I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-payload-vp8-17.txt Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review Date: 2015/09/11 IETF 2nd LC End Date: 2015/07/13 IESG Telechat date: 2015/09/17 Summary: Ready with minor nits. Thanks for addressing nearly all my comments from the 2nd LC review. The remaining two points are noted below. THere is also a point made elsewhere about the Media Type Definition. Major issues: None. Minor issues: s4.2: The consequences of not starting PictureID and/or TL0PICIDX at random values (and/or the rationale for starting at random values) is not discussed. Nits/editorial comments: s4.2: I still consider it undesirable to have two pairs of bit fields with the same name (X and M). Flagging that they are duplicates helps a bit but where the values are referred to elsewhere ambiguity remains about which of the fields is implied. s6.1: These parameters are used to signal the capabilities of a receiver implementation. If the implementation is willing to receive media, both parameters MUST be provided. These parameters MUST NOT be used for any other purpose. The latter two sentences would be better placed in s.6.