Reviewer: Martin Vigoureux Review result: Ready Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity Reviewer: Martin Vigoureux Review Date: 2022-04-13 Telechat Date: 2022-04-14 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: No major issues found. This document is ready for publication. Comments: The document sometimes uses "owner" when referring to the entity which has the INRs. I wonder whether this is intentional, and if not, whether using "holder" (as done in other places of the document) would be more appropriate. The RPKI's strong authority over ownership of INRs has misled some people toward a desire to use RPKI private keys to sign arbitrary documents attesting that the INR 'owner' of those resources has attested to the authenticity of the document content. I found the double use of attesting/has attested confusing, but that may only be me parsing this incorrectly.