Re: Trial Shows How Spammers Operate |
---|
Robert Bonomi (bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com) Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:14:52 +0000
|
|
In article <telecom23.559.11@telecom-digest.org>, Dan Lanciani <ddl@danlan.com> wrote:
> Obviously. But why should I care? The point of the response is to
Suppose *your* email address got forged as the sender on spam that
Guess what happens to _your_ mailbox.
But, "why should those people care?" *You* don't care about being
If all the spam had *invalid* addresses addresses, it wouldn't be an
You *are* spamming _their_ mailbox.
>> Occasionally I see messages like that and they are treated
> That works only if you have time to look at all the messages. I
>> Since spammers never use a real From: address replying by mail is
> It is extremely useful for my purposes; it just may not happen to also
Yeah. you mail-bomb *innocent* parties who's address was used
> My machine doesn't look like a relay and they are not trying to use it
It's called a 'dictionary' attack. Just one more way of trying to |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Robert Bonomi: "Re: Movie Studios to Sue Internet File Traders" | |
Go to Previous message: Joseph: "Re: Couple of Basic Cellular Questions" | |
May be in reply to: Monty Solomon: "Trial Shows How Spammers Operate" | |
Next in thread: Dan Lanciani: "Re: Trial Shows How Spammers Operate" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |