Re: Voom Goes Boom |
---|
Mark Crispin (MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU) Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:35:57 -0800
|
|
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, J Kelly wrote:
> I keep hearing a vocal minority whining about not enough HDTV
Voom's service started out with a hefty (several hundred dollars)
Voom did not carry any local channels; you had to have a separate OTA
Voom didn't carry very many of the popular cable/satellite channels. Voom
Voom was not a good choice for people with multiple sets, or for people
When Voom cut their prices, they did so to the extent that clearly
Bottom line: high prices, inferior choices compared to other satellite
-- Mark --
http://staff.washington.edu/mrc |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Dean: "Re: Vonage's Citron Says VoIP Blocking Is 'Censorship'" | |
Go to Previous message: Telecom dailyLead from USTA: "March 3, 2005 - Telecom executives tout benefits of mergers" | |
May be in reply to: J Kelly: "Voom Goes Boom" | |
Next in thread: J Kelly: "Re: Voom Goes Boom" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |