Re: First Place, Web Promotion, Unsolicited Calls? |
---|
Robert Bonomi (bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com) Thu, 26 May 2005 11:42:13 -0000
|
|
In article <telecom24.233.6@telecom-digest.org>, Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
> usenet@outshine.com wrote:
>> Has anyone recently received an unsolicited call from someone
> Yeah, feh ... can't remember which product First Place Software
> ... No, it looks like WPG was bought by WebTrends.
> Heh, but when I do a search on First Place Software, a sponsored link
>> Today I received an unsolicited call from them. The agent asked if I
>> I told him to put me on his do not call list. He REFUSED. I asked
> Idiots. Yup, WebTrends was the company that had a buggy log analysis
> WebTrends is at 851 SW 6th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204. If you were
If the marketing call came to his _cell_ phone, as he implies, then it is
47 USC 227 expressly forbids marketing calls to _any_ "telephone
The failure to provide Caller-ID info is also an express violation of
The refusal to add one, when requested, to their
As is the caller's refusal to identify himself -- and the company he
Complaints to the FCC _and_ the FTC are both in order. The FTC _can_
A private lawsuit (small-claims) for the 47 USC 227 violation is also |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: NOTvalid@XmasNYC.Info: "Re: First Place, Web Promotion, Unsolicited Calls?" | |
Go to Previous message: Telecom dailyLead from USTA: "Cell Phone Users Want Media Services" | |
May be in reply to: usenet@outshine.com: "First Place, Web Promotion, Unsolicited Calls?" | |
Next in thread: NOTvalid@XmasNYC.Info: "Re: First Place, Web Promotion, Unsolicited Calls?" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |