Re: AT&T Hangs Up - and Few Are Sorry to Say Goodbye |
---|
hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com 4 Feb 2005 10:53:40 -0800
|
|
RamaChandra Raju Bhupathiraju wrote:
> Tue Feb 1, 6:31 AM ET Op/Ed - USATODAY.com
> ... It was an overbearing monopoly before its breakup ...
No it was not. It's monopoly status did not result from anything
> Not since its early days has it been much of an innovator.
Most of our present day communication system owes itself to
> For much of its history, AT&T was the quintessential monopoly. It
Not exactly true. Customers DID have choices in using telegrams for
> AT&T was once, arguably, the USA's most powerful company.
It was a powerful company, but not necessarily the country's "most" |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: TELECOM Digest Editor: "TD-Extra Site Map" | |
Go to Previous message: Isaiah Beard: "Re: Comcast Exceeds One Million HDTV-Capable Set-Top Boxes" | |
May be in reply to: RamaChandra Raju Bhupathiraju: "AT&T Hangs Up - and Few Are Sorry to Say Goodbye" | |
Next in thread: Tony P.: "Re: AT&T Hangs Up - and Few Are Sorry to Say Goodbye" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |