For your convenience in reading: Subject lines are printed in RED and
Moderator replies when issued appear in BROWN.
Previous Issue (just one)
TD Extra News
Add this Digest to your personal
or  
TELECOM Digest Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:08:00 EDT Volume 24 : Issue 348 Inside This Issue: Editor: Patrick A. Townson Internet Security Gets Injunction vs. Former Worker (Reuters NewsWire) Hackers Race to Expose Cisco Internet Flaw (Andy Sullivan) Cincinnati Bell Sets New Rules in Wireless Plan (James Pilcher) Internet Ad Pioneer Now Shunning Pop-Ups (Anick Desjanun) Web Audio Book Leader Faces Competition (Monty Solomon) Parking Meters Get Smarter (Monty Solomon) Information Security/Where the Threats Are (Monty Solomon) Re: E-911 Making Headway In VOIP (David) Re: Cell Phone For VOIP - Home Device Imitates Provider Signal (Bonomi) Re: Cell Phone For VOIP - Home Device Imitates Provider Signal (Levine) Re: Bell System and GTE Telephone Operator? (Steven Lichter) Re: Nextel False Advertising (John R. Levine) Re: Nextel False Advertising (Garrett Wollman) Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address- included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the email. =========================== Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome. We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. Geoffrey Welsh =========================== See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Internet Security Gets Injunction vs. Former Worker Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:57:00 -0500 A U.S. court ruling has barred a former Internet Security Systems employee from further disseminating research he has already disclosed on how computer hackers could undermine Internet equipment made by Cisco Systems that is vital to the operation of the Internet. The ruling by a U.S. District Court in San Francisco permanently bars former employee Michael Lynn and the Black Hat conference organization from disseminating, in any form, the presentation Lynn gave at the conference on Wednesday, Internet Security Systems Inc. said in a statement on Friday. Internet Security and San Jose, California-based Cisco, the biggest maker of gear used to direct traffic over the Internet, filed a joint request for the court injunction after Lynn gave the presentation. Lynn made the presentation after he had tendered his resignation to Internet Security. The conference, in Las Vegas, is a big gathering of computer security enthusiasts who mull the latest and greatest trends in tech security. The ruling forbids Lynn from making further use of, or disclosing, any of the research in the presentation that he conducted while employed by Internet Security, the company said. It said the information Lynn presented did not disclose a new vulnerability or flaw with Cisco Systems Inc.'s_(Nasdaq:CSCO - news) Internetwork Operating System software but was a description of ways to "expand exploitations of known security vulnerabilities" affecting Cisco's routers, which are vital to moving Internet traffic. Atlanta-based Internet Security Systems provides protection for these Cisco vulnerabilities. The companies were not immediately available to comment on whether Lynn's presentation had caused any increased efforts to undermine Cisco's equipment. Prior to the start of the conference, Lynn had informed the Black Hat organizers that he would not make a presentation at the show because Internet Security had determined that further research needed to be conducted on the topic to be presented, Internet Security said. Internet Security is known for its network intrusion prevention software that offers big companies in industries like banking and automotive protections to keep Internet menaces like viruses and spam from getting inside corporate networks. Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. ------------------------------ From: Andy Sullivan <reuters-newswire@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Hackers Race to Expose Cisco Internet Flaw Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:54:23 -0500 By Andy Sullivan Computer hackers worked through the weekend to expose a flaw that could allow an attacker to take control of the Cisco Systems Inc. Angered and inspired by Cisco's attempts to suppress news of the flaw earlier in the week, several computer security experts at the Defcon computer-security conference worked past midnight Saturday to discover and map out the vulnerability. "The reason we're doing this is because someone said you can't," said one hacker, who like the others spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity. Cisco's routers direct traffic across at least 60 percent of the Internet and the security hole has dominated a pair of conferences that draw thousands of security researchers, U.S. government employees and teenage troublemakers to Las Vegas each summer. The hackers said they had no intention of hijacking e-commerce payments, reading private e-mail, or launching any of the other malicious attacks that could be possible by exploiting the flaw. Rather, they said they wanted to illustrate the need for Cisco customers to update their software to defend against such possibilities. Many Cisco customers have postponed the difficult process because it could require them to unplug entirely from the Internet. Security researcher Michael Lynn first described the flaw on Wednesday at the Black Hat conference over the objections of Cisco and his former employer, Internet Security Systems Inc. Lynn helped Cisco develop a fix but wanted to discuss it publicly to raise awareness of the problem, according to associates, going so far as to quit his job with ISS so he could talk freely. "What (Lynn) ended up doing was describing how to build a missile without giving all the details. He gave enough (details) so people could understand how a missile could be built, and they could take their research from there," said a security expert who gave his name only as Simonsaz and who said he is not involved in the hacking effort. COURT ORDER After his presentation Cisco and ISS obtained a court order barring Lynn and the Black Hat organization from further disseminating details of the flaw. Cisco employees ripped Lynn's presentation from the conference program, according to witnesses, and Black Hat handed over its video recording of his talk. "ISS and Cisco's actions with Mr. Lynn and Black Hat were not based on the fact that a flaw was identified, rather that they chose to address the issue outside of established industry practices," said Cisco spokeswoman Mojgan Khalili, who added that the company is committed to protecting its customers. But those efforts have only inspired other security experts to take a crack at Cisco's software. "It's really saddening and disheartening to see Cisco taking this approach, because it leaves their customers less secure," one of the hackers said. In one of the hackers' hotel room, several Cisco routers sat surrounded by plastic beer cups on a coffee table. Two laptops on the floor displayed the software's source code, an endless blur of numbers. If they don't figure out how to take over Cisco's Internet Operating System software by the end of the weekend, their counterparts at a hacking festival in Europe will certainly do so, the hackers said. Some experts said the flaw has been blown out of proportion. Malevolent attackers are more likely to focus on easier targets such as home computers rather than the complex routers that direct traffic across the Internet, said Jon Callas, chief technical officer of PGP Corp., a provider of encryption software. "An awful lot of the buzz that is going around is buzz because of the use of lawyers and injunctions and lawsuits rather than the actual thing itself," said Callas, who is not involved in efforts to hack the software. Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. ------------------------------ From: James Pilcher <enquirer@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Cincinnati Bell Sets 'New Rules' in Wireless Plan Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:52:02 -0500 By James Pilcher, Enquirer staff writer New Plan: Cincinnati Bell will unveil Monday a new calling plan, allowing unlimited calls to and from any Bell wireless or land-line number within the local calling area. All the plans include no contract, nationwide roaming, unlimited mobile-to-mobile calls, domestic long distance, voice mail, caller ID, call waiting and unlimited incoming text messages. Activation fees apply; off peak hours are 9 p.m. to 6 a.m Monday-Friday and weekends. Here are the details (plans are also available for 1,000 peak minutes and 3,000 peak minutes): Plan Unlimited Bell calling Plus 500 Peak mins. Plus 1,500 peak mins. Monthly rate $39.99 $59.99* $99.99 Nights & Weekends unlimited Unlimited unlimited Add'l. minute charges 20 cents 40 cents 25 cents Add'l. users $25/mo. $10/mo.** $10/mo.** Max. no. of users 5 5 10 * offered at an introductory rate of $49.99 for the first 3 months ** or $25/mo. for a Cincinnati Bell calling user "In Network?" "Friends & Family?" Cincinnati Bell thinks it's beaten such calling programs. The area's main telephone company -- and market leader for cell phone customers -- Monday will unveil a network and pricing initiative that will allow wireless subscribers to call any Cincinnati Bell phone, either land-based or wireless, for one flat monthly fee. It is thought to be the first program of its kind in the country, because other regional telephone companies either don't not offer cell phone service or are too large to pull off such an initiative. "We are very uniquely positioned for this," said Bell's recently installed chief operating officer Rodney Dir. "How important is it for a customer to be able to call potentially up to 2 million other customers without having it charge against their wireless minutes?" The move is seen as a way for Bell not only to boost sagging wireless subscriptions, but also to further defend its primary franchise - its land-line business, which is under attack from cable companies and other providers using Internet-based technology for home phones. "The value of having a land line goes up immediately for people," said Andy Castonguay, senior analyst with The Yankee Group, a Boston-based the technology consulting and analysis firm. "It also helps their branding from a standpoint that it encourages people to understand Cincinnati Bell as a total entity offers a converged, simple, one-stop shop." The plan, dubbed "New Rules," calls for wireless customers to pay about $40 a month for access to the network. Then all calls to all Cincinnati Bell wireless and land-line phones are free, as long as they are made within the local calling area. Calls to customers of other cell phone providers or to land lines operated by someone other than Bell or outside of the local network would cost 20 cents a minute. Long distance and roaming remain free. But Dir said that customers could pay an additional $20 a month to get 500 out-of-network minutes, adding that the $60 overall plan could be the company's new "sweet spot." "Our (revenue per user) for wireless is about $46 today," Dir said. "This really could raise that, especially since we feel this takes the worry out of having to make sure you're not going over on your minutes." In addition, Bell is revamping its traditional plans for those customers who don't want the free-calling feature, lowering its price for a standard 500-minute plan to about $40, which Dir says offers more minutes for the money than two of its major competitors in the market, Verizon and Cingular. And its traditional plans will include options for up to 6,000 minutes a month, which will cost about $200 a month. "And believe me, there are customers out there who want that kind of plan," said Dir, who previously served as an Atlanta-based vice president for national retail sales and operations for wireless operator T-Mobile. Bell lost $3 million in the first quarter, with the wireless division reporting flat revenues. It also reported that 2.6 percent of its customers left for other carriers. Dir said that the effects of the new efforts probably won't be seen until the fourth quarter, but that the hope is that the new plans will help build Bell's wireless subscriber base, which in turn could mean more wireless revenue. But Castonguay said that the new network plan could keep customers from wanting to shut off their land lines and just use cell phones or change home service to other operators such as Time Warner. "It really capitalizes on that fixed-line network and makes it more valuable," he said. Program has risk to Bell The company already had introduced free calling between Bell wireless customers, matching programs such as Verizon's "In Network." Bell also has offered free calls to a specified home number from a Bell cell phone since late last year. The extra charge Bell is asking for out-of-network calls could be a risk, however. "It's difficult to know how customers will react for that jump from $40 to $60 for those extra 500 minutes, and that's a gamble," said Castonguay. "But on the flip side, it could be a big hit with their business enterprise customers as well." At the same time Bell is launching the "New Rules," the company is launching a marketing offensive touting its local wireless network as the best in Cincinnati. While saying that the new pricing and network plans as well as the new ad campaign were positive moves overall, Castonguay said there are concerns with setting expectations too high for customers. "Those can be difficult to manage, with people thinking their bill could be lower and then they call a bunch of out-of-network friends," he said. "This is true for all the national wireless guys with major plans. "Still, this changes the whole value proposition of a home phone line combined with a cell phone," he said. E-mail jpilcher@enquirer.com Copyright 2005, The Enquirer NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner, in this instance, Cincinnati Enquirer. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtm ------------------------------ From: Anick Jesdanun <ap@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Internet Ad Pioneer Now Shunning Pop-Ups Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:55:45 -0500 By ANICK JESDANUN, AP Internet Writer A pioneer of software that tailors pop-up ads to Internet users' browsing habits is beginning to shun a practice that has invited much derision and plenty of lawsuits. A new service Claria Corp. is launching this month will still deliver advertising to the computer desktops of Web surfers. Only this time, they won't be annoying pop-ups. So-called personalization -- targeting surfers with ads based on their online outings and errands -- was always Claria's goal, says its co-founder and chief executive, Jeff McFadden. Pop-ups delivered via adware, which is often criticized as sneaky in its installation, were merely a stepping stone as Claria waited for the technology to improve and the behavioral-targeting market to ripen, he said. "It was never a destination," McFadden told The Associated Press. "There's a lot of people who aren't fans of the pop-up model." Some might consider that an understatement from the head of a company whose name has become synonymous with adware, which many consider a cyberparasite or worse. Although Scott Eagle, Claria's director of marketing, said market forces ultimately drove the decision, he acknowledged the new strategy could help improve the image of a company that has bothered more than consumers. The New York Times Co. and L.L. Bean Inc. are among businesses that have sued Claria for delivering pop-up ads that they said subverted paid advertising or lured visitors to rivals. Claria even changed its name in 2003 from Gator Corp., though the company insists it wasn't a response to mounting criticism. "It is a little naive of them to believe they can introduce a product and have the sins of the past forgotten completely," said Jeff Lanctot, vice president of media at Avenue A/Razorfish, an ad-placement agency whose sister company makes behavioral-targeting technology that could compete with Claria's. "They have to be completely aboveboard and take extra steps other companies don't have to do to gain trust back," said Ari Schwartz, associate director with the Center for Democracy and Technology. Many of Claria's critics remain skeptical. Claria's new services will still require a software download "just like the old Claria software," said Ben Edelman, a Harvard University student who specializes in spyware research. "The question is how sneaky they are going to be about it." Claria's software typically comes bundled with free products such as its own eWallet password-storage program and file-sharing software like Kazaa. Though licensing agreements disclose the ad components, many computer users don't bother reading them. And that prompts complaints that Claria isn't doing enough to obtain consent. In the new model, Claria will work with developers of toolbars and instant-messaging programs as well as reputable Web sites - and largely have them bear responsibility for branding and getting consumer consent. The Interactive Advertising Bureau says pop-ups peaked at 6 percent of all online advertising two years ago and have been declining since. America Online Inc. stopped selling pop-up ads in 2002, and most Web browsers now block them. Even so, Claria claims it commanded 20 percent of the adware market with $100 million in revenues last year, mostly from pop-ups delivered through software on some 40 million computer desktops. The 7-year-old company, which has 235-odd employees at its Redwood City, Calif., headquarters and other locations, began a pilot in May of a new ad network called BehaviorLink that serves banner ads targeted to a user's interests. With software for it installed, someone reading online news articles on maternity might get pitches for baby products. And while Claria's pop-up ads sometimes covered up someone else's Web site, BehaviorLink ads come with the site's permission. In some cases, Claria buys ad space and resells it at a premium; in others, Claria works out a revenue-sharing arrangement. Companies like Revenue Science Inc. and Tacoda Systems Inc. also offer behavioral-targeting services but they use browser "cookies" instead of software downloads, meaning they could potentially reach more users overall but won't have Claria's across-the-Web targeting capabilities. The product Claria is launching this month, in a test version, is called PersonalWeb. It generates "personalized Web portals" on the fly so that a user who just checked baseball scores and movie show times might get a page pulling top items from ESPN and Moviefone. The page will also display targeted ads from BehaviorLink. An existing portal can also buy Claria's technology to incorporate personalization. Though Yahoo Inc. and others now have customization features, they rely on users to set preferences and are not automatic. BehaviorLink and PersonalWeb combined, Eagle said, will mean more time spent on each site and more value for each ad. Traditional advertising has up to 30 times the potential of adware pop-ups, he said, making Claria a possible target for acquisition. He insisted, though, that Claria was happy to remain independent, and he refused to comment on reports that Microsoft Corp. has been in talks to buy Claria. Claria still must navigate some challenging terrain on privacy and consent, and many key decisions still need to be worked out. For example, although Claria said it would obtain permission before activating PersonalWeb, it is negotiating on a site-by-site basis whether that permission would be limited to a specific site that runs PersonalWeb or cover the entire network. Claria says its data on browsing habits are all anonymous, but it is open to letting partners link such information with personally identifiable information. Whatever happens, users will be fully informed before they accept, said Reed Freeman, Claria's chief privacy officer. Benefits to the consumer, he said, will be easier to explain than the previous trade-off between free software and more pop-ups. Larry Ponemon, one of three outside privacy consultants hired by Claria, said complaints about privacy stem more from annoyance with pop-ups rather than any data collected. Non-adware companies might capture more data but get fewer complaints, he said. Claria still must win over the Web sites that once sued it. Eagle said most have been willing to listen, even if they have yet to sign deals. Advertisers that have shunned pop-ups, meanwhile, have been more willing to run traditional ads through Claria, Eagle said, though he declined to name any of the 250 advertisers participating in BehaviorLink's pilot. Elias Plishner, head of the interactive group at Universal McCann ad agency, said many companies that previously weren't willing to "dip their toes into behavior marketing" might now be willing to give Claria a chance. Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. Associated Press and other headlines also available at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:06:17 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> Subject: Web Audio Book Leader Faces Competition By JEFFREY GOLD AP Business Writer NEWARK, N.J. (AP) -- Mary Lou Kalbow started listening to books while driving a five-hour rural postal route in Minnesota about five years ago. Now she downloads titles by Janet Evanovich, Jonathan Kellerman and James Patterson to her portable MP3 player and listens all day while she works as a massage therapist. "I like to be entertained. Mystery, action, a love story. Something that keeps me on the edge of my seat," said Kalbow, 52. Kalbow is one of the thousands of devotees of Audible Inc., a pioneer in the listenable literature business that remains the Internet's top provider of audio books. The company is about to need plenty more people like her. Just as Audible is finally beginning to show profits, the prospect of stiff competition looms from Amazon.com Inc., a partner that now plans to launch its own audio book store. Another loss came with the departure of National Public Radio, whose programs are no longer available to download from Audible's Web site. Many investors revolted when Audible plowed several million dollars in revenue back into developing such services as partnerships with XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. for taking audio books on the road, including on next-generation cell phones. - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=50811481 ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:16:21 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> Subject: Parking Meters Get Smarter Wireless Technology Turns Old-Fashioned Coin-Operated Device Into a Sophisticated Tool for Catching Scofflaws and Raising Cash By CHRISTOPHER CONKEY Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL Technology is taking much of the fun out of finding a place to park the car. In Pacific Grove, Calif., parking meters know when a car pulls out of the spot and quickly reset to zero -- eliminating drivers' little joy of parking for free on someone else's quarters. In Montreal, when cars stay past their time limit, meters send real-time alerts to an enforcement officer's hand-held device, reducing the number of people needed to monitor parking spaces -- not to mention drivers' chances of getting away with violations. Meanwhile, in Aspen, Colo., wireless "in-car" meters may eliminate the need for curbside parking meters altogether: They dangle from the rear-view mirror inside the car, ticking off prepaid time. These and other innovations are reshaping the parking meter, a device that dates to 1933, when an Oklahoma inventor named Carl Magee, working with some colleagues, came up with the coin-operated, single-space mechanical meter as a means of freeing up parking spaces in downtown Oklahoma City. Two Arkansas companies have dominated the industry: POM Inc., of Russellville, which traces its lineage to Mr. Magee and his band of inventors; and Duncan Parking Technologies Inc., of Harrison. http://online.wsj.com/public/article/0,,SB112008647932273412-wcgfanaRACAlCq6aTdEWvysXWoY_20060701,00.html http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/MK-AE705B_METERS06292005200218.jpg ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:51:12 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> Subject: Where the Dangers Are / The Threats to Information Security Where the Dangers Are The threats to information security that keep the experts up at night -- and what businesses and consumers can do to protect themselves By DAVID BANK and RIVA RICHMOND Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL July 18, 2005; Page R1 In the world of cybercrime, the bad guys are getting smarter -- and more ambitious. In recent months, hackers have carried out a flurry of increasingly sophisticated attacks, highlighting the vulnerability of key computer networks around the world. Criminals penetrated the database of CardSystems Solutions Inc., nabbing up to 200,000 Visa, MasterCard, American Express and Discover card numbers and potentially exposing tens of millions more. Leading high-tech companies in Israel allegedly planted surveillance software on the computers of their business rivals. British security officials warned of a computer attack aimed at stealing sensitive information from banks, insurers and other parts of that country's "critical infrastructure." Security experts fear things will only get worse. As technology gets more complex, more vulnerabilities are springing up in computer networks -- and more criminals, terrorists and mischief makers are rushing to exploit them. http://online.wsj.com/public/article/0,,SB112128442038984802-lh_hMWcw_kpdRcSHfQ8KRQuAoZA_20060719,00.html ------------------------------ From: David <FlyLikeAnEagle@United.Com> Reply-To: FlyLikeAnEagle@United.Com Subject: Re: E-911 Making Headway in VOIP Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 01:26:23 GMT On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 07:03:41 UTC, Tim@Backhome.org wrote: > Wayne Rash wrote: >> Things change when you're not connected to the phone company's >> lines. Cell phone users, for example, are connected to their wireless >> provider. Until recently, the best the wireless company could do was >> to have a general idea of the area of the caller, accurate perhaps to >> several square miles. Now, with more accurate location being mandated, >> phones can be located using other means, including GPS (Global >> Positioning System) receivers embedded in many phones. > GPS works only outdoors in a relatively open area. It never works > indoors except perhaps when right next to a very large window with > plain glass. > This is the problem with technology that is not well understood by > those who propose using it for solutions under less than robust > circumstances. The basic problem with the VOIP Technology, as it relates to 911 and related emergency services, is that the location of the caller needs to be known to help deliver the call to the desired destination. In the USA, calls to 9-1-1 (general emergency, police, fire, and ambulance) and related local service numbers (information, local services) would need to have the callers location available. Ideally, this would be in a form that the destination system could use. Local service numbers might need a community address. The USA definition of E9-1-1 would prefer a more specific address or possibly a less definite GPS origin. There are many possible solutions to this problem. Unfortunately there is no widely established standard for a VOIP Device or internet connected computer system to specify its location. Since no standard exists, many competing standards are likely to emerge that will solve some portion of the problem but not for everyone. It will take a few years for a unified response to the problem of locating internet based callers. I have seen solutions that enable VOIP Devices to be identified within known network bounds -- say a building or company address. Certainly VOIP Devices used as a replacement for standard wireline phones will be easy to locate. However, as such phones move into the wild, as a Vonage-like phone is intended to be used, the location quickly becomes unknown. As a few unfortunate callers have learned, a standard such as "calling 911" is only as good as the underlying system that supports it. Hopefully the powers-that-be will encourage the necessary components to be linked together to establish a workable system. Until then, try to understand the limits of whatever system you choose to use and what the proper methods of contacting local services would be. David ------------------------------ From: bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) Subject: Re: Cell Phone For VOIP - Home Device Imitates Provider Signal Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:46:43 -0000 Organization: Widgets, Inc. In article <telecom24.347.11@telecom-digest.org>, jhedfors <jhedfors@gmail.com> wrote: > I wonder if such a device is feasible? > Could there be a device that gives give off a home network signal that > your cell phone can connect to as it does your service provider? You > could then user your cell handset for VOIP calls when near such a > device. > There is talk of special wi-fi enabled phones doing this, but this > could be used with any phone, and could possibly be wi-fi enabled as > well. > Any thoughts? "Feasible"?? H*LL NO!! It would be a commercial transmitter. This requires FCC 'type acceptance' or (in special cases) acceptance testing of the specific transmitter. Costs are in the high-5-to-middle-6-figures left of the decimal point. A FCC station _license_ for that device would also be required. The costs for generating the supporting data needed for the license are 'non trivial', to put it mildly. That's _before_ considering the 'design' costs of such a device. That's going to be _another_ high-5-to-middle-six-figure amount -- DESPITE the fact that you can use the basic design of a standard cell station. You have to have 'something' to replace the functionality for determining which cell answers a call, 'validating' the phone, managing inter-cell hand-off, etc. Even if you're not using the particular facilities for call management, you have to provide the basic 'control' functions to the cell station for *it* to operate properly. There's a *lot* of software to design/build/test, for 'emulating' the un-needed/un-used head-end functions required by a standard cell base-station. Next, you've got the tooling and start-up costs for the production line to build the d*mn things. Direct manufacturing cost is going to be in the low hundreds of dollars, *minimum*. Plus 'overhead' costs -- things like advertising, etc. Plus something towards recouping the 'development' costs mentioned above. Plus distributer/wholesaler mark-ups. If you peg the total development/start-up cost at 'a few million dollars', you have to sell a few thousand of these devices a year, _at_a_PROFIT_ of over $100/unit, just to cover 'debt service' on the development costs. Totalling: several hundred manufacturing cost, minimum $100 for debt service, plus 'something' towards retiring that debt, plus 'overhead' -- mgmt, marketing, etc., plus distribution costs -- I don't see _how_ such a device could carry a 'street' price much below $1,000 (probably _considerably_ higher). Considering that the buyer also has all the expenses of getting that FCC station license, I really question whether the sales of 'several thousand units/year' that the debt-service figure was predicated on is reachable. If the market is only 10 units/year, then you've got to get circa $10-25,000 per unit _just_ for the 'debt service'. After all that, there is the 'minor' issue of how that base station 'knows' what the particular phone's "home network" _is_. and how to send the right 'magic incantations' associated therewith. *AND* the matter of either 'co-ordinating' with the "real" cell-tower network so that call-handling is 'handed off' to this device, *or* of providing an over-riding signal such that the phone 'cannot see/hear' the real network when in range of this device. In the latter scenario, you have a *major* problem in ensuring that the "effect" of your base-station doesn't extend to anybody else's phones -- going by outside. (Not to mention the 'minor matter' of it being illegal to intentionally interfere with the transmissions of another licensed station. <wry grin>) *AND* the "problem" that arises when two people -- in adjacent apartments, say -- *both* try to install such a device. and one person finds that in half his apartment, he's "closer" to the other person's base station than he is to his _own_ station. Oh, yeah, their phones are both on the same 'real' carrier, so you can't even differentiate by 'home' network. To make this idea "workable" -- in a theoretical sense -- you'd need to re-design the cell *phone* itself. with a separate "mode" of operation, where it locked up to this 'private' base-station, and made no attempt to query the "common-management" and/or use an alternate cell with a "better" signal. If there is *one* thing that this 'crazy idea' is not, that thing is 'feasible'! "Feasible" means 'practical, from a _financial_ point' -- and 'finances' do look to be a real 'killer' for this project. Not the only one, but a killer nonetheless. ------------------------------ Date: 31 Jul 2005 22:35:41 -0000 From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> Subject: Re: Cell Phone For VOIP - Home Device Imitates Provider Signal Organization: I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA > Could there be a device that gives give off a home network signal that > your cell phone can connect to as it does your service provider? You > could then user your cell handset for VOIP calls when near such a > device. Technically? I suppose so, although the device would have to spoof your phone's preferred carrier to get the phone to connect. But in practice, there's no way this would happen since the frequencies in question are licensed to the cell carriers, and they would not be at all amused at freelance low-power competition that would steal their calls. > There is talk of special wi-fi enabled phones doing this, but this > could be used with any phone, and could possibly be wi-fi enabled as > well. WiFi is different, since it uses the same unlicenced band as 2.4MHz cordless phones. For that matter, why screw around with WiFi? Just make it a cell/cordless phone. R's, John ------------------------------ From: Steven Lichter <shlichter@diespammers.com> Reply-To: Die@spammers.com Organization: I Kill Spammers, Inc. (c) 2005 A Rot in Hell Co. Subject: Re: Bell System and GTE Telephone Operator? Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:38:57 GMT hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: > Back in the 1960s, the Bell System employed a great many telephone > operators in different roles. Some of the jobs looked very > interesting, such as overseas or toll operator on a cord switchboard. > Others looked extremely boring, such as directory assistance or ONI > (caller's number entry). I was wondering how an operator got assigned > to the different roles and if pay scales differed for the different > roles. > To me, Directory Assistance and Intercept seem awfully boring. It's > just looking up numbers in the various phone books. > The worst would be ONI. Before ANI (automatic number identification > became common) an operator had to come on line and ask their caller > for their number. She would key it into the system which would use it > for AMA billing. Her console for that did nothing else. > The most exciting, and available only in a few places, would be an > overseas operator. The technical handling of different countries > would be a challenge as well as speaking to overseas parties. Now > it's no big deal but back then it was. > The middle of the road would be toll and assistance on a cord > switchboard. These operators would handle trouble with local calls, > coin collection from all payphone calls, and operator handled toll > calls (collect, time & charges, person-to-person, 3rd billing, etc.) > While most toll calls were directly dialed and no big deal to set up, > occassionally a call would have to be specially built-up the old > fashioned way. > As the 1960s went into the 1970s operator jobs were reduced. Bell > charged for directory assistance and operator handled toll calls, > reducing the volume. Computerized switchboards such as TSP/TSPS > streamlined the function and "took the fun out of it". > Our retired small town telephone operator started as a teenager during > WW II. She enjoyed working the town's local manual switchboard and it > was just like in the movies -- calls handled by name and keeping track of > where the doctor and policeman were in town. When the town went dial > in 1954, she was transferred to a nearby city where it was a completely > different atmosphere -- very structured and disciplined. When I toured > some Bell central offices in the 1970s the operator's areas didn't seem > quite as 'tight' as the 1950s is described. > The last manual boards in my area -- in suburban towns -- were retired > around 1962. One area was fairly built up and would've had a lot of > traffic, enough to justify the "A" and "B" boards (calls received by > an "A" board, then passed to the appropriate "B" board for final > connection). I wonder if those locations were disciplined. I worked in the COs with GTE and many of the large ones had operators, and yes they were ran like the Bells were as many of the managers were former Bell people that left for one reason or another, that went for the stockings and such, no pants until the late 70s. As you said when TSPS systems came online things changed. I worked a lot of the TSPS conversons, the directors had to be modified and tested then we had to move 800 and payphone detection systems and convert them for TSPS. As the changes were made fewer and fewer offices Toll offices and a few remotes. I remeber one cut, it was and the Redondo Beach, Co, which was in Hermosa Beach; right at the boarder. As we cut offices into the TSPS offices, there were less operators on shift and less for them to do, the last office to cut in that area was Redondo and when we cut it all the boards went dark. I remember some of the operators coing into the CO to see what we were doing, they were either very young kids or older woman who had been operators for years, they were transfere to other offices and jobs, it was really said. The same came as we converted our offices to EAX. The good old days. Well I'm retired for the most part, I do some COEI contracting when I feel like it, it is just not the same. > I also wonder what city switchboards (not tiny towns) were like under > General Telephone and other independent companies. Did their city > switchboards have the same discipline as the Bell System have the same > strictness? [In the computer world, IBM was very formal while its > competitors were not.] > Historically, there wasn't much of a career path for a telephone > operator. Often young women took the job for a few years until they > got married or had kids, and then they quit. Some returned after the > kids were grown. A few would get promoted to be supervisors. Others > would leave and get jobs as PBX operators -- almost all large PBX > installations required an operator to be "Bell trained" and have Bell > Telephone experience to get hired. As a PBX operator, one might have > career advancement within the particular company depending on her > skills and the attitude of the company (ie going from operator to > office secretary). The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? (c) 2005 I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot in Hell Co. ------------------------------ From: johnl@iecc.com (John R. Levine) Subject: Re: Nextel False Advertising Date: 31 Jul 2005 18:28:45 -0400 Organization: I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA > I believe the NYS Attorney General recently hauled them into court for > false advertising. If he did, he managed to do so without issuing a press release nor without anyone in the media noticing, which is rather unlikely. Last year he did complain that Nextel was buying new spectrum too cheaply, but that's an entirely separate issue. He did force Verizon to add some anti-cramming protections earlier this year. Perhaps that's what you're thinking of. R's, John ------------------------------ From: wollman@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) Subject: Re: Nextel False Advertising Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:31:56 UTC Organization: MIT Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory In article <telecom24.347.18@telecom-digest.org>, PAT writes: > (2)"Although we do serve a large portion of the public and are > considered 'nationwide', we only serve mostly people centered near > major interstate highways and in larger cities successfully" Look closely at the advertising and you'll probably find that they do say that. There's probably some fine print to the tune of "nationwide coverage claims based on 89% of US population". That means that they don't claim to serve the least-economical 11% of the country, as determined by population, which is of course a huge land area. They could exclude all of Kansas, Nebraska, and the Dakotas and still meet that claim. (In actuality, they probably do serve, KCK, Wichita, Omaha, Lincoln, Sioux Falls, Fargo, and Bismarck -- just not the hundreds of miles of small towns and farms in between.) Their Web site is quite honest about this (much more so than most carriers' coverage maps that I have seen): <http://www.nextel.com/en/coverage/index.shtml> Garrett A. Wollman | As the Constitution endures, persons in every wollman@csail.mit.edu | generation can invoke its principles in their own Opinions not those | search for greater freedom. of MIT or CSAIL. | - A. Kennedy, Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) ------------------------------ TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums. It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. Contact information: Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest Post Office Box 50 Independence, KS 67301 Phone: 620-402-0134 Fax 1: 775-255-9970 Fax 2: 530-309-7234 Fax 3: 208-692-5145 Email: editor@telecom-digest.org Subscribe: telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/ (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives) RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308 and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest ************************************************************************* * TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from * * Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate * * 800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting. * * http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com * * Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing * * views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc. * ************************************************************************* ICB Toll Free News. Contact information is not sold, rented or leased. One click a day feeds a person a meal. Go to http://www.thehungersite.com Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. ************************ DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO YOUR CREDIT CARD! REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST AND EASY411.COM SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest ! ************************ Visit http://www.mstm.okstate.edu and take the next step in your career with a Master of Science in Telecommunications Management (MSTM) degree from Oklahoma State University (OSU). This 35 credit-hour interdisciplinary program is designed to give you the skills necessary to manage telecommunications networks, including data, video, and voice networks. The MSTM degree draws on the expertise of the OSU's College of Business Administration; the College of Arts and Sciences; and the College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology. The program has state-of-the-art lab facilities on the Stillwater and Tulsa campus offering hands-on learning to enhance the program curriculum. Classes are available in Stillwater, Tulsa, or through distance learning. Please contact Jay Boyington for additional information at 405-744-9000, mstm-osu@okstate.edu, or visit the MSTM web site at http://www.mstm.okstate.edu ************************ --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization. End of TELECOM Digest V24 #348 ****************************** | |