I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at   Document:                    draft-templin-intarea-seal-51.txt   Reviewer:                     Christer Holmberg   Review Date:                 19 Feb 2013   IETF LC End Date:        20 Feb 2013   IETF Telechat Date:       21 Feb 2013   Summary:  The draft is well written, but with some editorial comments that I suggest to be addressed before publication. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None   Editorial nits: See below   Q_ED_1: Most of the text in the Abstract section does not belong there. The section should talk about what the document does, and not define what a subnetwork is etc. Only the last sentence talks about what the draft is about.   Q_ED_2: In the Introduction section, I would suggest to add a reference for IP encapsulating/tunneling. RFC 2003 is referenced later in the document, but I think it would be good to have something also in the Introduction.   Q_ED_3: In section 1.2, do you need to define ‘subnetwork’ here? Isn’t it better to have the definition in one single place – the Terminology section?   Q_ED_4: In section 12, there seems to be a dot too much J   Best regards,   Christer