I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-nd-cache-init-10
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2020-09-03
IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-04
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The purpose of the GENART review is to provide a fresh pair of eyes not familiar with the work. I am sure that those that deal with the detail of IPv6 day to day will completely understand this on the first pass, but for those not familiar some attention to the abbreviations is needed. Also the Abstract and Intro do not seem to this first time reader to align with the purpose of the text.

Major issues:
As far as I can see there is a preferred solution documented in I-D.ietf-6man-grand, and this text documents the problem and the rejected alternatives, but that does not come through in reading the abstract or introduction.

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

SB> There is a problem I that the introduction uses a number of terms which are not well known to the wider IETF community, and which are not defined until later in the text : SLAAC, GUA, DAD.
SB> The term LLA is not defined here or by the RFC editor. 
SB> SLLAO? Needs expanding
=====
   o  Some wireless devices are known to fiddle with
SB> an unusual technical term
=====
   o  Data packets to the router LLA
SB> LLA? Not in the editors list and not defined as far as I can see,