Re: Don't Allow Under-9s to Use a Mobile |
---|
Linc Madison (lincmad@suespammers.org) Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:04:54 -0800
|
|
In article <telecom24.31.6@telecom-digest.org>, Fred Atkinson <fatkinson@mishmash.com> wrote:
> Nor was mine. I didn't imply any conclusion. But, who's to say what
NO, IT ISN'T. The jury is absolutely back in, and it is NOT a problem.
> What reliable research has been done to determine whether or not
Wrong. It is CATEGORICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for radiation from a cellphone
> When I hear a cell phone salesperson say there's no danger, he has no
No, in fact there is a substantial basis for saying that, because there
> So when you hear telecommunications people saying there's nothing
That's only true if the person speaking has a financial interest. I
The only effect that microwaves (the wavelength used by cellphones)
I am also always amazed by people who are concerned about cellphones
The radiation from a cellphone CANNOT cause cancer. It's not extremely
Linc Madison * San Francisco, California * lincmad@suespammers.org |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Robert Bonomi: "Re: Don't Allow Under-9s to Use a Mobile" | |
Go to Previous message: Jack Decker: "Powell To Leave FCC In March" | |
May be in reply to: Marcus Didius Falco: "Don't Allow Under-9s to Use a Mobile" | |
Next in thread: Robert Bonomi: "Re: Don't Allow Under-9s to Use a Mobile" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |