I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-?? Reviewer: Erik Kline Review Date: 2019-02-05 IETF LC End Date: 2019-02-05 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Seems generally ready to go, but I have a few questions. I apologize if these don't many any sense in the proper context of this document. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: [1] I assume the URIs in 6.3 are also meant to be deleted upon publication? [2] WRT to the final lines of 5.1: [a] "Replace all references to RFC 5988 in that registry have been replaced..." doesn't scan well, I think. [b] If the IANA repo in question is https://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xhtml, I don't see any mention of 5988 in there. [3] Naive question: do we want a statement about reserving/agreeing to never allocate "example" in the .well-known space?