Re: Vonage Outage Last Thursday, was: Vonage |
---|
Tim@Backhome.org Wed, 09 Mar 2005 05:58:29 -0800
|
|
Tony P. wrote:
> In article <telecom24.101.10@telecom-digest.org>, Tim@Backhome.org
>> Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>>> In article <telecom24.99.4@telecom-digest.org>, Danny Burstein
>>> Unfortunately, the actualy duration of the problem was several hours;
>>> No doubt about it. It caused major problems for me.
>>> If Vonage were a regulated entity -- which it's gone to great lengths
>> What this proves is that Vonage is simply not a viable replacement for
>> I figured it was all worth it for the unlimited, inexpensive "out
> I'd like to know what part of $88 you consider reasonable. That's what
Well, compared to long-distance bills I had of $1,100 per month in the
You are comparing Vonage's total cost with SBC's total cost. I guess
I have a critical conference call later this morning. I'll use my |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: John Levine: "Re: Vonage Outage Last Thursday, was: Vonage" | |
Go to Previous message: Randal Hayes: "Re: Vonage Outage Last Thursday" | |
May be in reply to: Danny Burstein: "Vonage Outage Last Thursday, was: Vonage" | |
Next in thread: John Levine: "Re: Vonage Outage Last Thursday, was: Vonage" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |