I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:  draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2014–10-23 IETF LC End Date: 2014–10-30 IESG Telechat date:   Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP RFC .     Major issues:   Minor issues:   Section 2.3 discusses the issue of defining appropriate registration policy. I was wondering about consistency between the policies of similar registries, is it important and how to verify it. For example the policy for http://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-security-descriptions/sdp-security-descriptions.xhtml#sdp-security-descriptions-3 is standard action and for http://www.iana.org/assignments/srtp-protection/srtp-protection.xhtml#srtp-protection-1 is specification required. I think that such cases should be discussed when defining the registration policy.    Nits/editorial comments: In section 2.3 “judgement” should be “judgment”