Re: USATODAY.com - Airborne Cell-Phone Ban Likely to Remain |
---|
Marcus Didius Falco (falco_marcus_didius@yahoo.co.uk) Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:50:39 -0500
|
|
AES/newspost <siegman@stanford.edu> wrote regarding Re: USATODAY.com Airborne Cell-Phone Ban Likely to Remain For Now on Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:05:25 -0800:
> In article <telecom23.596.1@telecom-digest.org>, Marcus Didius Falco
>> Airlines, rival wireless companies and aircraft maker Boeing are
>> "Today the high cost of wireless when flying has kept the users low,"
>> Kagan, who does a lot of traveling, said he loves and hates the idea
>> "We should be very careful before opening this up," he said. "Just
> I've read news stories in the past about cellphone jammers or blockers
> Anyone have any leads on portable, battery-powered versions?
Illegal in the US and Canada. There will probably be MAJOR penalties
There are reports that some hotels have been importing them from |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Steve Sobol: "Re: USATODAY.com - Airborne Cell-Phone Ban Likely to Remain For Now" | |
Go to Previous message: Clark W. Griswold, Jr.: "Re: USATODAY.com - Airborne Cell-Phone Ban Likely to Remain For Now" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |