From the CyberLaw list
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:20:58 CST
From: Andrew Odlyzko
Subject: FYI: paper about Metcalfe's Law
Dear Colleagues,
Sorry for the spam, but I thought you might be interested in the
paper described below. Comments are invited.
Andrew
A refutation of Metcalfe's Law
and a better estimate for the value
of networks and network interconnections
Andrew Odlyzko
Digital Technology Center
University of Minnesota
Benjamin Tilly
Abstract
Metcalfe's Law states that the value of a communications network is
proportional to the square of the size of the network. It is widely
accepted and frequently cited. However, there are several arguments
that this rule is a significant overestimate. (Therefore Reed's Law
is even more of an overestimate, since it says that the value of a
network grows exponentially, in the mathematical sense, in network
size.) This note presents several quantitative arguments that suggest
the value of a general communication network of size n grows like
n*log(n). This growth rate is faster than the linear growth, of order
n, that, according to Sarnoff's Law, governs the value of a broadcast
network. On the other hand, it is much slower than the quadratic
growth of Metcalfe's Law, and helps explain the failure of the dot-com
and telecom booms, as well as why network interconnection (such as
peering on the Internet) remains a controversial issue.
FULL PAPER AT:
http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/metcalfe.pdf
NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily
media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra . Hundreds of new articles daily.
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance, Andrew Odlyzko.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml