFC required... Regards Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr PS: I reviewed the 02 version but now the 03 was published so I updated my comments. rfcdiff shows 03 is better than 02 at the exception of: - in 3.3.1.1 page 9 perhaps a missing '<' as I can see: ... (see xref target="LDP"/>). PPS: it could be useful to have a checklist of all RFCs which should be updated but it is more a task for the WG than something to put in the document (I don't follow the WG so I don't know if it already exists :-).