Re: Arbitration Left ID Theft Victim With $27,000 Bill |
---|
Rich Greenberg (richgr@panix.com) Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:39:12 +0000 (UTC)
|
|
In article <telecom24.88.9@telecom-digest.org>, Carl Navarro <cnavarro@wcnet.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:37:02 -0500, Marcus Didius Falco
>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48753-2005Feb23.html
>>> By Caroline E. Mayer
>>> Yes, I thought your liability from a 'stolen' card (which this
>> Only if you notify them within 24 or 48 hours. She didn't notify them for
> What was she thinking? She should have known that someone stole her
> Oh, maybe she wasn't a psychic afer all ...
Part of the problem was that someone claiming to be her sister called
The last time I changed the billing address for a CC, they sent a letter
Rich Greenberg Marietta, GA, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 770 321 6507 |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Dave VanHorn: "Re: Ring Tone Surprise" | |
Go to Previous message: Fritz Whittington: "Re: Shut The Cell Up New York Post Online Edition: news" | |
May be in reply to: Marcus Didius Falco: "Arbitration Left ID Theft Victim With $27,000 Bill" | |
Next in thread: Marcus Didius Falco: "Re: Arbitration Left ID Theft Victim With $27,000 Bill" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |