Re: Tangled up Over DSL - Some Cell Phone Users Demand to Stand |
---|
Don Bowey (dbowey@comcast.net) Wed, 25 May 2005 17:14:49 -0700
|
|
On 5/25/05 3:17 PM, in article telecom24.233.5@telecom-digest.org, William Warren <william_warren_nonoise@comcast.net> wrote:
> Jack Decker wrote:
>> http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/business/3195270
>> Some Cell Phone Users Demand to Stand Alone
>> By JOHN C. ROPER
>> A growing number of U.S. consumers are cutting the cord on traditional
>> But many of these consumers have found ditching their land-line phone
>> Providers such as SBC Communications require customers to buy
I'm sure the DSL price is based on there being a POTS line at the
Don
> The independents, such as Covad, have had to order and use separate
> Cross-subsidy and competition issues aside, the Bells are certainly
[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Well, SBC claimed to me that naked DSL |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: John R. Levine: "Re: VOIP Provider Search" | |
Go to Previous message: Monty Solomon: "Fatal Failure Halts Installation of 911 Caller-ID System" | |
May be in reply to: Jack Decker: "Tangled up Over DSL - Some Cell Phone Users Demand to Stand" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |