TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Apple Can Demand Names of Bloggers, Judge Says

Apple Can Demand Names of Bloggers, Judge Says

Monty Solomon (monty@roscom.com)
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:24:36 -0500

By LAURIE J. FLYNN

SAN FRANCISCO, March 11 - A California judge ruled Friday that Apple
Computer has the right to subpoena the names of sources and documents
relating to confidential company information that was published late
last year by three Web sites.

Judge James P. Kleinberg of the Santa Clara County Superior Court in
San Jose, Calif., said in a 13-page ruling that Apple's interest in
protecting its trade secrets outweighed the public's right to
information about Apple and the right of bloggers to disseminate that.

The ruling skirted the question of whether the Web sites were
protected by the same laws that protect professional journalists, as
civil liberties groups had argued, and focused on the notion that the
published information included trade secrets and was essentially
stolen property.

The ruling came in the three-month-old lawsuit brought by Apple
against the unnamed individuals, presumably Apple employees, who
reportedly leaked information about new music software, code-named
Asteroid, which the company said constituted a trade secret. Under
California law, divulging trade secrets is subject to civil and
criminal penalties.

That information was published on three Apple enthusiast Web sites,
Apple Insider, Think Secret and PowerPage. The Web sites were not
named in the suit.

In the course of discovery, Apple served a subpoena on Nfox.com, the
e-mail service provider for PowerPage, seeking information and
documents that might identify the source of the disclosure of Apple's
new product. The Web sites sought to block that subpoena.

The case has been closely watched for its potential impact on the
publishers of Web sites and bloggers, who say the privilege of reporters
to protect their confidential sources should extend to online writers.

But Judge Kleinberg wrote that assuming Apple's accusations are true,
the information is "stolen property, just as any physical item, such
as a laptop computer containing the same information on its hard drive
(or not) would be."

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/12/technology/12blog.html?
hp&ex=1110603600&en=65f05a7ccf104a46&ei=5094

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: To read New York Times on line each day
with no login or registration requirements, read it here at our site
at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/nytimes.html . Hundreds of new
items each day. PAT]

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Monty Solomon: "EFFector 18.4: EFF Announces New Privacy Tool"
Go to Previous message: Monty Solomon: "GOP Party Head sentenced to Seven Months in Phone Jamming"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page